Talk:Percy Jackson & the Olympians: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:43, 30 November 2007

Novels: Fantasy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Race

Can anyone add 'Race' to character template that is being used by several pages of characters in this series? I feel it is important since the books deals with many types of cratures, from centaurs to demigods. (Emino 08:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Advance Copy

I am not a member of wikipedia and I have a question about whether something meets wikipedia's standatds. I work for a newspaper and, if an advanced copy of a book is not used for a book review, the reviewer puts them out where anyone can take them. The Titans Curse was one of these books. Would it meet wikipedia's standards to publish spoilers about the plot? Also, The Sea of Monsters should be further explained (as with The Lightning Theif). Could someone please elaborate on this.

Putting down spoilers for an unrealeased book would probably be unnecessary, as it would ruin the plot for many. The earliest day I would adivise adding this would be May 5th, 2007. We are trying our best. Thank You. I hope this helps.

It does. I will wait until then. Thanks!

You are welcome. --Geracudd 00:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manticore

Could someone please cite a source saying the Manticore appears in the Titan's Curse.--Geracudd 01:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah thats why u read the book idiot

I need a source for something that specific.--Geracudd 21:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Return of the Gorgon?

Again, source please. I don't know where you got the idea that was the name.--Geracudd 13:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title for Book 4

The title has yet to be released by the author although an update is posted to Rick Riordan's blog http://rickriordan.blogspot.com/2007/04/percy-four-update.html Please note the Gorgon thing is nonsense.

Thanks. I suspected as much.--Geracudd 00:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

third book

the third book is out and the article is nothing but a few hints to the 1st three chapters!

y not

Y not put a little description 4 da gods coz da hyperlink sucks!Cheeseballface 19:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movie!

The IMDB Site is not good, you have to signup for a pay account. Thus, for non-paying people it is an irrelevant source. Should I remove it? Chanceeastham (talk) 03:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 03:42, 30 November 2007 edit Chanceeastham (talk \| contribs) 22 edits →Movie!: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:43, 30 November 2007 edit undo Chanceeastham (talk \| contribs) 22 edits →Movie! Next edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:
	== Movie! ==		== Movie! ==

	The IMDB Site is not good, you have to signup for a pay account. Thus, for non-paying people it is an irrelevant source. I ~~shall~~ remove it, ~~any~~ ~~objections?~~		The IMDB Site is not good, you have to signup for a pay account. Thus, for non-paying people it is an irrelevant source. Should I remove it? [[User:Chanceeastham\|Chanceeastham]] ([[User talk:Chanceeastham\|talk]]) 03:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)