User talk:Pinkfloydfreak

Hello, and welcome to my talk page! You are welcome to post anything you wish here, and I'll try to be as prompt in my response as I can be! However, there are a few guidelines I expect you to follow:

• Be civil. Basically, don't scream for attention using personal attacks to offend me, and don't vandalize.
• Be BOLD. Don't be afraid of offending me or anything if you have a complaint about something I did. I actually want to hear it, so I can correct whatever mistake I may have made.
• Try to assume good faith. If I did something you view as offensive, I probably didn't mean to offend you, or anybody. Just tell me what it is and why it offends you, and I'll explain myself or improve it.
• Remember to sign your edits and include an edit summary. That way things can be better organized.
• If you give me respect, I'll give you respect.

Just try to follow these basic guidelines for posting here and you'll be fine. Pink Floyd

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pinkfloydfreak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Vandalism-only account? That's a lie! Check my contributions

Decline reason:

I don't see too many useful contributions from this account. Your edits to the user and talk pages of Bishonen (talk · contribs) and Ryulong (talk · contribs) clearly indicate vandalism. You also seem to be connected with JJGD (talk · contribs) and JJGD220 (talk · contribs). — Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 23:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing admin, note that this user claims to be banned vandal, Connell66 (talk · contribs), here. Also, see contributions such as this. --Yamla 23:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Pinkfloydfreak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

>:(

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=>:( |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=>:( |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=>:( |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}