Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockparty: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:05, 19 November 2007

Blockparty

Doesn't seem notable to me. JöиÁ †ĥăИ — Quality, not quantity. 21:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete No doubt the group exists and seems to be growing in popularity, but I can't see anything which defines it to be notable. scope_creep (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; it might end up notable someday, but it doesn't look like it's quite there yet. — Coren ^(talk) 04:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the unrelated Bloc Party. MLA (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, should redirect to block party. Chubbles (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is currently the largest demo party in North America and had presenters that are very notable in the demoscene. If this article deserves deletion, then you might as well delete every other party indicated on Wikipedia's List of demoparties, as some are and were far smaller and less "notable" than Blockparty. --Froggy (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems just as notable as any other demoparty, if not more -- firstly because it hasn't fizzled or flopped yet, secondly because it's in north america, which is something of an anomaly in the "scene". Perhaps the article could make a better case for notability, but deleting it before people have a chance to expand it would seem to throw the baby out with the bathwater. 68.43.149.99 (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete unnotable, unencyclopaedic topic. And yes, I will AfD the demo party other articles as well. — Aššur-bāni-apli (talk · contribs) 17:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, why don't you also add to the AfD pile the tens of thousands of articles on minor villages and cities that probably aren't "unencyclopaedic" as well? In fact, if this article isn't notable (which it is) you might as well delete three-fourths of Wikipedia's articles since they're likely not notable either. --Froggy (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep''' Seems just as notable as any other demoparty, if not more -- firstly because it hasn't fizzled or flopped yet, secondly because it's in north america, which is something of an anomaly in the "scene". Perhaps the article could make a better case for notability, but deleting it before people have a chance to expand it would seem to throw the baby out with the bathwater. [[Special:Contributions/68.43.149.99|68.43.149.99]] ([[User talk:68.43.149.99|talk]]) 16:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Strong Delete''' unnotable, unencyclopaedic topic. And yes, I will AfD the demo party other articles as well. &mdash; <small><small>[[User:EliasAlucard|Aššur-bāni-apli]]&nbsp;([[User talk:EliasAlucard|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/EliasAlucard|contribs]]) 17:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)</small></small>
+*:In that case, why don't you also add to the AfD pile the tens of thousands of articles on minor villages and cities that probably aren't "unencyclopaedic" as well?  In fact, if this article isn't notable (which it is) you might as well delete three-fourths of Wikipedia's articles since they're likely not notable either. --[[User:Froggy|Froggy]] ([[User talk:Froggy|talk]]) 18:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)