Jump to content

Talk:Hotel Cecil, London: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kbthompson (talk | contribs)
{{WPLondon|class=stub|importance=low}}
Reedy Bot (talk | contribs)
Tagging (Kingbotk Plugin) Added {{WikiProject England}}, class=Stub, auto=yes. using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject England|class=Stub|auto=yes}}
{{WPLondon|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WPLondon|class=stub|importance=low}}



Revision as of 10:32, 11 November 2007

WikiProject iconEngland Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconLondon Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have just merged some information here from the Shell Mex House article. However, the two disagreed on two points. The Shell Mex article claimed the hotel opened in 1886 with 800+ rooms, while this article claimed it opened in 1896 with 600+ rooms. Other websites seem to give the 1886/800 figures, so I've gone with those, but anyone who has an authoritative reference would be wise to check and correct the article if necessary. — Haeleth Talk 13:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]