Jump to content

Vampire lifestyle: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 175866877 by Bob.weatherford (talk)The source is fictional/self-published or not scholarly. POV
Research is sound
Line 2: Line 2:


==Sanguinarians==
==Sanguinarians==
'''Definition'''


A Sanguinarian is a term used to describe beings (human in appearance and form, although some Sanguinarians might argue that they are not, in fact, humans but rather a different life form) that have an affection for or need of blood as a component of their diet and lifestyle. Sanguinarians can be classified as a subcategory of vampire, a term presently used to describe both those with an affinity for blood (Sanguinarians) and those that feed off of the life energy, or prana, of other individuals (psi-vamps or psychic vampires). Sanguinarians, because of their need for blood, more closely resemble the typical conception of what vampirism is to those less accustomed to vampiric culture. However, despite dispute over the specifics of what constitutes a vampire, the general culture accepts both blood thirsting and psi vampires as equal and valid forms. Sanguinarians will here be discussed, with particular emphasis on semantic disambiguation, community roles, religion, Renfield’s Syndrome, psychological roots, blood fetishes and eroticism, and individual cases of blood thirsting.
A '''sanguinarian''' is someone who feeds on blood. Taken from the Latin ''sanguineus'' meaning "blood-thirsty, Bloody or reddish in color", a sanguinarian is someone who has a physical thirst, perceived need, or craving for blood. This need is generally non-erotic in nature and distinguishable by the greater quantity required from the minimal amount consumed by [[blood fetish]]ists. Contrary to [[Energy vampire|Energy Vampires]], who claim to be able to sustain themselves on [[Prana|pranic]] energy or [[Qi|chi]] alone, sanguinarians believe they need to combine this with actual, physical blood in order to get any benefit from it. A sanguinarian or "sang" vampyre feels a strong craving to meet their energy needs by consuming blood. Normally this comes from other humans. They feel that their strength cannot be maintained at a high level in any other way. <ref>http://www.house-eclipse.org/dictionary/s.shtml</ref>
Sanguinarianism is not '''Renfield Syndrome''' (also known as clinical vampirism) since the urge achieves no end in Renfield's Syndrome, whereas it tends to have a profound affect on sanguinarians. Sanguinarians also have no desire to drink their own blood, whereas those with Renfield's Syndrome do.


'''Semantic Disambiguation'''
Some people believe that the sanguinarian condition is simply an [[addiction]] to blood, whilst others believe it is a creation of the mind (psychosomatic) and not a medical condition. Both of these viewpoints are derived from the belief that the condition of sanguinarianism is a want and not an actual ''need''.


Although the vampire culture has not achieved a consensus on the matter, some vampires self-identify with the spelling of “vampyre” with a “y” to distinguish between the mythical creatures of horror stories (“vampires”) and individuals with a lust for blood or energy (“vampyres”). This differentiation is seen as vital to some vampires in order to emphasize the inborn nature of the condition and the reality that it is. The new spelling is a way of alerting the world to the present existence of Sanguinarians and other vampires as something more than fictional characters. <ref>“Vampyrism Glossary of Terms.” Religious Tolerance. 24 August 2007. Ontario Consultants
[[Autovampirism]] (the drinking of one's own blood) is not seen as providing a sanguinarian with any energy, since the energy is just being recycled back into the system of the sanguinarian. It is frowned upon by many in the community, who see it as a destructive act that provides no benefit. <ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.trueformwithin.org/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=34| publisher=TrueForm Within| work=| title=Sanguinarian Vampires|date=| accessdate=2007-11-10| last=| first=Sarasvati}}</ref>
on Religious Tolerance. 24 October 2007.
</ref>. However, some Sanguinarians and other vampires who feel that the condition is inborn prefer to refer to themselves as “vampires” while using the word “vampyre” for those who may be “role-playing” or experimenting with the idea of living a vampiric lifestyle but who do not have an absolute need for blood (Sanguinarius). Specific terminology, as is seen here, varies greatly depending on the community and the individual, and for the sake of propriety and accuracy, the question of which spelling is preferred should be asked with all encounters of Sanguinarians.


'''Community Roles'''
Most sanguinarians believe sanguinarianism is a natural (but poorly documented) medical condition, one they are born with. Sanguinarianism also states that the condition is not hereditary, and in most instances the parents are not sanguinarians themselves. Some believe that they generally 'awaken' during puberty, sometimes earlier, sometimes later, but each case is unique.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.trueformwithin.org/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=47&Itemid=31| publisher=TrueForm Within| work=| title=Coming Out Of The "Coffin" | accessdate=2007-11-10| last=| first=Vampirekitten}}</ref> Others believe one has to be 'turned' (converted) into a sanguinarian through one of the processes mentioned in modern vampire mythology. Also note that some sanguinarians also believe that you cannot 'turn' someone into a sanguinarian.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.trueformwithin.org/site/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=63&Itemid=34| publisher=TrueForm Within| work=| title=Sanguinarian Vampires|date=| accessdate=2007-11-10| last=| first=Sarasvati}}</ref>


“Blood is not only the most vital of bodily fluids, but also the most metaphorical”<ref>Gayford, Martin. “Bleeding Miraculous Blood Will Tell: It Permeates our Bodies, our Histories,
Since many sanguinarians view themselves as being the source of vampires myth, some believe that sanguinarianism brings with it some of the physical features present in vampire myth. These can include long canines (some say this is just coincidental, and not all sanguinarians have long canine teeth.), aversion to sunlight, a pale complexion, and a high tolerance for pain. It should be noted that neither pale complexion or aversion to sunlight is particularly prevalent in pre-modern vampire myths.
our Cultures, and our Religions.” Sunday Telegraph. [London]. 2 December 2001: 9.
</ref>. Sanguinarians derive their life force, strength, and community from blood, and it is thus vital to them to have a consistent blood source. The name for the individual who supplies the blood is the donor. Sanguinarians rarely choose other blood-thirsting vampires to be their donors as this would be illogical; the very substance that they need is not something that they will then give away. The selection of donors, therefore, typically comes from within the close friend circle and contacts of Sanguinarians. Donors typically “occupy a lower rung in the vampire society and are expected to be submissive and at the vampire’s beck and call”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>. However, because the donor is the life source for the Sanguinarian, it is obviously in the Sanguinarian’s best interest to treat the donor with much respect and goodwill, as typically occurs.

Within the vampire culture there are various other roles, most of which are given a name to place them within the community. A “black swan” is a non-vampire that is supportive of the vampire community, for example. Conversely, a “white swan” is a non-vampire that opposes the vampiric community. A “slayer,” as is more commonly seen in entertainment depictions of vampirism, is someone who seeks to kill vampires, and could thus similarly be termed a form of “white swan”<ref>“Vampyrism Glossary of Terms.” Religious Tolerance. 24 August 2007. Ontario Consultants
on Religious Tolerance. 24 October 2007.
<http://www.religioustolerance.org/vampire5.htm>.
</ref>. A “slayer” can also be a person affiliated with “a Christian counter-movement…that actively opposes the vampire subculture and its beliefs and practices”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>. A “kitra” is someone who is both a donor and a Sanguinarian, and due to the logical difficulties of playing both roles is therefore rather rare.

The adjectives describing the vampire culture’s “swans,” these non-vampiric people that either oppose or support the community, highlight the importance of the dark and Gothic to Sanguinarians. The “black swan,” a being of darkness (as designated by the name), is a supporter of the group, just as a “white swan” is a detractor. The entire Sanguinarian lifestyle can therefore be seen as an embracing of the dark components of life, the counterculture to the light.

'''Religion and Sanguinarians'''

Sanguinarianism is not a religion or spirituality but is rather a state of being. Thus, Sanguinarians come from many different ideological and theological backgrounds. Many regard themselves as Satanists, due in part to the obsession with the dark side of life and being a counterculture in a dominantly religious, dogmatic, light-seeking world. One case of such an intertwining between vampirism and occultism received media publicity due to the political nature of the man involved. Jonathan Sharkey, running to be the governor of Minnesota, “describes himself on his campaign website as a Satanic Dark Priest, Sanguinarian Vampyre and Hecate Witch”<ref>“The Bottom Line.” San Antonio Express News. [San Antonio, Texas]. 23 January 2006: B5.</ref>. Occult vampires such as Sharkey further the view that vampirism and occult belief and practice are inextricably linked, even though this is false.

After Richard Noll attempted to explain vampirism in terms of its psychological causes and effects, it left the realm of dark religion and became “no longer the province of the exorcist or the demonologist but of the psychiatrist"<ref>Introvigne, Massimo. “Satanism Scares and Vampirism from the 18th Century to the
Contemporary Anti-Cult Movement.” Center for Studies on New Religions. Nov. 2007.
<http://www.cesnur.org/testi/vampires_wdc.htm>.
</ref>. Thus, today, Sanguinarianism has no direct links to occult religion or Satanism, despite many Sanguinarians’ participation in such religions.

Although typically seen as a countermovement to Christianity, Sanguinarianism is not exclusively anti-Christian. In fact, David Keyworth notes that approximately 31% of Sanguinarians profess religious faith in Christianity<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>. While some Christians and Sanguinarians alike see the two as being complete opposites along a religious and practical spectrum, some Sanguinarians believe there is substantial grounding for their practice within Christian theology. A few Sanguinarians even cite religious texts as being overtly blood-lustful. One in particular is John 6: 54, which states that “Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life”<ref>Holy Bible: King James Version. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints, 1979.
</ref>. “The mystic transubstantiation by which Christ's blood becomes wine at the Christian Eucharist” is also cited as a blood-drinking Christian practice<ref>Gayford, Martin. “Bleeding Miraculous Blood Will Tell: It Permeates our Bodies, our Histories,
our Cultures, and our Religions.” Sunday Telegraph. [London]. 2 December 2001: 9.
</ref>. Conversely, however, are scriptures such as Acts 15:29, which state that Christians “shall do well” to keep themselves “from blood”<ref>Holy Bible: King James Version. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints, 1979.
</ref>. Thus, the Christian spectrum on blood-drinking is largely ambiguous and allows for Sanguinarians and slayers within and without the religion.

'''Renfield's Syndrome'''

Although not recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), Richard Noll coined the phrase “Renfield’s Syndrome” to describe the clinical condition that he believes thirsting for blood is. The term was derived from the classic Dracula, a novel by Bram Stoker with a character by the name of Renfield. Although Noll believes that few self-proclaimed vampires actually have the syndrome (the rest are simply engaging in a “bizarre form of role-play and psychodrama”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>), he does describe the symptoms of the syndrome and the various stages that lead to its development. According the Noll, Renfield’s Syndrome includes:

1. The pivotal point of change when a Sanguinarian begins to drink blood, typically beginning by drinking his/her own after a scratch or cut

2. A progression through various blood drinking stages, starting with auto-vampirism (drinking one’s own blood), followed by zoophagia (drinking animal blood) and then vampirism itself, which may entail obtaining another’s blood by consent, thievery (from a blood bank), or other method

3. A sexual component related to drinking blood (see “Blood Fetishes and Eroticism”)

4. The mystical significance of drinking blood as a source of power and wellbeing

When these components are present, the term can accurately be termed Renfield’s Syndrome, according to Noll<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>.
The question as to the validity of Renfield’s Syndrome and its effects on Sanguinarians is unknown and disputed.

'''Psychological Roots'''

As stated above, vampirism (or Sanguinarianism) does not appear as a recognized psychiatric illness in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). The reason for this is subject to much speculation, but the arguments of cause and choice are certainly a component. For example, there is significant debate over the causes of vampirism. Many psychologists believe it to be the result of “a disturbed upbringing which includes abuse, neglect, alienation, and abandonment”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>. Similarly, it is noted that a supposed need or desire for blood may actually be a misplaced desire for love. The psychological process used to explain the formation of vampirism is as follows:

1. A traumatic event triggers the first act of vampirism, such as drinking the blood from a wound

2. Finding solace in this act, that child continues to let his own blood and drink it

3. Self-mutilation, animal blood drinking, or obtaining blood from others becomes a main pursuit

4. While feeling confused or guilty about these behaviors, the individual may find an online community of other self-proclaimed Sanguinarians and thus “realize” the inborn nature of their condition

5. The individual subsequently adopts the culture and the label of “Sanguinarian,” thus perpetuating the cycle of creating Sanguinarians

A Sanguinarian himself would most likely not believe this psychological model for explaining the nature of their being, as Keyworth notes. “Traumatic childhood development is usually rejected by Sanguinarians as an etiological explanation for their condition”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
</ref>. More research will need to be conducted before it can be conclusively said if being a Sanguinarian is within the control of the individual.

'''Blood Fetishes and Eroticism'''

A common psychological belief to explain the phenomenon that Sanguinarians are is to describe their lust for blood as an aberrant form of sexuality. Sanguinarianism is noted to be sadomasochistic in nature. Blood itself is considered erotic to many Sanguinarians, as well, and can be an important portion in their sexual lives. Keyworth notes that “eroticism has become so entwined with the contemporary vampire scene that popular vampire magazines…include previews of the latest vampire pornography, featuring combined acts of sex and blood-letting”<ref>Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire
Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370
</ref>. Although the two are not necessarily contingent upon each other, the sexual and blood-drinking aspects of a Sanguinarian’s life typically intertwine.

'''Individual Cases'''

Most modern day Sanguinarians have found methods of coping and thriving within their various societal constructs. Communities form online as supportive measures, and through careful selection, a Sanguinarian may find different people to fill the various needed roles to sustain the practice.
Unfortunately, some modern day cases of Sanguinarian related violence have shed a bad light upon the practice and community. Mathew Hardman was one such example, a man who killed his 90 year-old neighbor. “Officers searched Hardman's bedroom, where they found books, magazines and internet material devoted to vampires”<ref>Horsnell, Michael. “Murderer Obsessed with the Black Arts.” The Times. [London]. 3 August
2002: 5.
</ref>. Similarly, the case of Tracy Wigginton, a “vampire-like creature who drank blood,” created an unfortunate link between blood-drinking and violence when she stabbed to death an innocent man to drink his blood<ref>“ ‘Lesbian Vampires’ Sentenced: Court Told Killer Looked ‘Almost Satisfied…Like a Person
Would Look if They Had Just Sat Down to a Three-Course Dinner’.” Vancouver Sun.
[Vancouver, British Columbia]. 16 February 1991: A11.
</ref>. Additionally, Wigginton acted “to frighten the living hell” out of her victim<ref>“ ‘Lesbian Vampires’ Sentenced: Court Told Killer Looked ‘Almost Satisfied…Like a Person
Would Look if They Had Just Sat Down to a Three-Course Dinner’.” Vancouver Sun.
[Vancouver, British Columbia]. 16 February 1991: A11.
</ref>, further exacerbating the violence in which she satisfied her blood thirst. However, it is important to note that these cases receive attention because they are marginal. The majority of Sanguinarians lead healthy lives and are unknown to the popular media.


==Psychic vampires==
==Psychic vampires==

Revision as of 19:36, 6 December 2007

The vampire lifestyle (or vampyre subculture) is a dark alternative lifestyle, based off of vampires. It has been noted that the Vampire subculture has stemmed largely from the Goth subculture,[1] but also incorporates some elements of the S/M subculture.[2] Active vampirism within the vampire subculture includes both blood related vampirism, which is commonly referred to as Sanguinarian Vampirism, and Psychic Vampirism, which involves 'feeding' from pranic energy. Members of the subculture take on a variety of 'roles', including both "vampires" and their sources of blood or pranic energy.[3]

Sanguinarians

Definition

A Sanguinarian is a term used to describe beings (human in appearance and form, although some Sanguinarians might argue that they are not, in fact, humans but rather a different life form) that have an affection for or need of blood as a component of their diet and lifestyle. Sanguinarians can be classified as a subcategory of vampire, a term presently used to describe both those with an affinity for blood (Sanguinarians) and those that feed off of the life energy, or prana, of other individuals (psi-vamps or psychic vampires). Sanguinarians, because of their need for blood, more closely resemble the typical conception of what vampirism is to those less accustomed to vampiric culture. However, despite dispute over the specifics of what constitutes a vampire, the general culture accepts both blood thirsting and psi vampires as equal and valid forms. Sanguinarians will here be discussed, with particular emphasis on semantic disambiguation, community roles, religion, Renfield’s Syndrome, psychological roots, blood fetishes and eroticism, and individual cases of blood thirsting.

Semantic Disambiguation

Although the vampire culture has not achieved a consensus on the matter, some vampires self-identify with the spelling of “vampyre” with a “y” to distinguish between the mythical creatures of horror stories (“vampires”) and individuals with a lust for blood or energy (“vampyres”). This differentiation is seen as vital to some vampires in order to emphasize the inborn nature of the condition and the reality that it is. The new spelling is a way of alerting the world to the present existence of Sanguinarians and other vampires as something more than fictional characters. [4]. However, some Sanguinarians and other vampires who feel that the condition is inborn prefer to refer to themselves as “vampires” while using the word “vampyre” for those who may be “role-playing” or experimenting with the idea of living a vampiric lifestyle but who do not have an absolute need for blood (Sanguinarius). Specific terminology, as is seen here, varies greatly depending on the community and the individual, and for the sake of propriety and accuracy, the question of which spelling is preferred should be asked with all encounters of Sanguinarians.

Community Roles

“Blood is not only the most vital of bodily fluids, but also the most metaphorical”[5]. Sanguinarians derive their life force, strength, and community from blood, and it is thus vital to them to have a consistent blood source. The name for the individual who supplies the blood is the donor. Sanguinarians rarely choose other blood-thirsting vampires to be their donors as this would be illogical; the very substance that they need is not something that they will then give away. The selection of donors, therefore, typically comes from within the close friend circle and contacts of Sanguinarians. Donors typically “occupy a lower rung in the vampire society and are expected to be submissive and at the vampire’s beck and call”[6]. However, because the donor is the life source for the Sanguinarian, it is obviously in the Sanguinarian’s best interest to treat the donor with much respect and goodwill, as typically occurs.

Within the vampire culture there are various other roles, most of which are given a name to place them within the community. A “black swan” is a non-vampire that is supportive of the vampire community, for example. Conversely, a “white swan” is a non-vampire that opposes the vampiric community. A “slayer,” as is more commonly seen in entertainment depictions of vampirism, is someone who seeks to kill vampires, and could thus similarly be termed a form of “white swan”[7]. A “slayer” can also be a person affiliated with “a Christian counter-movement…that actively opposes the vampire subculture and its beliefs and practices”[8]. A “kitra” is someone who is both a donor and a Sanguinarian, and due to the logical difficulties of playing both roles is therefore rather rare.

The adjectives describing the vampire culture’s “swans,” these non-vampiric people that either oppose or support the community, highlight the importance of the dark and Gothic to Sanguinarians. The “black swan,” a being of darkness (as designated by the name), is a supporter of the group, just as a “white swan” is a detractor. The entire Sanguinarian lifestyle can therefore be seen as an embracing of the dark components of life, the counterculture to the light.

Religion and Sanguinarians

Sanguinarianism is not a religion or spirituality but is rather a state of being. Thus, Sanguinarians come from many different ideological and theological backgrounds. Many regard themselves as Satanists, due in part to the obsession with the dark side of life and being a counterculture in a dominantly religious, dogmatic, light-seeking world. One case of such an intertwining between vampirism and occultism received media publicity due to the political nature of the man involved. Jonathan Sharkey, running to be the governor of Minnesota, “describes himself on his campaign website as a Satanic Dark Priest, Sanguinarian Vampyre and Hecate Witch”[9]. Occult vampires such as Sharkey further the view that vampirism and occult belief and practice are inextricably linked, even though this is false.

After Richard Noll attempted to explain vampirism in terms of its psychological causes and effects, it left the realm of dark religion and became “no longer the province of the exorcist or the demonologist but of the psychiatrist"[10]. Thus, today, Sanguinarianism has no direct links to occult religion or Satanism, despite many Sanguinarians’ participation in such religions.

Although typically seen as a countermovement to Christianity, Sanguinarianism is not exclusively anti-Christian. In fact, David Keyworth notes that approximately 31% of Sanguinarians profess religious faith in Christianity[11]. While some Christians and Sanguinarians alike see the two as being complete opposites along a religious and practical spectrum, some Sanguinarians believe there is substantial grounding for their practice within Christian theology. A few Sanguinarians even cite religious texts as being overtly blood-lustful. One in particular is John 6: 54, which states that “Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life”[12]. “The mystic transubstantiation by which Christ's blood becomes wine at the Christian Eucharist” is also cited as a blood-drinking Christian practice[13]. Conversely, however, are scriptures such as Acts 15:29, which state that Christians “shall do well” to keep themselves “from blood”[14]. Thus, the Christian spectrum on blood-drinking is largely ambiguous and allows for Sanguinarians and slayers within and without the religion.

Renfield's Syndrome

Although not recognized in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), Richard Noll coined the phrase “Renfield’s Syndrome” to describe the clinical condition that he believes thirsting for blood is. The term was derived from the classic Dracula, a novel by Bram Stoker with a character by the name of Renfield. Although Noll believes that few self-proclaimed vampires actually have the syndrome (the rest are simply engaging in a “bizarre form of role-play and psychodrama”[15]), he does describe the symptoms of the syndrome and the various stages that lead to its development. According the Noll, Renfield’s Syndrome includes:

1. The pivotal point of change when a Sanguinarian begins to drink blood, typically beginning by drinking his/her own after a scratch or cut

2. A progression through various blood drinking stages, starting with auto-vampirism (drinking one’s own blood), followed by zoophagia (drinking animal blood) and then vampirism itself, which may entail obtaining another’s blood by consent, thievery (from a blood bank), or other method

3. A sexual component related to drinking blood (see “Blood Fetishes and Eroticism”)

4. The mystical significance of drinking blood as a source of power and wellbeing

When these components are present, the term can accurately be termed Renfield’s Syndrome, according to Noll[16]. The question as to the validity of Renfield’s Syndrome and its effects on Sanguinarians is unknown and disputed.

Psychological Roots

As stated above, vampirism (or Sanguinarianism) does not appear as a recognized psychiatric illness in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). The reason for this is subject to much speculation, but the arguments of cause and choice are certainly a component. For example, there is significant debate over the causes of vampirism. Many psychologists believe it to be the result of “a disturbed upbringing which includes abuse, neglect, alienation, and abandonment”[17]. Similarly, it is noted that a supposed need or desire for blood may actually be a misplaced desire for love. The psychological process used to explain the formation of vampirism is as follows:

1. A traumatic event triggers the first act of vampirism, such as drinking the blood from a wound

2. Finding solace in this act, that child continues to let his own blood and drink it

3. Self-mutilation, animal blood drinking, or obtaining blood from others becomes a main pursuit

4. While feeling confused or guilty about these behaviors, the individual may find an online community of other self-proclaimed Sanguinarians and thus “realize” the inborn nature of their condition

5. The individual subsequently adopts the culture and the label of “Sanguinarian,” thus perpetuating the cycle of creating Sanguinarians

A Sanguinarian himself would most likely not believe this psychological model for explaining the nature of their being, as Keyworth notes. “Traumatic childhood development is usually rejected by Sanguinarians as an etiological explanation for their condition”[18]. More research will need to be conducted before it can be conclusively said if being a Sanguinarian is within the control of the individual.

Blood Fetishes and Eroticism

A common psychological belief to explain the phenomenon that Sanguinarians are is to describe their lust for blood as an aberrant form of sexuality. Sanguinarianism is noted to be sadomasochistic in nature. Blood itself is considered erotic to many Sanguinarians, as well, and can be an important portion in their sexual lives. Keyworth notes that “eroticism has become so entwined with the contemporary vampire scene that popular vampire magazines…include previews of the latest vampire pornography, featuring combined acts of sex and blood-letting”[19]. Although the two are not necessarily contingent upon each other, the sexual and blood-drinking aspects of a Sanguinarian’s life typically intertwine.

Individual Cases

Most modern day Sanguinarians have found methods of coping and thriving within their various societal constructs. Communities form online as supportive measures, and through careful selection, a Sanguinarian may find different people to fill the various needed roles to sustain the practice.

Unfortunately, some modern day cases of Sanguinarian related violence have shed a bad light upon the practice and community. Mathew Hardman was one such example, a man who killed his 90 year-old neighbor. “Officers searched Hardman's bedroom, where they found books, magazines and internet material devoted to vampires”[20]. Similarly, the case of Tracy Wigginton, a “vampire-like creature who drank blood,” created an unfortunate link between blood-drinking and violence when she stabbed to death an innocent man to drink his blood[21]. Additionally, Wigginton acted “to frighten the living hell” out of her victim[22], further exacerbating the violence in which she satisfied her blood thirst. However, it is important to note that these cases receive attention because they are marginal. The majority of Sanguinarians lead healthy lives and are unknown to the popular media.

Psychic vampires

Dion Fortune wrote of psychic parasitism in relation to vampirism as early as 1930 (considering it a combination of psychic and psychological pathology) in "Psychic Self-Defense".[23][24] The term "psychic vampire" first gained attention in the 1960s with the publication of Anton LaVey's Satanic Bible. LaVey, who claimed to have coined the term,[25] used it to mean a spiritually or emotionally weak person who drains vital energy from other people. Adam Parfrey likewise attributed the term to LaVey in an introduction to The Devil's Notebook.

The theme of the psychic vampire has been a focus within modern Vampyre subculture. The way that the subculture has manipulated the image of the psychic vampire has been investigated by researchers such as Mark Benecke[26] and A. Asbjorn Jon.[27] Jon has noted that, like the traditional psychic vampires, those of Vampyre subculture 'prey[s] upon life-force or 'pranic' energy'.[28] Jon also noted that the group has been loosely linked to the Goth subculture.

Health Risks, Methodology & Life Style Practices

For one person to consume another's blood presents a serious hygiene risk to both parties, with a major risk of sepsis from human bites and the possibility of transmission of blood-borne diseases including HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis.[29][30] [31]

There is no general belief in the Sanguinarian community that one ever has a requirement to bite into their donor. The most common method mentioned involves the use of a sharp, thin, un-serrated, sterilized knife that is used to cut open the skin away from any dangerous points that could result in the (potentially fatal) damaging of parts of the human anatomy. The cut is usually as small as possible and the blood taken is rarely more than a couple of teaspoons worth at most. However blood can also be exacted from the body by the use of syringe, scalpel or medical lancet. Most vampires/sanguiarians carry with them one of these tools in a safe container and are disposed of safely after one use, however in the case of a knife re-sterilized.

Blood is taken from the wound in a gentle sucking motion, it is not usually lapped, as this can promote infection and cause pain to the other party. All wounds are self inflicted and a vampire would never make a wound in a donor as this could be seen as assault if the relationship ever soured.

The sensation of ingesting blood is different for all vampires, as is the frequency for the feed and the number of donors used. Hunger for a vampire is a longing beyond that of food and drink and cannot be slaked by either, however it can be subdued with coffee and other stimulants to a later time.

Vampires regularly check with donors about blood conditions in order not to fall prey to any blood borne disease and most are carefully selected through a process of meetings.

Donors (or bloodsharing partners)

A donor is someone who provides blood to a sanguinarian. They usually do so out of understanding of the condition, a fetish for blood, a fetish for subservience or similar reasons. Donors are almost invariably friends of the sanguinarian, since trust is essential in such an intimate and dangerous act and they must also take the time to get the donor's blood checked for common diseases. [32]

See also

References

  1. ^ Skal, David J. (1993). The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror. New York: Penguin. pp. p. 342-43. ISBN 0-14-024002-0. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  2. ^ A. Asbjorn Jon, 'The Psychic Vampire and Vampyre Subculture', in Australian Folklore, 12 (2002), pp,143-148 (p.145). http://www.une.edu.au/folklorejournal/ ISBN 1-86389-831-X
  3. ^ A. Asbjorn Jon, 'The Psychic Vampire and Vampyre Subculture', in Australian Folklore, 12 (2002), pp,143-148 (p.145). http://www.une.edu.au/folklorejournal/ ISBN 1-86389-831-X
  4. ^ “Vampyrism Glossary of Terms.” Religious Tolerance. 24 August 2007. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 24 October 2007.
  5. ^ Gayford, Martin. “Bleeding Miraculous Blood Will Tell: It Permeates our Bodies, our Histories, our Cultures, and our Religions.” Sunday Telegraph. [London]. 2 December 2001: 9.
  6. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  7. ^ “Vampyrism Glossary of Terms.” Religious Tolerance. 24 August 2007. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 24 October 2007. <http://www.religioustolerance.org/vampire5.htm>.
  8. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  9. ^ “The Bottom Line.” San Antonio Express News. [San Antonio, Texas]. 23 January 2006: B5.
  10. ^ Introvigne, Massimo. “Satanism Scares and Vampirism from the 18th Century to the Contemporary Anti-Cult Movement.” Center for Studies on New Religions. Nov. 2007. <http://www.cesnur.org/testi/vampires_wdc.htm>.
  11. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  12. ^ Holy Bible: King James Version. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1979.
  13. ^ Gayford, Martin. “Bleeding Miraculous Blood Will Tell: It Permeates our Bodies, our Histories, our Cultures, and our Religions.” Sunday Telegraph. [London]. 2 December 2001: 9.
  14. ^ Holy Bible: King James Version. Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1979.
  15. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  16. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  17. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  18. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370.
  19. ^ Keyworth, David. “The Socio-Religious Beliefs and Nature of the Contemporary Vampire Subculture.” Journal of Contemporary Religion. 17 (2002): 355-370
  20. ^ Horsnell, Michael. “Murderer Obsessed with the Black Arts.” The Times. [London]. 3 August 2002: 5.
  21. ^ “ ‘Lesbian Vampires’ Sentenced: Court Told Killer Looked ‘Almost Satisfied…Like a Person Would Look if They Had Just Sat Down to a Three-Course Dinner’.” Vancouver Sun. [Vancouver, British Columbia]. 16 February 1991: A11.
  22. ^ “ ‘Lesbian Vampires’ Sentenced: Court Told Killer Looked ‘Almost Satisfied…Like a Person Would Look if They Had Just Sat Down to a Three-Course Dinner’.” Vancouver Sun. [Vancouver, British Columbia]. 16 February 1991: A11.
  23. ^ Charles and Collins, Carr; The Story of Dion Fortune, Thoth Books, 1998, ISBN 1-870450-33-7, p150,
  24. ^ Fortune, Dion; Psychic Self-Defense, Weiser Books, 1930, ISBN 1-57863-151-3,
  25. ^ Robinson, Eugene (November 1986). "Anton LaVey". Birth of Tragedy. Retrieved 2007-03-31.
  26. ^ Mark Benecke and Aleksandra Blak, 'Vampire Youth Subculture in New York City', presented as a conference paper at the Second World Dracula Congress (Poiana Brasov, Romania: 24-28 May, 2000).
  27. ^ A. Asbjorn Jon, 'The Psychic Vampire and Vampyre Subculture', in Australian Folklore, 12 (2002), pp,143-148 (p.145). http://www.une.edu.au/folklorejournal/ ISBN 1-86389-831-X
  28. ^ A. Asbjorn Jon, 'The Psychic Vampire and Vampyre Subculture', in Australian Folklore, 12 (2002), pp,143-148 (p.145). http://www.une.edu.au/folklorejournal/ ISBN 1-86389-831-X
  29. ^ "Human Bites". American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. November 2002. Retrieved 2006-11-26.
  30. ^ Sowadsky, Rick (November 3, 1999). "Can you get HIV from drinking another persons blood?". Forum on Safe Sex and HIV Prevention. The Body. Retrieved 2006-11-26.
  31. ^ Lee, Ravena. "What Every Blood Drinker Should Know". TrueForm Within. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  32. ^ "Sanguinarian/Blood Feeding". TrueForm Within. Retrieved 2007-11-10. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help)

COVICA:

  • House Eclipse Dictionary: [1]

The Black Veil:

  • The Black Veil, 2nd Edition: [2]