Talk:Aquanator: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Picture == |
== Picture == |
||
The picture |
The picture was an obscene and idiotic spoof! [[User:163.244.62.121|163.244.62.121]] 19:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:49, 30 October 2007
Advert?
Is this just an advert? Fig 12:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fair question but I don't think so. It is factual and sourced. TerriersFan 15:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Aquanator and its ilk
I agree with the above comment. At a meeting in the Centre for Alternative Energy recently I listened to the discussion of a similar device to tap into the energies of the ocean currents flowing between Certain Scottish islands. Of far greater mass than wind these currents can provide an immense torque in turbines driven by them, potentially allowing a vast energy harvest. The only snag I could see was what if the current moved after you built your plant as in changes to the North Atlantic drift etc due to ice melt up north. One to watch and encourage I feel.Ethicalafforestation 18:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Picture
The picture was an obscene and idiotic spoof! 163.244.62.121 19:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)