Jump to content

Talk:Malvales: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BotanyBot (talk | contribs)
m Adding WP:PLANTS project banner
MrDarwin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


See lengthy discussion under [[Talk:Malvaceae]] with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. [[User:MrDarwin|MrDarwin]] 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
See lengthy discussion under [[Talk:Malvaceae]] with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. [[User:MrDarwin|MrDarwin]] 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

==Addendum==

As a rather late addendum to the circumscription issues, I just got a copy of the new "Flowering Plant Families of the World" by Heywood et al. They maintain Malvaceae in a strict sense, but only by splitting the "core Malvales" rather finely into a series of smaller and narrowly defined families (Bombacaceae, Byttneriaceae, Brownlowiaceae, Durionaceae, Helicteraceae, Malvaceae, Pentapetaceae, Sparrmanniaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Tiliaceae); while the "traditional" core Malvalean families are recognized, they are defined by Heywood et al. much more narrowly than in traditional classifications. [[User:MrDarwin|MrDarwin]] 16:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:25, 30 November 2007

WikiProject iconPlants Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

See lengthy discussion under Talk:Malvaceae with regard to Malvaceae s.l. vs. Tiliaceae, Bombacaceae, and Sterculiaceae. MrDarwin 14:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum

As a rather late addendum to the circumscription issues, I just got a copy of the new "Flowering Plant Families of the World" by Heywood et al. They maintain Malvaceae in a strict sense, but only by splitting the "core Malvales" rather finely into a series of smaller and narrowly defined families (Bombacaceae, Byttneriaceae, Brownlowiaceae, Durionaceae, Helicteraceae, Malvaceae, Pentapetaceae, Sparrmanniaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Tiliaceae); while the "traditional" core Malvalean families are recognized, they are defined by Heywood et al. much more narrowly than in traditional classifications. MrDarwin 16:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]