Jump to content

Submittals (construction): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Epsilon60198 (talk | contribs)
fixed link to disambig. page.
RedSeyon (talk | contribs)
removed redtext
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Submittals in [[Construction Management]]''' are [[shop drawings]], [[material data]], and [[samples]]. Product data submittals, samples, and shop drawings are required primarily for the [[architect]] and [[engineer]] to verify that the correct products will be installed on the project.<ref>{{cite book| Authors = C. J. Anumba, A. N. Baldwin and D. Bouchlaghem | university = Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK | coauthors = A. F. Cutting-Decelle, J. Dufau and M. Mommessin | university = Université de Savoie-ESIGEC/LGCH, Domaine de Savoie-Technolac, le Bourget du Lac, France | coauthor2 = B. Prasad | institute = CERA Institute, Unigraphics Solutions, Tustin, CA, USA | title = Integrating Concurrent Engineering Concepts in a Steelwork Construction Project | journal = Concurrent Engineering | section = Research and Applications | volume = 8 | issue = 3 | pages = 199-210 | date = [[2000-05-05]]| publisher = Technomic Publishing Co. Inc. | url = http://www.lboro.ac.uk:80/departments/cv/projects/lexic/pdf/Integrating-CE-concepts-in-a-steelwork-construction-projectspdf.pdf| format = [[PDF]]| accessdate = 2007-02-16}}</ref>
'''Submittals in [[Construction Management]]''' are [[shop drawings]], material data, and [[samples]]. Product data submittals, samples, and shop drawings are required primarily for the [[architect]] and [[engineer]] to verify that the correct products will be installed on the project.<ref>{{cite book| Authors = C. J. Anumba, A. N. Baldwin and D. Bouchlaghem | university = Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK | coauthors = A. F. Cutting-Decelle, J. Dufau and M. Mommessin | university = Université de Savoie-ESIGEC/LGCH, Domaine de Savoie-Technolac, le Bourget du Lac, France | coauthor2 = B. Prasad | institute = CERA Institute, Unigraphics Solutions, Tustin, CA, USA | title = Integrating Concurrent Engineering Concepts in a Steelwork Construction Project | journal = Concurrent Engineering | section = Research and Applications | volume = 8 | issue = 3 | pages = 199-210 | date = [[2000-05-05]]| publisher = Technomic Publishing Co. Inc. | url = http://www.lboro.ac.uk:80/departments/cv/projects/lexic/pdf/Integrating-CE-concepts-in-a-steelwork-construction-projectspdf.pdf| format = [[PDF]]| accessdate = 2007-02-16}}</ref>


This process also gives the architect and [[sub-consultants]] the opportunity to select colors, [[patterns]], and types of material that were not chosen prior to completion of the [[Blueprints|construction drawings]]. This is not an occasion for the architect to select different materials than specified, but rather to clarify the selection within the quality level indicated in the [[specification]]. For materials requiring [[fabrication]], such as [[reinforcing steel]] and [[structural steel]], the architect and engineer need to verify details furnished by the [[fabricator]]. The contractor also uses this information in installation, using dimensions and installation data from the submittal. The [[construction documents]], specifically the [[technical specifications]], require the [[contractor]] to submit [[product data]], samples, and shop drawings to the architect and engineer for approval. This is one of the first steps that is taken by the contractor after execution of the construction contract and issuance of the "[[Notice to Proceed]]". The submittal process is very important, as it directly relates to the [[quality]], [[schedule]], and [[ultimately]] the overall success of the project. The submittal process can be complex, because there are literally thousands of different materials, fabrications, and equipment used in a construction project.
This process also gives the architect and sub-consultants the opportunity to select colors, [[patterns]], and types of material that were not chosen prior to completion of the [[Blueprints|construction drawings]]. This is not an occasion for the architect to select different materials than specified, but rather to clarify the selection within the quality level indicated in the [[specification]]. For materials requiring [[fabrication]], such as [[reinforcing steel]] and [[structural steel]], the architect and engineer need to verify details furnished by the [[fabricator]]. The contractor also uses this information in installation, using dimensions and installation data from the submittal. The construction documents, specifically the [[technical specifications]], require the [[contractor]] to submit product data, samples, and shop drawings to the architect and engineer for approval. This is one of the first steps that is taken by the contractor after execution of the construction contract and issuance of the "Notice to Proceed". The submittal process is very important, as it directly relates to the [[quality]], [[schedule]], and ultimately the overall success of the project. The submittal process can be complex, because there are literally thousands of different materials, fabrications, and equipment used in a construction project.


==Types of Submittals==
==Types of Submittals==
Line 8: Line 8:
The product data submittal usually consists of the [[manufacturer]]’s [[product]] [[information]]. The information included in this submittal are:
The product data submittal usually consists of the [[manufacturer]]’s [[product]] [[information]]. The information included in this submittal are:


*[[Manufacturer]], [[trade name]], model or [[type number]]: This information is necessary to compare the submitted item with the specified products and acceptable products listed, in the specification and [[addenda]].
*[[Manufacturer]], [[trade name]], model or type number: This information is necessary to compare the submitted item with the specified products and acceptable products listed, in the specification and [[addenda]].
*Description of use and performance characteristics: Information should be [[furnished]] describing the normal use and expected [[performance]] of the product. The architect and contractor reviews this information to confirm that the product is appropriate for the intended use.
*Description of use and performance characteristics: Information should be furnished describing the normal use and expected [[performance]] of the product. The architect and contractor reviews this information to confirm that the product is appropriate for the intended use.
*[[Size]] and [[physical characteristics]]: The size and physical characteristics, such as adjustment capabilities, which is reviewed by both the contractor and architect. The contractor has the most available information for comparing adjoining materials and equipment. The contractor also needs to know the size and weight of the equipment for lifting and handling considerations.
*[[Size]] and physical characteristics: The size and physical characteristics, such as adjustment capabilities, which is reviewed by both the contractor and architect. The contractor has the most available information for comparing adjoining materials and equipment. The contractor also needs to know the size and weight of the equipment for lifting and handling considerations.
*[[Finish characteristics]]: The architect reviews the available finishes and selects the appropriate finish, if the finish was not previously specified in the documents. The contractor should confirm that finish requirements in the specification are being met by the product.
*Finish characteristics: The architect reviews the available finishes and selects the appropriate finish, if the finish was not previously specified in the documents. The contractor should confirm that finish requirements in the specification are being met by the product.
*Specific request for [[jobsite dimensions]]: Some material is [[custom-fabricated]] to job conditions, requiring dimensions from the jobsite. These jobsite dimensions are provided by the contractor, prior to release of the product for manufacture.
*Specific request for jobsite dimensions: Some material is custom-fabricated to job conditions, requiring dimensions from the jobsite. These jobsite dimensions are provided by the contractor, prior to release of the product for manufacture.


===[[Shop Drawing]] ===
===Shop Drawing===


''See the article: [[Shop Drawing]].''
''See the article: [[Shop Drawing]].''


===Samples===
===Samples===
Many [[products]] require [[submission]] of [[samples]]. A sample is a [[physical portion]] of the [[specified product]]. Some samples are [[full product samples]], such as a [[brick]] or section of [[precast concrete]], or a [[partial sample]] that indicates color or [[texture]]. <ref> http://www.aafes.com/pz-s/construction/Ft%20Benning-Reception%20Ctr/SPECS.pdf</ref>The product sample is often required when several products are acceptable, to confirm the quality and [[aesthetic]] level of the material. The size or unit of sample material usually is specified. For some materials, a [[mock-up]] or sample panel is necessary. A common example of a sample panel is a [[brick panel]] in a large enough mock-up to demonstrate the full appearance of the material. The brick panel might be 4 feet wide by 6 feet high, showing all of the brick colors and materials, if there is a required variation in color and size. The sample panel also shows the mortar color and type of joint and, in this case, provides a completed version of the look of the wall that is not available from the brick sample alone.
Many [[products]] require [[submission]] of [[samples]]. A sample is a physical portion of the specified product. Some samples are full product samples, such as a [[brick]] or section of [[precast concrete]], or a partial sample that indicates color or [[texture]]. <ref> http://www.aafes.com/pz-s/construction/Ft%20Benning-Reception%20Ctr/SPECS.pdf</ref>The product sample is often required when several products are acceptable, to confirm the quality and [[aesthetic]] level of the material. The size or unit of sample material usually is specified. For some materials, a [[mock-up]] or sample panel is necessary. A common example of a sample panel is a brick panel in a large enough mock-up to demonstrate the full appearance of the material. The brick panel might be 4 feet wide by 6 feet high, showing all of the brick colors and materials, if there is a required variation in color and size. The sample panel also shows the mortar color and type of joint and, in this case, provides a completed version of the look of the wall that is not available from the brick sample alone.


Samples usually are required for finish selection or [[Approval rating|approval]]. Color and textures in the actual product can vary considerably from the color and textures shown in [[printed material]]. The printed [[brochure]] gives an indication of available colors, but the colors are [[rendered]] in [[printer’s ink]], rather than in the actual material. A quality level may be specified, requiring a selection of color and/or texture from [[sample pieces]] of the material. Several acceptable manufacturers may be listed in the specification and a level of quality also may be specified. The [[contractor]], [[subcontractor]], or [[supplier]] may have a preference for one of these products, based on [[price]], [[availability]], [[quality]], [[workability]], or [[service]].
Samples usually are required for finish selection or [[Approval rating|approval]]. Color and textures in the actual product can vary considerably from the color and textures shown in printed material. The printed [[brochure]] gives an indication of available colors, but the colors are [[rendered]] in printer’s ink, rather than in the actual material. A quality level may be specified, requiring a selection of color and/or texture from sample pieces of the material. Several acceptable manufacturers may be listed in the specification and a level of quality also may be specified. The [[contractor]], [[subcontractor]], or [[supplier]] may have a preference for one of these products, based on [[price]], [[availability]], [[quality]], workability, or [[service]].


Samples are usually stored at the [[jobsite]] and compared to the [[material delivered]] and [[installed]]. [[Comparison]] of samples with the product received is an important part of [[project quality control]].
Samples are usually stored at the jobsite and compared to the material delivered and installed. [[Comparison]] of samples with the product received is an important part of project quality control.


==Review of Submittals==
==Review of Submittals==


Definite processing time is required by most projects for approval of all submittals, shop drawings, and samples. The procedures can seem very [[cumbersome]] and [[time comsuming]], however, there are substantial reasons for review steps by all [[parties]]. The [[designer]] is ultimately responsible for the [[design]] of the [[facility]] to meet occupancy needs and must ensure that the products being installed are suitable to meet these needs. Any change in [[material]] or [[fabrication]] needs to be [[reviewed]] for its acceptability with the [[original design]]. Both the [[architect]] and [[contractor]] need to be able to [[coordinate]] the installation of the [[product]] with other [[systems]].
Definite processing time is required by most projects for approval of all submittals, shop drawings, and samples. The procedures can seem very cumbersome and time consuming, however, there are substantial reasons for review steps by all [[parties]]. The [[designer]] is ultimately responsible for the [[design]] of the [[facility]] to meet occupancy needs and must ensure that the products being installed are suitable to meet these needs. Any change in [[material]] or [[fabrication]] needs to be reviewed for its acceptability with the original design. Both the [[architect]] and [[contractor]] need to be able to [[coordinate]] the installation of the [[product]] with other [[systems]].


Each level must review, [[add information]] as necessary, and [[rubber stamp|stamp]] or [[seal (device)|seal]] that the submittal was examined and approved by that party. After the submittal reaches the [[primary reviewer]], it is returned through the same steps, which provides an opportunity for further comment and assures that each party is aware of the [[Approval rating|approval]], [[partial approval]], [[notes]], or [[rejection]]. Obviously this [[approval process]] is [[cumbersome]] and [[time-consuming]].
Each level must review, add information as necessary, and [[rubber stamp|stamp]] or [[seal (device)|seal]] that the submittal was examined and approved by that party. After the submittal reaches the primary reviewer, it is returned through the same steps, which provides an opportunity for further comment and assures that each party is aware of the [[Approval rating|approval]], [[partial approval]], [[notes]], or [[rejection]]. Obviously this approval process is cumbersome and time-consuming.


Typically, the [[architect]] will review the submittal for [[compliance]] to the [[requirements]] in the [[construction documents]]. [[Revisions]] may be noted on the submittal. Colors and other [[selection items]] will be made by the architect during this review. Sometimes the architect will reject the entire submittal and other times will request resubmittal of some of the items. The architect also will make corrections, which normally do not need to be resubmitted, but that do need to be applied to the product.
Typically, the [[architect]] will review the submittal for [[compliance]] to the [[requirements]] in the construction documents. [[Revisions]] may be noted on the submittal. Colors and other selection items will be made by the architect during this review. Sometimes the architect will reject the entire submittal and other times will request resubmittal of some of the items. The architect also will make corrections, which normally do not need to be resubmitted, but that do need to be applied to the product.
The contractor should manage the submittal process just like any other process in the [[construction cycle]]. Careful [[planning]] is necessary to ensure that the products are [[ordered]] and [[delivered]] within the [[construction schedule]], so as not to delay any activities. The contractor must [[prioritize]] the submittal process, submitting and obtaining approval for materials needed for the first part of the project.
The contractor should manage the submittal process just like any other process in the construction cycle. Careful [[planning]] is necessary to ensure that the products are ordered and delivered within the construction schedule, so as not to delay any activities. The contractor must prioritize the submittal process, submitting and obtaining approval for materials needed for the first part of the project.


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 21:49, 11 December 2007

Submittals in Construction Management are shop drawings, material data, and samples. Product data submittals, samples, and shop drawings are required primarily for the architect and engineer to verify that the correct products will be installed on the project.[1]

This process also gives the architect and sub-consultants the opportunity to select colors, patterns, and types of material that were not chosen prior to completion of the construction drawings. This is not an occasion for the architect to select different materials than specified, but rather to clarify the selection within the quality level indicated in the specification. For materials requiring fabrication, such as reinforcing steel and structural steel, the architect and engineer need to verify details furnished by the fabricator. The contractor also uses this information in installation, using dimensions and installation data from the submittal. The construction documents, specifically the technical specifications, require the contractor to submit product data, samples, and shop drawings to the architect and engineer for approval. This is one of the first steps that is taken by the contractor after execution of the construction contract and issuance of the "Notice to Proceed". The submittal process is very important, as it directly relates to the quality, schedule, and ultimately the overall success of the project. The submittal process can be complex, because there are literally thousands of different materials, fabrications, and equipment used in a construction project.

Types of Submittals

Product Data Submittal

The product data submittal usually consists of the manufacturer’s product information. The information included in this submittal are:

  • Manufacturer, trade name, model or type number: This information is necessary to compare the submitted item with the specified products and acceptable products listed, in the specification and addenda.
  • Description of use and performance characteristics: Information should be furnished describing the normal use and expected performance of the product. The architect and contractor reviews this information to confirm that the product is appropriate for the intended use.
  • Size and physical characteristics: The size and physical characteristics, such as adjustment capabilities, which is reviewed by both the contractor and architect. The contractor has the most available information for comparing adjoining materials and equipment. The contractor also needs to know the size and weight of the equipment for lifting and handling considerations.
  • Finish characteristics: The architect reviews the available finishes and selects the appropriate finish, if the finish was not previously specified in the documents. The contractor should confirm that finish requirements in the specification are being met by the product.
  • Specific request for jobsite dimensions: Some material is custom-fabricated to job conditions, requiring dimensions from the jobsite. These jobsite dimensions are provided by the contractor, prior to release of the product for manufacture.

Shop Drawing

See the article: Shop Drawing.

Samples

Many products require submission of samples. A sample is a physical portion of the specified product. Some samples are full product samples, such as a brick or section of precast concrete, or a partial sample that indicates color or texture. [2]The product sample is often required when several products are acceptable, to confirm the quality and aesthetic level of the material. The size or unit of sample material usually is specified. For some materials, a mock-up or sample panel is necessary. A common example of a sample panel is a brick panel in a large enough mock-up to demonstrate the full appearance of the material. The brick panel might be 4 feet wide by 6 feet high, showing all of the brick colors and materials, if there is a required variation in color and size. The sample panel also shows the mortar color and type of joint and, in this case, provides a completed version of the look of the wall that is not available from the brick sample alone.

Samples usually are required for finish selection or approval. Color and textures in the actual product can vary considerably from the color and textures shown in printed material. The printed brochure gives an indication of available colors, but the colors are rendered in printer’s ink, rather than in the actual material. A quality level may be specified, requiring a selection of color and/or texture from sample pieces of the material. Several acceptable manufacturers may be listed in the specification and a level of quality also may be specified. The contractor, subcontractor, or supplier may have a preference for one of these products, based on price, availability, quality, workability, or service.

Samples are usually stored at the jobsite and compared to the material delivered and installed. Comparison of samples with the product received is an important part of project quality control.

Review of Submittals

Definite processing time is required by most projects for approval of all submittals, shop drawings, and samples. The procedures can seem very cumbersome and time consuming, however, there are substantial reasons for review steps by all parties. The designer is ultimately responsible for the design of the facility to meet occupancy needs and must ensure that the products being installed are suitable to meet these needs. Any change in material or fabrication needs to be reviewed for its acceptability with the original design. Both the architect and contractor need to be able to coordinate the installation of the product with other systems.

Each level must review, add information as necessary, and stamp or seal that the submittal was examined and approved by that party. After the submittal reaches the primary reviewer, it is returned through the same steps, which provides an opportunity for further comment and assures that each party is aware of the approval, partial approval, notes, or rejection. Obviously this approval process is cumbersome and time-consuming.

Typically, the architect will review the submittal for compliance to the requirements in the construction documents. Revisions may be noted on the submittal. Colors and other selection items will be made by the architect during this review. Sometimes the architect will reject the entire submittal and other times will request resubmittal of some of the items. The architect also will make corrections, which normally do not need to be resubmitted, but that do need to be applied to the product.

The contractor should manage the submittal process just like any other process in the construction cycle. Careful planning is necessary to ensure that the products are ordered and delivered within the construction schedule, so as not to delay any activities. The contractor must prioritize the submittal process, submitting and obtaining approval for materials needed for the first part of the project.

Notes

  1. ^ "Research and Applications". Integrating Concurrent Engineering Concepts in a Steelwork Construction Project (PDF). Vol. 8. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc. 2000-05-05. pp. 199–210. Retrieved 2007-02-16. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help); Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |Authors= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |coauthor2= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |institute= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |university= ignored (help)
  2. ^ http://www.aafes.com/pz-s/construction/Ft%20Benning-Reception%20Ctr/SPECS.pdf

References

  • Pietroforte, Roberto. "Communication and governance in the building process" (pdf). Taylor & Francis Group. Retrieved 2007-02-18.
  • Anumba C.J. and N.F.O. Evbuomwan 1997, “Concurrent Engineering in Design-Build Projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 15(3):271–281.
  • Anumba C.J., Cutting-Decelle A.F., Baldwin A.N., Dufau J., Mommessin M., Bouchlaghem N.M., “Integration of Product and Process Models as a Keystone of Concurrent Engineering in Construction: The ProMICE Project,” Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, Amor R. (Ed.), 1998.
  • Dubois A.M., Flynn J., Verhorf M.H.G., Augenbroe, F., “Conceptual Modelling Approaches in the COMBINE Project,” Final Combine Workshop Paper, Dublin, 1995.