Talk:Aër: Difference between revisions
m tagging |
m Reverted edits by BetacommandBot (talk) to last version by Daniel Case |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP Christianity|importance=|class=}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1= |
||
{{Project Catholicism|class=B |importance=low|nested=yes}} |
{{Project Catholicism|class=B |importance=low|nested=yes}} |
Revision as of 05:53, 26 November 2007
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Image Request
The article on OrthodoxWiki for Aer has a nice picture added by Wsk. I've added a request on that user's talk page to get permission to use the image on this page as well. Kylef81 22:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wsk changed the license to GFDL. I uploaded it and added it to this page. Kylef81 18:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Further Information
The introduction to the article ends with the following sentence:
The Aër is first mentioned by name in an explanation of the Divine Liturgy by a writer of the sixth century, and is also alluded to as "the so-called Aër" in the Acts of the Council of Constantinople.
Does anyone know who the sixth-century writer is? Does anyone know which Council of Constantinople is being referred to? There were several of them, and the link points only to the generic article on Ecumenical Councils. MishaPan 18:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Fashion?
Why on earth is this article considered to be "within the scope of {{WikiProject Fashion}}"? An Aër is not worn as a garment in its own right, nor is it influenced by trend. The use of the Aër is in no way "a personal mode of expression" (see Fashion). Because it is a liturgical item there is nothing "personal" about it. MishaPan 15:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- Unknown-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- B-Class Christianity articles
- WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- B-Class Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- Unknown-importance Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy articles