Jump to content

User talk:Redrocket: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Crockspot (talk | contribs)
IP vandal
No edit summary
Line 98: Line 98:
==IP vandal==
==IP vandal==
I reported that IP you just reverted on [[Sean Hannity]] to AIV. He already has had a "final warning" today on another article, and has a history of prior vandalism, including a week block. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] ([[User talk:Crockspot|talk]]) 00:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I reported that IP you just reverted on [[Sean Hannity]] to AIV. He already has had a "final warning" today on another article, and has a history of prior vandalism, including a week block. - [[User:Crockspot|Crockspot]] ([[User talk:Crockspot|talk]]) 00:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

==LGBT Characters==
FYI - Removed the "LGBT characters in comics" category from characters that are already listed in the "LGBT supervillains" or "LGBT superheroes" category. The LGBT supervillains/LGBT superheroes categories are sub-categories of the "LGBT characters in comics" category. No need to have the character listed in both the main category and sub-category. Thx.

Revision as of 21:08, 25 November 2007

BB 8 (US)

I don't mean to be a tattle tale, but Melanie refuses to discuss changes on the talk page. She's told me so, among other things. :/ Oh, and thank you for your message you left on my talk page. :) - Jeeny Talk 03:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the heads up. That's what I figured, but I thought I'd at least try and give her the benefit of the doubt. I'll stay vigilant. Thanks again for helping to keep the Big Brother 8 page cleaned up, we're hooked on that show. Snowfire51 03:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we're hooked. Don't get me wrong, I really believe Melanie is a good faith editor. She's not a vandal. She just likes to do things her way, and believes what she does is right, even if it's against consensus. :/ She's just stubborn, unlike me.[citation needed] :p - Jeeny Talk 04:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Moss

"There were rumors during the 2007 NFL Draft that the Patriots and the Green Bay Packers were the two teams most interested in acquiring Moss."

I will add that, i think the packers can be put like that in the Moss article and still keep it about Randy Moss —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think your paragraph there can be put in the Brett Favre page, in a controversy section, cuz he was frustrated right?? So it might be fit for the Favre page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I added the stuff to the Brett Favre page, check it out, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

Thanks for taking a look at the Favre article. Please do, if you have time, continue to watch it; the more eyes on it, the better! Skybunny 21:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond to the 3RR. There is an exception for community banned users, so I'll be stating the obvious, but it will save an administrator who is forced to sort this out a great deal of time. Best regards, Skybunny 04:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Replied to the 3RR. Thank you again for keeping an eye on things! Skybunny 05:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New sock

I found a new sock of User:Starwars1955, thought you would like to know since it has a canny resemblance to someone, User:Sncwfire51 haha this guy is getting creative now.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 04:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for the notice. He's hilarious. Snowfire51 04:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Haha yeah, I actually cracked a smile when I saw that :-)
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 04:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, be on the lookout for Jcsh M, Josh M, Josh M, etc... Snowfire51 04:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah also be on the lookout for anything close to Gonzo_fan2007, that is my username, Josh M is my "real name." Ill be on the lookout.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 05:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASU

Why wouldn't the ASU edit I did go in that spot? There was listing of the 30 game home win streak, wouldn't that streak being broken go in the same place? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsu08 (talkcontribs) 05:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same edit was put up a few days ago by an anonymous editor, and then taken down. I'd say offhand the streak was notable for the entire University, but the details of the streak ending were more notable to the season recap. I'd say the best thing to do would probably source the final game by finding an article that mentions it, then replacing it without the "whose house" bit, which seems unencyclopedic. Good luck! Snowfire51 07:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Brett Favre again

I understand. Personally I welcomed him because I had some inclinations that he may be our o'so favorite user. I figured it would be good to know he was being watched, and if it ended up he wasn't, then I could help him out. Personally I am just trying to get through the season, when the stats are set, and then just make sure every stat is correct. Thanks and good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 18:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no problem, Im a huge cheesehead so I enjoy it. I was really hoping that our favorite editor had given up, but sadly he came back. I cannot wait until the end of the season and we can get all his stats set and hopefully things will die down. Thanks for your help. Good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 03:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(banned editor comment removed)

What do you think of this user: User:Flashback1990? Looks a little fishy to me.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 02:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts about the statistics suggestions on the page, there? I'm wondering if a reorg is in order. Skybunny 05:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think only the top stats for Favre should be shown on his page. His numbers are so great that they threaten to overwhelm the entire article, and wikipedia is not just for stats and lists. I'd suppor cutting it down to the top 6-8 stats, whatever seems right, and just dropping the others. His legacy won't be his stats. Snowfire51 05:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Made the edit; please comment on the talk page of Brett Favre with any thoughts you have about the edit (so if you do like it, it's there for the sake of consensus). Thanks! Skybunny 05:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock

Here is the newest one User:Glenn Aulepp.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 20:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:New sock, new tactic

Speedy delete the page, block the users, and dont talk to him. He is banned and does not deserve to be spoken to. Keep up the good work.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 01:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha :-) thats kind of funny, thanks for catching it!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 02:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again...speedy deletion certainly called for. Thanks for the heads-up. Skybunny 02:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks for all your work. I appreciate it. Keep it up!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 02:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged this user as a sockpuppet of Starwars1955. Can you explain that one? I don't see the connection. -- Gogo Dodo 07:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Actually, I was unfamiliar with Starwars1955 until just now, but I can see the problem and the patterns. What a mess. =\ But going back to the topic at hand, I don't think that this other editor is fitting the pattern of abuse. While it is unusual for a new editor to jump right into a mess, I'm not entirely convinced that he is a sockpuppet. His only edit beforehand was a single test edit, while Starwars1955 seems to tend to jump right in with the insults, etc. I gave the editor the benefit of the doubt that he was just a knowledgeable anonymous lurker for now. -- Gogo Dodo 08:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: That's fine. I'm not saying you can't be wary as the edit pattern is unusual, but based upon the edits so far, I can not comfortably say that is or is not a sockpuppet. Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am, I'll be the first to put in a block.
Oh, I see that you left a note that the editor was seeking protection from me. I contacted him first, so he did not seek me out. -- Gogo Dodo 08:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I was just wondering if you had an email, I can be contacted a lot quicker by email than here if problems arise. I set up a dummy account Gonzo_fan2007@yahoo.com. If you send me your email then I can email you back from my real one. If you dont want to thats cool, I can usually be reached a lot quicker by email. Hope you have a good night.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 08:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re your message: I did some further looking at past history and I see what you mean. Anyways, it's good to be wary. We shall see. Have a good weekend! =) -- Gogo Dodo 08:40, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, the weekend passed without further incidents. Perhaps a lucky weekend? -- Gogo Dodo 21:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Barnstar

Thank you very much. - DrWarpMind (talk) 23:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP vandal

I reported that IP you just reverted on Sean Hannity to AIV. He already has had a "final warning" today on another article, and has a history of prior vandalism, including a week block. - Crockspot (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT Characters

FYI - Removed the "LGBT characters in comics" category from characters that are already listed in the "LGBT supervillains" or "LGBT superheroes" category. The LGBT supervillains/LGBT superheroes categories are sub-categories of the "LGBT characters in comics" category. No need to have the character listed in both the main category and sub-category. Thx.