User talk:Ttnrwtvl: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:15, 10 December 2007

POV edits to Regent University

I have reported you as POV-pushing in your edits to this article. I highly recommend that you read the Wikipedia policy on neutral point of view. You cannot delete well-sourced information from an article no matter how much you disagree with it. --GoodDamon 16:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

Please discuss any contentious edits IN ADVANCE on the article's talk page. Your current editing style is leaving you open to charges of wiki abuse, and you may be blocked for this. You will need evidence of collaboration not confrontation. Thank you, Ian Cairns (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC) (PS: I have no interest in the article, and am not even in the same country)[reply]

Your positive edits to the Regent University page

First, let me welcome you to the Wikipedia community. Your contributions to the Regent University page have done much to improve it and I encourage your continued participation in the project. As you are a new editor, it is common (for all of us) to at first not be aware of all of the core policies of Wikipedia. Although your contributions are positive, you should remember to avoid edit warring as a sterile exercise. I've been guilty of doing that in my time and have always found it more productive to discuss changes on the talk page vs. (say) deleting an entire section. Secondly, although your contributions were mostly accurate, you need to be sure to include verification of this information. If you go look at the current state at the page, I think you will see I incorporated most of your additions but a) included verification and b) rewrote some of the sections in a neutral voice. Verification, neutral point of view and no original research are the three core values of Wikipedia. Look also at the article's history page to see how I carefully explained all of my many edits.

Again, you have contributed well to the article and you are most welcome to continue. Bone up on these core policies and you will find that working in Wikipedia doesn't have to be (and shouldn't be) a contentious affair. Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 21:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regent University edits

Please check the edit summaries and history before making edits and adding duplicate information. Also, please source your additions, especially if you are word-for-word quoting, or it must be removed immediately as plagiarism. Collectonian (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, *please* continue with your additions to the article as you are contributing essential, missing elements. Thanks! ∴ Therefore | talk 18:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== November 2007 ==
-{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Regent University|, as you did to [[:Regent University]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 22:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Regent University|[[:Regent University]]|Wikipedia}}.  When removing text, please specify a reason in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [[Help:Page history|page history]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]].  If you disagree with the inclusion of those sections, please join in the discussion already on going on the talk page and contribute there. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 14:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please remember to mark your edits{{#if:Regent University|, such as your recent edits to [[:Regent University]],}} as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see [[Help:Minor edit]]). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette.  The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 14:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Regent University|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Regent University]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''If you continue to disregard the warnings about your recent edits to this article and ignoring requests that you discuss the Bush administration hires section on the talk page, you may be blocked from editing.'' [[User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[User talk:Collectonian|talk]]) 16:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] }}}Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Regent University|, as you did to [[:Regent University]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|left|30px]] }}}This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Regent University|, as you did to [[:Regent University]]}}, you '''will''' be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> ''Please discuss the changes you wish to make on the article's talk page instead of engaging in edit warring.'' --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 16:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 ==POV edits to [[Regent University]]==
 I have reported you as POV-pushing in your edits to this article. I highly recommend that you read the Wikipedia policy on [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. You cannot delete well-sourced information from an article no matter how much you disagree with it. --<font color="green">[[User:GoodDamon|Good]]</font>[[User_talk:GoodDamon|Damon]] 16:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)