User talk:GRBerry/Archive 8: Difference between revisions
set up next archive |
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) m Automated archival of 2 sections from User talk:GRBerry |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User talk:GRBerry/Archive Header}} |
{{User talk:GRBerry/Archive Header}} |
||
<span id="63318752490" /> |
|||
== PR - mentorship where == |
|||
i appreciate your attempts to keep things preventative, rather than merely punitive. however, i don't quite follow your reasoning that about this issue [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJaakobou&diff=&oldid=]. this issue has been repeating itself for at least 3 months and already both his mentors (discounting the sock) and a good number of more editors noted the user to stop. i believe PR is more than aware of what he is doing but he keeps trying, just as he kept calling me a war criminal <u>''after''</u> an ANI about that issue was already open. so, personally, i've lost my patience and i'm more than interested in <u>preventative</u> action. post-ANI link [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents/PR#repetition_-_mentorship_where.3F] (clarifies current issue). <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 07:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:You and he have a dispute. The two of you need to solve it. You can find a way to work amicably together (best), you can find a way to ignore each other (acceptable), or you can both end up in advanced forms of dispute resolution. I think if you go the third path, both of you will end up under sanctions. My advice is to either find a way for each of you to ignore the other, or to find a way to work together. I'd recommend you both practice [[Wikipedia:Writing for the enemy]]. [[User:GRBerry|GRBerry]] 13:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::''"You and he have a dispute."'' - honestly, you've left me speechless. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 22:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<span id="63318735810" /> |
|||
==Sokolče== |
|||
Hi, why did You revert back incorrect redirect Sokolče-Sokolce? It is usually and due to logic that we have redirects like |
|||
Zilina-Žilina, Kosice-Košice, Roznava-Rožňava, but make it in opposite way ? We have in Slovakia town Zvolen, so I can make redirects: Žvolen-Zvolen, Zvoleň-Zvolen, Zvolén-Zvolen, Žvoleň-Zvolen, etc... ? Please, delete that, that was created as mistake by non-Slovak user, it is not just incorrect, but also confusing, because in Slovakia existed real village Sokolče (now inundated) and we noticed it in article of [[Stan Mikita]], who was born there. Nice day and thank You for understanding --[[User:Kelovy|kelovy]] 17:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:17, 2 December 2007
- Archive 1: April 20 to June 26, 2006
- Archive 2: June 27 to September 10, 2006
- Archive 3: September 11 to December 30, 2006
At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bots, so in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.
- Archive 4: December 31, 2006 to January 27, 2007
- Archive 5: January 31, 2007 to May 31, 2007
- Archive 6: June 1, 2007 to September 1, 2007
- Archive 7: September 2, 2007 to October 29, 2007
- Archive 8: October 30, 2007 to December 31, 2007
- Archive 9: January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
- Archive 10: April 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008
- Archive 11: September 1, 2008 to ongoing
PR - mentorship where
i appreciate your attempts to keep things preventative, rather than merely punitive. however, i don't quite follow your reasoning that about this issue [1]. this issue has been repeating itself for at least 3 months and already both his mentors (discounting the sock) and a good number of more editors noted the user to stop. i believe PR is more than aware of what he is doing but he keeps trying, just as he kept calling me a war criminal after an ANI about that issue was already open. so, personally, i've lost my patience and i'm more than interested in preventative action. post-ANI link [2] (clarifies current issue). JaakobouChalk Talk 07:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- You and he have a dispute. The two of you need to solve it. You can find a way to work amicably together (best), you can find a way to ignore each other (acceptable), or you can both end up in advanced forms of dispute resolution. I think if you go the third path, both of you will end up under sanctions. My advice is to either find a way for each of you to ignore the other, or to find a way to work together. I'd recommend you both practice Wikipedia:Writing for the enemy. GRBerry 13:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- "You and he have a dispute." - honestly, you've left me speechless. JaakobouChalk Talk 22:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Sokolče
Hi, why did You revert back incorrect redirect Sokolče-Sokolce? It is usually and due to logic that we have redirects like Zilina-Žilina, Kosice-Košice, Roznava-Rožňava, but make it in opposite way ? We have in Slovakia town Zvolen, so I can make redirects: Žvolen-Zvolen, Zvoleň-Zvolen, Zvolén-Zvolen, Žvoleň-Zvolen, etc... ? Please, delete that, that was created as mistake by non-Slovak user, it is not just incorrect, but also confusing, because in Slovakia existed real village Sokolče (now inundated) and we noticed it in article of Stan Mikita, who was born there. Nice day and thank You for understanding --kelovy 17:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)