Jump to content

Binary prefix: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Yet another attempt to make this ambiguity clear :-(
Revert to last good version.
Line 1: Line 1:
In computing, '''binary prefixes''' can be used to quantify large numbers where powers of two are more useful than powers of ten (such as [[computer memory]] sizes). Each successive prefix is multiplied by 1024 (2<sup>10</sup>) rather than the 1000 (10<sup>3</sup>) used by the [[SI prefix]] system. Binary prefixes often use the same term, abbreviation and pronunciation as SI prefixes, despite the resulting ambiguity.
In computing, '''binary prefixes''' can be used to quantify large numbers where powers of two are more useful than powers of ten (such as [[computer memory]] sizes). Each successive prefix is multiplied by 1024 (2<sup>10</sup>) rather than the 1000 (10<sup>3</sup>) used by the [[SI prefix]] system. Binary prefixes are often written and pronounced identically to the SI prefixes, despite the resulting ambiguity.


== History ==
== History ==

Revision as of 19:58, 3 November 2007

In computing, binary prefixes can be used to quantify large numbers where powers of two are more useful than powers of ten (such as computer memory sizes). Each successive prefix is multiplied by 1024 (210) rather than the 1000 (103) used by the SI prefix system. Binary prefixes are often written and pronounced identically to the SI prefixes, despite the resulting ambiguity.

History

Early computers used one of two addressing methods to access the system memory; binary (base-2) or decimal (base-10). For instance, the IBM 701 (1952) used binary and could address 2,048 36-bit words, while the IBM 702 (1953) used decimal and could address 10,000 7-bit words.

One of the most successful early computers was the IBM 1401. It was introduced in 1959 and by 1961 one out of every four electronic stored-program computers was an IBM 1401. It used decimal addressing and could have 1400, 2000, 4000, 8000, 12000 or 16000 characters of 8-bit core storage.[1] These sizes were often abbreviated, borrowing the k from the SI system of prefixes; a reference to a "4k IBM 1401" meant 4,000 characters of storage (memory).[2]

By the mid 1960s, binary addressing had become the standard architecture in computer design. The computer system documentation would specify the memory size with an exact number such as 32,768, 65,536 or 131,072 words of storage (all powers of 2). There were several methods used to abbreviate these quantities. The use of K in the binary sense as in a "32K store" can be found as early as 1960.[3] Gene Amdahl's seminal 1964 article on IBM System/360 used 1K to mean 1024.[4] This style was used by other computer vendors, the CDC 7600 System Description (1968) made extensive use of K as 1024.[5] Another style was to truncate the last 3 digits and append K. The exact values 32,768, 65,536 and 131,072 would then become 32K, 65K and 131K.[6] (If 32,768 were instead rounded off, it would be 33K; if K = 1024 were used, 65,536 would become "64K".) This style was used from about 1965 to 1975.

These two styles (K = 1024 and truncation) were used loosely around the same time, sometimes by the same company. (In discussions of binary-addressed memories, the exact size was evident from context.) The HP 21MX real-time computer (1974) denoted 196,608 as 196K and 1,048,576 as 1 M,[7] while the HP 3000 business computer (1973) could have 64K, 96K, or 128K bytes of memory.[8]

The terms Kbit, Kbyte, Mbit and Mbyte started to be used as binary units in the early 1970s.[9] Most memory capacities were expressed in K, even when M could have been used: The IBM System/370 Model 158 brochure (1972) had the following: "Real storage capacity is available in 512K increments ranging from 512K to 2,048K bytes."[10] Megabyte was used to describe the 22-bit addressing of DEC PDP-11/70 (1975)[11] and gigabyte the 30-bit addressing DEC VAX11/780 (1977).

By the mid 1970s it was common to see K (or Kbyte) as 1,024 and the occasional M (or Mbyte) as 1,048,576 for words or bytes of memory (RAM). K and M were also used with their decimal meaning for disk storage. In the 1980s the terms kilobyte, megabyte, and gigabyte became popular along with the abbreviations KB, MB, and GB.

The dual use of these prefixes as both decimal and binary quantities was defined in early standards and dictionaries. The ANSI/IEEE Std 1084-1986[12] is still available for reference and defined kilo and mega. (The term "computer storage" means system memory.)[4]

kilo (K). (1) A prefix indicating 1000. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 210, or 1024.

mega (M). (1) A prefix indicating one million. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 220, or 1,048,576.

The binary units Kbyte and Mbyte were formally defined in ANSI/IEEE Std 1212-1991.[13] The terms Kbyte, Mbyte, and Gbyte are found in the trade press and in IEEE journals. "Gigabyte" was formally defined in IEEE Std 610.10-1994 as either 1,000,000,000 or 230 bytes.[14] Kilobyte, Kbyte, and KB are equivalent units and all are defined in the current standard, IEEE 100-2000.[15]

The industry has coped with the dual definitions because system memory (RAM) typically uses the binary meaning while disk storage uses the decimal meaning. There are exceptions like diskettes and CDs. There are no SI units for computer storage capacity but the decimal prefix meanings of KB, MB, and GB are often referred to as SI prefixes.

In January 1999, the International Electrotechnical Commission introduced the prefixes kibi-(Kibibyte), mebi-, gibi-, etc., and the symbols Ki, Mi, Gi, etc. to specify binary multiples of a quantity and eliminate this ambiguity.[16] The names for the new standard are derived from the first two letters of the original SI prefixes followed by bi, short for "binary". The new standard also clarifies that, from the point of view of the IEC, the SI prefixes will henceforth only have their base-10 meaning and never have a base-2 meaning.

The second edition of the standard[17] defined them only up to exbi-[18], but in 2005, the third edition added prefixes zebi- and yobi-, thus matching all standard SI prefixes with their binary counterparts.[19]

On March 19, 2005 the IEEE standard IEEE 1541-2002 (Prefixes for Binary Multiples) was elevated to a full-use standard by the IEEE Standards Association after a two-year trial period.[20]

Consumer confusion

In the early days of computers there was little or no consumer confusion because of the sophisticated nature of the consumers and the practice of the computer manufacturers to specify (as opposed to advertise) their products with decimal digits of sufficient places, e.g., the 1968 IBM stated System 360 "Model 91s can accommodate up to 6,291,496 bytes of main storage."[21]

Hard disk drive manufacturers used MB, i.e. 106 bytes, to characterize their products as early as 1974.[22] By 1977, in its first edition, Disk/Trend, a leading hard disk drive industry marketing consultancy segmented the industry according to MB's (decimal sense) of capacity.[23]

The presentation of hard disk drive capacity by an operating system using MB in a binary sense appears no earlier than Macintosh Finder after 1984. Prior to that, on the systems that had a hard disk drive, capacity was presented in decimal digits with no prefix of any sort (e.g., MS/PC DOS CHKDSK command).

See, for example, the following two images; consumers may be confused by the difference between the 160 GB on the disk drive package and the 149.05 GB reported by the operating system.

Binary prefixes using SI symbols

Name Symbol Value Base 16 Base 10
kilo k/K 210 = 1,024 = 162.5 > 103
mega M 220 = 1,048,576 = 165 > 106
giga G 230 = 1,073,741,824 = 167.5 > 109
tera T 240 = 1,099,511,627,776 = 1610 > 1012
peta P 250 = 1,125,899,906,842,624 = 1612.5 > 1015
exa E 260 = 1,152,921,504,606,846,976 = 1615 > 1018
zetta Z 270 = 1,180,591,620,717,411,303,424 = 1617.5 > 1021
yotta Y 280 = 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176  = 1620 > 1024

The one-letter symbols are identical to SI prefixes, except for "K", which is used interchangeably with "k" (in SI, the upper-case or capital "K" stands for kelvin, and only the lower-case "k" represents 1,000).

These prefixes are in common use in contexts such as file and memory sizes. The names and values of the SI prefixes were defined in the 1960 SI standard, with powers-of-1000 values. Standard dictionaries do recognize the binary meanings for these prefixes.[24][25] Oxford online dictionary define, for example, megabyte as: "Computing a unit of information equal to one million or (strictly) 1,048,576 bytes."[26]

BIPM (the International Bureau of Weights and Measures which maintains SI) expressly prohibits the binary prefix usage, and recommends the use of the IEC prefixes as an alternative since computing units are not included in SI.[27]

Some have suggested that "k" be used for 1,000, and "K" for 1,024, but this cannot be extended to the higher order prefixes and has never been widely recognised.

Although the SI prefixes denoting fractions of a bit or byte might theoretically find application in areas such as cryptography, data compression, and data transfer rates, they are not used in practice.

Informally, the prefixes are often used on their own. Thus one might hear about a "256K DRAM" (256 binary kilobytes), "a 160 MB HDD" (160 decimal megabytes) or "a 2M Internet connection" (2 decimal megabits per second). What units are being used, and whether the multipliers are decimal or binary, depends on context and cannot be determined by the units alone.

IEC standard prefixes

Name Symbol Base 2 Base 16 Base 10
kibi Ki 210 162.5 400(16) 1,024 > 103
mebi Mi 220 165 10 0000(16) 1,048,576 > 106
gibi Gi 230 167.5 4 000 0000(16) 1,073,741,824 > 109
tebi Ti 240 1610 100 0000 0000(16) 1,099,511,627,776 > 1012
pebi Pi 250 1612.5 4 0000 0000 0000(16) 1,125,899,906,842,624 > 1015
exbi Ei 260 1615 1000 0000 0000 0000(16) 1,152,921,504,606,846,976 > 1018
zebi Zi 270 1617.5 40 0000 0000 0000 0000(16) 1,180,591,620,717,411,303,424 > 1021
yobi Yi 280 1620 1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000(16) 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 > 1024

Example: 300 GB ≅ 279.5 GiB.

Approximate ratios between binary & decimal prefixes

As the order of magnitude increases, the percentage difference between the binary and decimal values of a prefix increases, from 2.4% (with the kilo prefix) to over 20% (with the yotta prefix). This makes differentiating between the two increasingly important as larger and larger data storage and transmission technologies are developed.

Name Bin ÷ Dec Dec ÷ Bin Example Percentage difference
kilobyte : kibibyte 1.024 0.976 100 kB ≅ 97.6 KiB +2.4% or −2.3%
megabyte : mebibyte 1.049 0.954 100 MB ≅ 95.4 MiB +4.9% or −4.6%
gigabyte : gibibyte 1.074 0.931 100 GB ≅ 93.1 GiB +7.4% or −6.9%
terabyte : tebibyte 1.100 0.909 100 TB ≅ 90.9 TiB +10% or −9.1%
petabyte : pebibyte 1.126 0.888 100 PB ≅ 88.8 PiB +12.6% or −11.2%
exabyte : exbibyte 1.153 0.867 100 EB ≅ 86.7 EiB +15.3% or −13.3%
zettabyte : zebibyte 1.181 0.847 100 ZB ≅ 84.7 ZiB +18.1% or −15.3%
yottabyte : yobibyte 1.209 0.827 100 YB ≅ 82.7 YiB +20.9% or −17.3%

Adoption

As of 2007, the IEC binary naming convention is not widespread. Most publications, computer manufacturers and software companies are still using the traditional binary units defined in IEEE 100, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, Seventh Edition, 2000. [15]

It is strongly supported by many standardization bodies and technical organizations, such as IEEE, CIPM, NIST, and SAE.[28][27][29][30] The new binary prefixes have also been adopted by the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) as the harmonization document HD 60027-2:2003-03.[31] This document will be adopted as a European standard.[32]

The prefixes are beginning to be used in technical articles and software where it is important to avoid ambiguity. The PC Guide, for example. Examples of software that use IEC standard prefixes (along with standard SI prefixes) include the Linux kernel,[33] GNU Core Utilities,[34] Launchpad, GParted,[35] ifconfig,[36] Deluge (BitTorrent client), [37], Azureus, Pidgin (IM client)[38] and BitTornado. Other programs like fdisk and apt-get use SI prefixes with their decimal meaning.

It can be argued that the main purpose of the binary prefixes is to clarify that, according to national and international standards, the traditional SI prefixes always refer to powers of ten, even in the context of information technology. Therefore, rather than measuring the success of the binary prefixes based on how commonly they appear in technical and marketing literature, it may be more appropriate to judge them by their success in restoring the original power-of-ten meaning of the standard SI prefixes in information technology. Binary prefixes are only convenient for a small number of information-technology quantities, most notably the size of address spaces (e.g., of RAM chips). They provide no practical advantage for quantities where powers-of-two times a small integer are not preferred numbers, such as file sizes, download speeds, line rates, symbol rates, clock frequencies, tape or disk capacities. There, decimal prefixes are far more convenient for mental arithmetic.

Usage notes

In this section, the phrase "decimal unit" will be used to denote "SI designation understood in its standard, decimal, power-of-1000 sense" and "binary unit" will mean "SI designation understood in its binary, power-of-1024 sense." B will be used as the symbol for byte as per computer-industry standard (IEEE 1541 and IEC 60027; B is also the symbol for bel, a common non-SI unit used to quantify power ratios on a logarithmic scale).

Certain units are always understood as decimal even in computing contexts. For example, hertz (Hz), which is used to measure clock rates of electronic components, and bit/s, used to measure bit rate. So a 1 GHz processor performs 1,000,000,000 clock ticks per second, a 128 kbit/s MP3 stream consumes 128,000 bits (16 kB, 15.625 KiB) per second, and a 1 Mbit/s Internet connection can transfer 1,000,000 bits (125 kB, approx 122 KiB) per second, assuming an 8-bit byte, and no overhead.[39]

Pronunciation

It is suggested that in English, the first syllable of the name of the binary-multiple prefix should be pronounced in the same way as the first syllable of the name of the corresponding SI prefix, and that the second syllable should be pronounced as "bee." [29]

Computer memory

Main article: JEDEC memory standards
The 536,870,912 byte (512×220) capacity of these RAM modules is stated as "512 MB" on the label.

Measurements of most types of electronic memory such as RAM and ROM and Flash (large scale disk-like flash is sometimes an exception) are given in binary units, as they are made in power-of-two sizes. This is the most natural configuration for memory, as all combinations of their address lines map to a valid address, allowing easy aggregation into a larger contiguous block of memory.

JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, the semiconductor engineering standardization body of the Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) in Standard 100B.01[6][40] defines in the binary sense K, M and G as prefixes to units of semiconductor memory, noting that these definitions are “only included to reflect common usage” and noting that ‘IEEE/ASTM SI 10-1997 state “This practice frequently leads to confusion and is deprecated.” ’. All standards published by JEDEC are still using the common usage, including end-user packaging recommendations for memory chips.

Many computer programming tasks naturally reference memory in terms of powers of two. For example, a 16-bit pointer can reference at most 65,536 items (bytes, words, or other objects), or an operating system might map memory in terms of 4,096-byte pages, in which case exactly 8,192 pages could be allocated within 33,554,432 bytes of hardware memory. It is convenient to informally express these numbers, respectively, as 64K items, or as 8K pages of 4 Kbytes (KiB) each within 32 MBytes (MiB) of memory. A programmer can easily mentally calculate that "8K × 4K is 32 meg" and get it exactly right, within this powers-of-two context. This convenience is likely one source of originally adapting "kilo" and "mega" from SI as shorthand for 1,024 and 1,048,576, as specialized jargon within a segment of the industry.

Almost all computer user tasks (and many high-level programming tasks) have no natural affinity or need for explicit powers of two. The consumer confusion between powers of 1000 and powers of 1024 may derive largely from some operating systems and applications that were originally written by and for programmers, and which thus reported quantities such as file sizes in familiar (to programmers) powers of 1024 while using SI (powers of 1000) abbreviations. Without such reporting, most users might not have been substantially exposed to powers of 1024, as the net memory available to users after various overheads is rarely a power of two. This legacy behavior of operating systems reporting sizes in powers of 1024 has continued to this day (in 2007) even in many GUI oriented operating systems intended mainly for non-programmers.

Hard disk drives

HDD manufacturers state capacity in decimal units. This usage has a long tradition, even predating the SI system of decimal prefixes adopted in 1960, as follows:

  • The first disk drive the IBM 350 (1950s) had 5,000,000 6 bit characters organized in 100 character sectors (i.e., blocks). This predates the SI system.
  • In the 1960s virtually all disk drives used IBM's variable block length format (called, Count Key Data or "CKD[41]"). Any block size could be specified up to the maximum track length. Blocks ("records" in IBM's terminology) of 88, 96, 880 and 960 were often used because they related to the fixed block size of punch cards. The drive capacity was usually stated in full track record blocking, for example, the 100 Megabyte 3336 disk pack only achieved that capacity with a full track block size of 13,030 bytes.
  • CKD continued into the 1990s and perhaps into this day. In the 1970s and 1980s most drives were specified with unformatted tracks (the unformatted capacity) with the particular block size and formatted capacity a function of the controller design. For example, the ST412 of IBM PC/XT fame had an unformatted capacity of 12.75 MB (not MiB) and with the Xebec controller and 512 byte blocks it formatted to and was advertised as a 10.0 MB (not MiB) HDD. Other controllers supported other block sizes resulting in other formatted capacities.
  • The advent of intelligent interfaces (SCSI and IDE) in the early 1990s took the block size decision into the drive and virtually all chose 512 bytes, for no reason other than that was what IBM had chosen when they picked the Xebec controller for the PC/XT. Capacity continued to be specified by the HDD manufacturers with SI prefix definitions.

Regardless of the HDD manufacturers' continuous practice of specifying with conventional SI prefixes, some systems' GUIs took the HDD capacity, reported by the operating system as a binary number without prefixes, and reported the HDD capacity in a mixed decimal number/binary prefix[citation needed] leading to some confusion. As of January 2007, most, if not all, HDD manufacturers continue to use decimal prefixes to identify capacity.[42]

Flash drives

USB Flash Drive and Flash-based memory cards like CompactFlash and Secure Digital are typically classified in "powers of two" multiples of decimal megabytes; for example, a "256 MB" card would hold 256 million bytes.[43] Although the devices usually have at least the expected byte capacity, each manufacturer allocates different portions of the device's ultimate capacity for such things as wear levelling.

Floppy drives

Floppy disk drive and media manufacturers use decimal units for unformatted recording capacity while most computer operating systems use binary units to measure the formatted capacity. The original IBM Personal Computer (1981) used a Tandon TM100 5¼ inch floppy disk drive. The single sided drive was rated at 250 kilobytes (unformatted) and the double sided version was rated at 500 kilobytes. [44]

A 5¼ inch diskette recorded at double density (MFM) will hold 6,250 bytes per track and has 40 tracks per side, yielding 250,000 bytes per side. To make it practical to record smaller blocks of data, the tracks are formatted into sectors with gaps between them. The gaps allow individual sectors to be recorded without overwriting adjacent sectors. Each sector also has additional header bytes to identify the sector.

With IBM PC-DOS 1.0 and 1.1, each track has 8 sectors of 512 bytes and this provides 163,840 bytes per side (8 × 512 × 40). The IBM user documentation referred to this as "160KB" for single sided diskette and "320KB" for double sided diskette.[45] Starting with PC-DOS 2.0 (1983), each track had 9 sectors of 512 bytes. The formatted capacity was increased to 184,320 bytes per side or 368,640 bytes per diskette. The IBM documentation referred to these as "180KB" and "360KB" diskettes. The same drives and media can have different capacities depending on format.[46]

On all diskettes the capacity available to the user will be smaller that the total number of sectors because some are reserved by the operating system for boot records or directory tables.

The IBM Personal Computer/AT (1984) had a new 5¼ inch disk drive that had 80 tracks per side, rotated at 360 rpm (versus 300 rpm) and had a new diskette media. The formatted capacity was 1,228,800 bytes or 1200 KiB. (80 tracks × 15 sectors × 512 bytes × 2 sides)

The IBM PC Convertible (1986) used the 3½ inch diskettes. These were similar in recording technology to the original 5¼ inch drives except they had 80 tracks per side. The formatted capacity was 737,280 bytes or 720 KiB. Apple used the same disk with a different recording technology, GRC, that gave a formatted capacity of 819,200 bytes or 800 KiB. Apple referred to this as an "800K" disk.[47]

The last widely adopted diskette was the 3½ inch high density. This has twice the capacity as the 720 KB diskettes, 1,474,560 bytes or 1440 KB. The drive was marketed as 1.44 MB when a more accurate value would have been 1.4 MB (1.40625 MB). Some users have noticed the missing 0.04 MB and both Apple and Microsoft have support bulletins referring to them as 1.4 MB.[48] [47] The 1200 KB 5½ inch diskette was marketed as 1.2 MB (1.171875 MiB) without any controversy.

CD and DVD

CD capacities are always given in binary units. A "700 MB" (or "80 minute") CD has a nominal capacity of about 700 MiB (approx 730MB).[49] But DVD capacities are given in decimal units. A "4.7 GB" DVD has a nominal capacity of about 4.38 GiB.[50]

Buses

Bus bandwidth is given in decimal units. This is not because hard drive capacities use the decimal versions, nor because bit rates do, but because clock speeds do. For example, "PC3200" memory runs on a double pumped 200 MHz bus, transferring 8 bytes per cycle, and hence has a bandwidth of 200,000,000×2×8 = 3,200,000,000 byte/s.

There have been two significant class action lawsuits against digital storage manufactures. One case involved flash memory and the other involved hard disk drives. Both were settled with the manufactures agreeing to clarify the storage capacity of their products on the consumer packaging.

On February 20, 2004, Willem Vroegh filed a lawsuit against Lexar Media, Dane–Elec Memory, Fuji Photo Film USA, Eastman Kodak Company, Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Memorex Products, Inc.; PNY Technologies Inc., SanDisk Corporation, Verbatim Corporation, and Viking InterWorks alleging that their descriptions of the capacity of their flash memory cards were false and misleading.

Vroegh claimed that a 256 MB Flash Memory Device had only 244 MB of accessible memory. "Plaintiffs allege that Defendants marketed the memory capacity of their products by assuming that one megabyte equals one million bytes and one gigabyte equals one billion bytes." The plaintiffs wanted to use the binary values 220 for megabyte and 230 for gigabyte. The plaintiffs acknowledged that the IEC and IEEE standards define a MB as one million bytes but stated that the industry has largely ignored the IEC standards. [51]

The manufacturers agreed to clarify the flash memory card capacity on the packaging and web sites.[1] The consumers could apply for "a discount of ten percent off a future online purchase from Defendants' Online Stores Flash Memory Device".[52] The law firms Gutride Safier, LLP and Milberg Weiss received $2.4 million.

On July 7, 2005, an action entitled Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation, et al., was filed in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-05-442812. The case was subsequently moved to the Northern District of California, Case No. 05-03353 BZ.[53]

Although Western Digital maintained that their usage of units is consistent with "the indisputably correct industry standard for measuring and describing storage capacity", and that they "cannot be expected to reform the software industry", they agreed to settle in March 2006 with June 14, 2006 as the Final Approval hearing date.[54]

Western Digital offered to compensate customers with a free download of backup and recovery software valued at US$30. They also paid $500,000 in fees and expenses to San Francisco lawyers Adam Gutride and Seth Safier, who filed the suit.[citation needed]

Western Digital had this footnote in their settlement. "Apparently, Plaintiff believes that he could sue an egg company for fraud for labeling a carton of 12 eggs a “dozen,” because some bakers would view a “dozen” as including 13 items."[55]

The flash memory and hard disk manufacturers now have disclaimers on their packaging and web sites clarifying the formatted capacity of the flash memory[43] or defining MB as 1 million bytes and 1 GB as 1 billion bytes.[56]

Also, the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 requires greater scrutiny on coupon settlements. One of the plaintiff law firms in the Vroegh case, Milberg Weiss & Bershad, was indicted for fraud in unrelated class action cases.[57]

See also

Specific units of IEC 60027-2 A.2

These units have individual articles:

Bit rates (data-rate units)
Name Symbol Multiple
bit per second bit/s 1 1
Metric prefixes (SI)
kilobit per second kbit/s 103 10001
megabit per second Mbit/s 106 10002
gigabit per second Gbit/s 109 10003
terabit per second Tbit/s 1012 10004
Binary prefixes (IEC 80000-13)
kibibit per second Kibit/s 210 10241
mebibit per second Mibit/s 220 10242
gibibit per second Gibit/s 230 10243
tebibit per second Tibit/s 240 10244
Multiple-byte units
Decimal
Value Metric
1000 kB kilobyte
10002 MB megabyte
10003 GB gigabyte
10004 TB terabyte
10005 PB petabyte
10006 EB exabyte
10007 ZB zettabyte
10008 YB yottabyte
10009 RB ronnabyte
100010 QB quettabyte
Binary
Value IEC Memory
1024 KiB kibibyte KB kilobyte
10242 MiB mebibyte MB megabyte
10243 GiB gibibyte GB gigabyte
10244 TiB tebibyte TB terabyte
10245 PiB pebibyte —
10246 EiB exbibyte —
10247 ZiB zebibyte —
10248 YiB yobibyte —
—
—
Orders of magnitude of data
Multiple-bit units
Decimal
Value Metric
1000 kbit kilobit
10002 Mbit megabit
10003 Gbit gigabit
10004 Tbit terabit
10005 Pbit petabit
10006 Ebit exabit
10007 Zbit zettabit
10008 Ybit yottabit
10009 Rbit ronnabit
100010 Qbit quettabit
Binary
Value IEC Memory
1024 Kibit kibibit Kbit Kb kilobit
10242 Mibit mebibit Mbit Mb megabit
10243 Gibit gibibit Gbit Gb gigabit
10244 Tibit tebibit —
10245 Pibit pebibit —
10246 Eibit exbibit —
10247 Zibit zebibit —
10248 Yibit yobibit —
—
—
Orders of magnitude of data

References

  1. ^ IBM (April 1962). IBM 1401 Data Processing System: Reference Manual (PDF) (A24-1403-5 ed.). pp. pg 9. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  2. ^ Sonquiest, John A. (December 1962). "Fixed-word-length arrays in variable-word-length computers". Communications of the ACM. 5 (12). ACM Press: pg 602. The following scheme for assigning storage for fixed-word-length arrays seems to meet these criteria and has been used successfully in working with linear arrays on a 4k IBM 1401. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  3. ^ Gruenberger, Fred (October 1960). "Letters to the Editor". Communications of the ACM. 3 (10). "The 8K core stores were getting fairly common in this country in 1954. The 32K store started mass production in 1956; it is the standard now for large machines and at least 200 machines of the size (or its equivalent in the character addressable machines) are in existence today (and at least 100 were in existence in mid-1959)." Note: The IBM 1401 was a character addressable computer.
  4. ^ a b Amdahl, Gene M. (1964). "Architecture of the IBM System/360" (PDF). IBM Journal of Research and Development. 8 (2). IBM. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Figure 1 gives storage (memory) capacity ranges of the various models in "Capacity 8 bit bytes, 1 K = 1024"
  5. ^ Control Data Corporation (November 1968). Control Data 7600 Computer System: Preliminary System Description (PDF). One type, designated as the small core memory (SCM) is a many bank coincident current type memory with a total of 64K words of 60 bit length (K=1024).{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: year (link)
  6. ^ Control Data Corporation (1965–1967). Control Data 6400/6500/6600 Computer Systems Reference Manual (Pub No. 60100000 ed.). pp. pg 2-1. Central Memory is organized into 32K, 65K, or 131K words (60-bit) in 8, 16, or 32 banks of 4096 words each. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: date format (link)
  7. ^ Frankenberg, Robert (October 1974). "All Semiconductor Memory Selected for New Minicomputer Series" (PDF). Hewlett-Packard Journal. 26 (2). Hewlett-Packard: pg 15-20. Retrieved 2007-06-18. 196K-word memory size {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  8. ^ Hewlett-Packard (November 1973), "HP 3000 Configuration Guide" (PDF), HP 3000 Computer System and Subsystem Data: pg 59 {{citation}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  9. ^ Lin, Yeong (September 1972). "Cost-performance evaluation of memory hierarchies". Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on. 8 (3). IEEE: pg 390-392. Also, random access devices are advantageous over serial access devices for backing store applications only when the memory capacity is less than 1 Mbyte. For capacities of 4 Mbyte and 16 Mbyte serial access stores with shift register lengths of 256 bit and 1024 bit, respectively, look favorable. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ IBM (1972). "System/370 Model 158 brochure" (PDF). IBM. All-monolithic storage ... (1024-bit NMOS) This new improvement of processor storage makes system expansion more economical. Real storage capacity is available in 512K increments ranging from 512K to 2,048K bytes. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. ^ Bell, Gordon (November 1975). "Computer structures: What have we learned from the PDP-11?" (PDF). ISCA '76: Proceedings of the 3rd annual symposium on Computer architecture. ACM Press: pg 1-14. memory size (8k bytes to 4 megabytes). {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ ANSI/IEEE Std 1084-1986 IEEE Standard Glossary of Mathematics of Computing Terminology. October 30, 1986. kilo (K). (1) A prefix indicating 1000. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 210, or 1024. mega (M). (1) A prefix indicating one million. (2) In statements involving size of computer storage, a prefix indicating 220, or 1,048,576.
  13. ^ ANSI/IEEE Std 1212-1991 IEEE Standard Control and Status Register (CSR) Architecture for Microcomputer Buses. July 22, 1992. Kbyte. Kilobyte. Indicates 210 bytes. Mbyte. Megabyte. Indicates 220bytes. Gbyte is used in the Foreword.
  14. ^ IEEE Std 610.10-1994 IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Hardware Terminology. June 24, 1994. gigabyte (gig, GB). This term may mean either a) 1,000,000,000 bytes or b) 230 bytes. … As used in this document, the terms kilobyte (kB) means 210 or 1024 bytes, megabyte (MB) means 1024 kilobytes, and gigabyte (GB) means 1024 megabytes.
  15. ^ a b Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2000). The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms. IEEE Computer Society Press. ISBN 0-7381-2601-2. "kB See kilobyte." "Kbyte Kilobyte. Indicates 210 bytes." "Kilobyte Either 1000 or 210 or 1024 bytes." The standard also defines megabyte and gigabyte. There is a note that an alternative notation for base-2 is under development.
  16. ^ ""International System of Units (SI): Prefixes for binary multiples"". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. National Institute of Science and Technology. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  17. ^ IEC 60027-2 (2000-11) Ed. 2.0
  18. ^ A.J.Thor (2000). "Prefixes for binary multiples" (PDF). Metrologica. 37 (81).
  19. ^ "HERE COME ZEBI AND YOBI" (Press release). International Electrotechnical Commission. 2005-08-15. {{cite press release}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  20. ^ "IEEE-SA STANDARDS BOARD STANDARDS REVIEW COMMITTEE (RevCom) MEETING AGENDA". 2005-03-19. Retrieved 2007-02-25. 1541-2002 (SCC14) IEEE Trial-Use Standard for Prefixes for Binary Multiples [No negative comments received during trial-use period, which is now complete; Sponsor requests elevation of status to full-use.] Recommendation: Elevate status of standard from trial-use to full-use. Editorial staff will be notified to implement the necessary changes. The standard will be due for a maintenance action in 2007. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  21. ^ System/360 Model 91
  22. ^ The Product Line Card unambiguously uses MB to characterize HDD capacity in millions of bytes
  23. ^ 1977 Disk/Trend Report - Rigid Disk Drives, published June 1977
  24. ^ "Definition of megabyte" (html).
  25. ^ "Definitions of Megabyte on Dictionnary.com"" (html).
  26. ^ "AskOxford: megabyte" (html).
  27. ^ a b "§3.1 SI prefixes". The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (in French/English) (8th edition ed.). Paris: STEDI Media. 2006. pp. p. 127. ISBN 92-822-2213-6. Retrieved 2007-02-25. [Side note:] These SI prefixes refer strictly to powers of 10. They should not be used to indicate powers of 2 (for example, one kilobit represents 1000 bits and not 1024 bits). The IEC has adopted prefixes for binary powers in the international standard IEC 60027-2: 2005, third edition, Letter symbols to be used in electrical technology — Part 2: Telecommunications and electronics. The names and symbols for the prefixes corresponding to 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, and 260 are, respectively: kibi, Ki; mebi, Mi; gibi, Gi; tebi, Ti; pebi, Pi; and exbi, Ei. Thus, for example, one kibibyte would be written: 1 KiB = 210 B = 1024 B, where B denotes a byte. Although these prefixes are not part of the SI, they should be used in the field of information technology to avoid the incorrect usage of the SI prefixes. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  28. ^ IEEE Trial-Use Standard for Prefixes for Binary Multiples (PDF). New York. 2003-02-12. ISBN 0-7381-3386-8. Retrieved 2007-02-25. This standard is prepared with two goals in mind: (1) to preserve the SI prefixes as unambiguous decimal multipliers and (2) to provide alternative prefixes for those cases where binary multipliers are needed. The first goal affects the general public, the wide audience of technical and nontechnical persons who use computers without much concern for their construction or inner working. These persons will normally interpret kilo, mega, etc., in their proper decimal sense. The second goal speaks to specialists—the prefixes for binary multiples make it possible for persons who work in the information sciences to communicate with precision. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ a b Prefixes for Binary Multiples — The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty
  30. ^ Rules for SAE Use of SI (Metric) Units — Section C.1.12 — SI prefixes
  31. ^ HD 60027-2:2003 Information about the harmonization document (obtainable on order)
  32. ^ prEN 60027-2:2006 Information about the EN standardization process
  33. ^ "UNITS". Linux Programmer's Manual. 2001-12-22. Retrieved 2007-05-20. When the Linux kernel boots and says hda: 120064896 sectors (61473 MB) w/2048KiB Cache the MB are megabytes and the KiB are kibibytes. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  34. ^ "2.2 Block size". GNU Core Utilities manual. Free Software Foundation. 2002-12-28. Retrieved 2007-05-20. Integers may be followed by suffixes that are upward compatible with the SI prefixes for decimal multiples and with the IEC 60027-2 prefixes for binary multiples. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |quote= (help); line feed character in |quote= at position 37 (help)
  35. ^ "gparted-0.2 changelog". SourceForge. 2006-01-30. Retrieved 2007-05-20. changed KB/MB/GB/TB to KiB/MiB/GiB/TiB after reading http://www.iec.ch/zone/si/si_bytes.htm {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |quote= (help)
  36. ^ "IFCONFIG". Linux Programmer's Manual. 2005-06-30. Retrieved 2007-05-20. Since net-tools 1.60-4 ifconfig is printing byte counters and human readable counters with IEC 60027-2 units. So 1 KiB are 2^10 byte. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ "Deluge changeset". Retrieved 2007-06-13. proper prefix for size
  38. ^ Developer discussion
  39. ^ Binary vs. Decimal Measurements
  40. ^ JEDEC Solid State Technology Association (December 2002), "Terms, Definitions, and Letter Symbols for Microcomputers, Microprocessors, and Memory Integrated Circuits", JESD 100B.01
  41. ^ http://www.answers.com/topic/ckd
  42. ^ On January 6 2007, a check of the websites of Fujitsu, HGST, Samsung, Seagate, Toshiba and Western Digital showed these companies (representing virtually all of the HDD industry by unit volume) specify capacity with the SI prefix definitions.
  43. ^ a b ""Secure Digital Capacity Disclaimer"" (PDF). sandisk.com. SanDisk Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  44. ^ Tandon (Janurary1984). TM100-1, TM100-2 Flexible Disk Drives: Product Specification and User's Manual (PDF). Tandon Corporation. pp. pg 2-4. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  45. ^ IBM (May 1982). Disk Operating System by Microsoft (Version 1.1). IBM Corporation. pp. G-1. Some software applications "used with DOS 1.10, will operate with either two 160KB drives or two 320KB drives. Both drives MUST be of the same type…"
  46. ^ IBM (January 1983). Disk Operating System by Microsoft (Version 2.0). IBM Corporation. pp. A-2. "Beginning with DOS Version 2.00, DOS formats diskettes at 9 sectors per track, which increases capacity from 163,840 to 184,320 characters of information for single-sided diskettes and from 327,680 to 368,640 characters for dual-sided diskettes. The smaller capacity diskettes created by DOS Version 1.00 or DOS Version 1.10 (8 sectors per track) are also usable with DOS Version 2.00."
  47. ^ a b Apple Inc. (August 22, 1991). "Double-Density Versus High-Density Disks". Article ID: 3802. Apple Inc. Retrieved 2007-07-07. "This article gives the specifications for the 800K floppy disks and the1.4MB floppy disks." 800K Disk has 1600 sectors and 1.4MB Disk has 2880 sectors. A sector is 512 bytes.
  48. ^ Microsoft (May 6, 2003). "Determining Actual Disk Size: Why 1.44 MB Should Be 1.40 MB". Article ID: 121839. Microsoft. Retrieved 2007-07-07. "The 1.44-megabyte (MB) value associated with the 3.5-inch disk format does not represent the actual size or free space of these disks. Although its size has been popularly called 1.44 MB, the correct size is actually 1.40 MB."
  49. ^ Data capacity of CDs
  50. ^ Understanding Recordable and Rewritable DVD
  51. ^ ""Vreogh Third Amended Complaint (Case No. GCG-04-428953)"" (PDF). pddocs.com. Poorman-Douglas Corporation. 10 March 2005. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. ^ Safier, Seth A. "Frequently Asked Questions". Flash Memory Settlement. Poorman-Douglas Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  53. ^ Gutride, Adam (29 March 2006). ""Class Action Complaint"". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  54. ^ Zimmerman, Bernard (2006). ""Notice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement"". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  55. ^ Baskin, Scott D. (1 February 2006). ""Defendant Western Digital Corporation's Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval"". Orin Safier v. Western Digital Corporation. Western Digital Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
  56. ^ ""WD Caviar SE16 SATA Hard Drives"". Western Digital: Products. Western Digital Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-09.
  57. ^ Wong Yang, Debra (18 May 2006). ""Milberg Weiss Law Firm, Two Senior Partners Indicted in Secret Kickback Scheme Involving Named Plaintiffs in Class-Action Lawsuits"". Press Releases. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Further reading

Converters

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Binary_prefix&oldid=169002725"