Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Barbucci: Difference between revisions
Swerdnaneb (talk | contribs) |
Swerdnaneb (talk | contribs) →Antonio Barbucci: unsigned |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Modification coming today''' |
'''Modification coming today''' |
||
Barbucci's article will be immediately downgraded and rolled into a new article on the high temperature fuel cells research unit "Genoa Joint Laboratories." Thanks for the guidance, no intent to mislead the public. |
Barbucci's article will be immediately downgraded and rolled into a new article on the high temperature fuel cells research unit "Genoa Joint Laboratories." Thanks for the guidance, no intent to mislead the public. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Swilliams10|Swilliams10]] ([[User talk:Swilliams10|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Swilliams10|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
||
Revision as of 18:44, 17 November 2007
- Antonio Barbucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This academic seems to fail WP:PROF. He is a ricercatore at the University of Genoa (that corresponds roughly to lecturer in the UK system). As such he would certainly not be inherently notable. Other clear claims to notability were missing, so I added a PROD. The PROD was contested by the original author, and Barbucci was suddenly promoted to "professor" (on the wiki page, not at the university, as can be seen here). The article was expanded with more vague claims to notability, but none seems to be substantial enough for meeting WP:PROF. (His institution does not make him notable, nor does the fact that he lectures and publishes scientific papers - that's just the normal work of a researcher.) -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Modification coming today
Barbucci's article will be immediately downgraded and rolled into a new article on the high temperature fuel cells research unit "Genoa Joint Laboratories." Thanks for the guidance, no intent to mislead the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swilliams10 (talk • contribs)