Jump to content

Bonini's paradox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mbawiz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mbawiz (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
This paradox is often used by researchers to explain why complete models of the human brain and thinking processes have not been created and will undoubtedly remain difficult for years to come.
This paradox is often used by researchers to explain why complete models of the human brain and thinking processes have not been created and will undoubtedly remain difficult for years to come.


This same paradox was observed earlier from a quote by [[Paul Valery]], "Everything simple is false. Everything which is complex is unusable." (Notre destin et les lettres, 1937)
This same paradox was observed earlier from a quote by [[Paul Valéry]], "Everything simple is false. Everything which is complex is unusable." (Notre destin et les lettres, 1937)


[[Category:Paradoxes]]
[[Category:Paradoxes]]

Revision as of 12:43, 30 April 2005

Bonini's Paradox explains the difficulty in constructing models or simulations that fully capture the workings of complex systems (such as the human brain).

Specifically, the paradox can be explained as follows: As a model of a complex system becomes more complete, it becomes less understandable. Alternatively, as a model grows more realistic, it also becomes just as difficult to understand as the real-world processes it represents (Dutton and Starbuck, 1971).

This paradox is often used by researchers to explain why complete models of the human brain and thinking processes have not been created and will undoubtedly remain difficult for years to come.

This same paradox was observed earlier from a quote by Paul Valéry, "Everything simple is false. Everything which is complex is unusable." (Notre destin et les lettres, 1937)