Talk:Sciuridae: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Signing comment by 64.250.196.146 - "" |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
what is up people i have been on here what now what now??? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.250.196.146|64.250.196.146]] ([[User talk:64.250.196.146|talk]]) 22:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
what is up people i have been on here what now what now??? |
|||
Revision as of 22:03, 15 November 2007
 | Mammals: Pocket pets Redirect‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sciuridae redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
I think is a bad article. The classification is a bad one. Current classification includes the Petauristinae among the Sciurinae and instead uses the subfamilies Sciurillinae, Ratufinae, Xerinae and Callosciurinae. Ucucha See Mammal Taxonomy 16:07, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Disputed
I think the recent posting that "the factual accuracy of this article is disputed" is extreme. What's listed on the page is the most widely used taxonomic hypothesis. Recent molecular data do not support it and suggest that another hypothesis is required (such as what Ucucha lists above). This happens constantly with taxonomies. If we tag all articles where the taxonomy is disputed, those tags will go on almost every page that deals with biological organisms. --Aranae 15:08, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
what is up people i have been on here what now what now??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.250.196.146 (talk) 22:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)