Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockparty: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Actually logged in this time. Sorry about that.
Keep, it's notable enough and still a growing article.
Line 10: Line 10:
*:Nah, should redirect to [[block party]]. [[User:Chubbles|Chubbles]] ([[User talk:Chubbles|talk]]) 14:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
*:Nah, should redirect to [[block party]]. [[User:Chubbles|Chubbles]] ([[User talk:Chubbles|talk]]) 14:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' It is currently the largest demo party in North America and had presenters that are very notable in the demoscene. If this article deserves deletion, then you might as well delete every other party indicated on Wikipedia's [[List of demoparties]], as some are and were far smaller and less "notable" than Blockparty. --[[User:Froggy|Froggy]] ([[User talk:Froggy|talk]]) 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' It is currently the largest demo party in North America and had presenters that are very notable in the demoscene. If this article deserves deletion, then you might as well delete every other party indicated on Wikipedia's [[List of demoparties]], as some are and were far smaller and less "notable" than Blockparty. --[[User:Froggy|Froggy]] ([[User talk:Froggy|talk]]) 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Seems just as notable as any other demoparty, if not more -- firstly because it hasn't fizzled or flopped yet, secondly because it's in north america, which is something of an anomaly in the "scene". Perhaps the article could make a better case for notability, but deleting it before people have a chance to expand it would seem to throw the baby out with the bathwater. [[Special:Contributions/68.43.149.99|68.43.149.99]] ([[User talk:68.43.149.99|talk]]) 16:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:39, 19 November 2007

Blockparty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Doesn't seem notable to me. JöиÁ†ĥăИQuality, not quantity. 21:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]