Jump to content

Little Nicky (cat): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Ardyn (talk | contribs)
Added information on hydrophilic behavior in Maine Coons
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Little Nicky''' (born [[October 17]], [[2004]]) is the first commercially-produced cat [[Clone (genetics)|clone]]. He was produced from the [[DNA]] of a 17-year-old cat named Nicky who died in 2003. Little Nicky's owner, a north [[Texas]] woman named Julie (her last name was not released) who paid $50,000 to have Nicky cloned, claimed that Little Nicky's behavior is similar to that of her late cat Nicky, including an unusual liking for water.
'''Little Nicky''' (born [[October 17]], [[2004]]) is the first commercially-produced cat [[Clone (genetics)|clone]]. He was produced from the [[DNA]] of a 17-year-old Maine Coon cat named Nicky who died in 2003. Little Nicky's owner, a north [[Texas]] woman named Julie (her last name was not released) who paid $50,000 to have Nicky cloned, claimed that Little Nicky's behavior is similar to that of her late cat Nicky, including an unusual liking for water, though [[hydrophilia|hydrophilic]] behavior is common for this breed[http://www.catsinfo.com/mainecoon.html].


The cloning operation was performed by the [[California]]-based company [[Genetic Savings & Clone]], which later closed in 2006.
The cloning operation was performed by the [[California]]-based company [[Genetic Savings & Clone]], which later closed in 2006.

Revision as of 19:34, 6 December 2007

Little Nicky (born October 17, 2004) is the first commercially-produced cat clone. He was produced from the DNA of a 17-year-old Maine Coon cat named Nicky who died in 2003. Little Nicky's owner, a north Texas woman named Julie (her last name was not released) who paid $50,000 to have Nicky cloned, claimed that Little Nicky's behavior is similar to that of her late cat Nicky, including an unusual liking for water, though hydrophilic behavior is common for this breed[1].

The cloning operation was performed by the California-based company Genetic Savings & Clone, which later closed in 2006.

The Humane Society and other animal welfare groups denounced the cloning, saying that the $50,000 could have been better used to save some of the millions of pets put to sleep each year.

The cat showed no negative side effects from the cloning and is alive and healthy.

See also