Jump to content

Talk:Rapport: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Definition: new section
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 82.77.41.7 - "Definition: new section"
Line 10: Line 10:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==


it would be great to find a definition of the term, others we do not know what we are talking about
it would be great to find a definition of the term, others we do not know what we are talking about <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.77.41.7|82.77.41.7]] ([[User talk:82.77.41.7|talk]]) 17:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 17:54, 3 November 2007

  • oppose merge -- different topics (for me). Rapport has both a general meaning, and also a series of views, and associations in NLP. Its important that people looking up rapport in general, are not pointed to a substantially-NLP article, since this would misrepresent rapport. On the other hand, people who want to read NLP's methods related to rapport should not be limited to a minority view of a larger article. FT2 (Talk) 14:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose merge Yeah, me too. They do have their differences, though of course they should have references to each other. Mathmo Talk 22:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jung's Contributions

Jung had several things to say about rapport, especially in a clinical setting.

Also, there is some preliminary evidence that Socionics' 7th function may be the origin of rapport. This function is believed to "limit" or exclude information it does not agree with. People who possess the same ranges of limited information would naturally see the world similarly, because they see themselves in similar situations.

Definition

it would be great to find a definition of the term, others we do not know what we are talking about —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.77.41.7 (talk) 17:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]