User:LuciferMorgan/Archive 19: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:03, 12 December 2007

This is an archive of past discussions with User:LuciferMorgan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

←

→

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

99 Ways to Die

Nominated. I was looking at this earlier today for some reason, and considered nominating it then, but got distracted. The discussion can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99 Ways to Die (song). J Milburn 13:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I've also nominated I Could Care Less, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Could Care Less. J Milburn 18:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Featured material subpage

Hi. I suggest that you put <includeonly> and </includeonly> tags around your User:LuciferMorgan/Featured material page. This will stop your name from appearing twice in categories that those boxes put you in. After adding them, your subpage will look empty, but the userboxes will still appear on your main userpage. Thanks for your time. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Not too sure how to do this - you're welcome to fix this if you wish, and I wouldn't mind. LuciferMorgan 21:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Outrageous personal attack

I ask you to withdraw this comment immediately per WP:NPA. Describing another editor as "the cancer of Wikipedia" is utterly unacceptable. WjBscribe 19:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I will do no such thing. It was an extremely accurate description, and many other Wikipedia users hold similar opinions. Editors who work on articles are rather fed up of being pestered by his useless bot, and the lame excuses he gives. The only thing I find "outrageous" is the fact you thought I would withdraw my statement - any opinions I hold, I stick to them. LuciferMorgan 22:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

DevilDriver

Hey i just found the interview you did with the DevilDriver guitarist, coming up in the world ;p

If you have the time could you give the DevilDriver article a run down? I started work on it because it was in really bad shape and had three cleanup tags. Also the fact their discography is small so less work ;p

Reading the introduction of your interview it appears you did some research on their background so i thought you might be able to help on what should be added/removed/changed etc. I'll also make sure to get The Blackening complete this week (feel free to remind me if i don't). Anyway if you are busy and don't have the time then no problem, cya around. M3tal H3ad 09:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Yea the main problem is trying to find info on why Pitts left, no one really talks about it and Pitts hasn't done an interview (as far as I'm aware). Anyway I'll keep looking, thanks. M3tal H3ad 01:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I can't find anything on that either. I read on your page that you're due to overhaul Cannibal Corpse sometime - the interview I did with Chris Barnes is quite good if you wish to get his side of the story on why he left. There's also a short bit on the band in "Choosing Death" by Albert Mudrian - give me a bell when you begin work, and I'll bring that book out for you. The book is good on how they got in "Ace Ventura - Pet Detective". LuciferMorgan 15:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, although i think i will just do some general cleanup/adding what i have, as reading CC interviews there is not enough to go on to get it GA. M3tal H3ad 04:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

This remark is totally unnaceptable. Your propensity for making such personal attacks is highly disruptive. I gave you the opportunity to withdraw the remark and you have refused, merely defending the comment. In light of your previous history of blocks for incivility, I have blocked you for 5 days from editing Wikipedia (ie. one week after I gave you the opportunity to withdraw the comment). WjBscribe 18:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Of course I refused. Why should I not refuse? Since you wish to block people for being highly disruptive, feel free to pay your friend Betacommand a visit. If anyone is the definition of supreme disruption here, it is him and his bot. I find it rather unfortunate, and pathetic, that you condone his bot's behaviour. It'll continue to eat at Wikipedia's core, and the disease will spread. "The cancer of Wikipedia" is still an accurate definition, and one I will always stand by. LuciferMorgan 18:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

And since I am blocked, perhaps you can add the fair use rationales to the images that will be deleted while I'm blocked? LuciferMorgan 18:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 |}
 <small>Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).</small>
+== 99 Ways to Die ==
+Nominated. I was looking at this earlier today for some reason, and considered nominating it then, but got distracted. The discussion can be seen at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/99 Ways to Die (song)]]. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 13:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
+:I've also nominated [[I Could Care Less]], see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Could Care Less]]. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
+== Featured material subpage ==
+Hi.  I suggest that you put <nowiki><includeonly> and </includeonly></nowiki> tags around your [[User:LuciferMorgan/Featured material]] page.  This will stop your name from appearing twice in categories that those boxes put you in.  After adding them, your subpage will look empty, but the userboxes will still appear on your main userpage.  Thanks for your time.  --[[User:Arctic.gnome|Arctic Gnome]] <small>([[User talk:Arctic.gnome|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arctic.gnome|contribs]])</small> 19:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
+:Not too sure how to do this - you're welcome to fix this if you wish, and I wouldn't mind. [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 21:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
+==Outrageous personal attack==
+I ask you to withdraw [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABetacommand&diff=167481655&oldid=167480939 this comment] immediately per [[WP:NPA]]. Describing another editor as "the cancer of Wikipedia" is utterly unacceptable. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 19:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
+:I will do no such thing. It was an extremely accurate description, and many other Wikipedia users hold similar opinions. Editors who work on articles are rather fed up of being pestered by his useless bot, and the lame excuses he gives. The only thing I find "outrageous" is the fact you thought I would withdraw my statement - any opinions I hold, I stick to them. [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 22:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
+==DevilDriver==
+Hey i just found the interview you did with the DevilDriver guitarist, coming up in the world ;p
+If you have the time could you give the [[DevilDriver]] article a run down? I started work on it because it was in ''really'' bad shape and had three cleanup tags. Also the fact their discography is small so less work ;p
+Reading the introduction of your interview it appears you did some research on their background so i thought you might be able to help on what should be added/removed/changed etc. I'll also make sure to get ''The Blackening'' complete this week (feel free to remind me if i don't). Anyway if you are busy and don't have the time then no problem, cya around. [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 09:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
+:Yea the main problem is trying to find info on why Pitts left, no one really talks about it and Pitts hasn't done an interview (as far as I'm aware). Anyway I'll keep looking, thanks. [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 01:35, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
+::I can't find anything on that either. I read on your page that you're due to overhaul Cannibal Corpse sometime - the interview I did with Chris Barnes is quite good if you wish to get his side of the story on why he left. There's also a short bit on the band in "Choosing Death" by Albert Mudrian - give me a bell when you begin work, and I'll bring that book out for you. The book is good on how they got in "Ace Ventura - Pet Detective". [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 15:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
+:::Ok, although i think i will just do some general cleanup/adding what i have, as reading CC interviews there is not enough to go on to get it GA. [[User:M3tal H3ad|M3tal H3ad]] 04:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
+==Blocked==
+[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Betacommand&diff=prev&oldid=167481655 This remark] is totally unnaceptable. Your propensity for making such [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] is highly disruptive. I gave you the opportunity to withdraw the remark and you have refused, merely defending the comment. In light of your previous history of blocks for incivility, I have blocked you for 5 days from editing Wikipedia (ie. one week after I gave you the opportunity to withdraw the comment). <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 18:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
+:Of course I refused. Why should I not refuse? Since you wish to block people for being highly disruptive, feel free to pay your friend Betacommand a visit. If anyone is the definition of supreme disruption here, it is him and his bot. I find it rather unfortunate, and pathetic, that you condone his bot's behaviour. It'll continue to eat at Wikipedia's core, and the disease will spread. "The cancer of Wikipedia" is still an accurate definition, and one I will always stand by. [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 18:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
+::And since I am blocked, perhaps you can add the fair use rationales to the images that will be deleted while I'm blocked? [[User:LuciferMorgan|LuciferMorgan]] 18:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
+{{unblock reviewed|1=I believe that the duration of the block is rather extreme. Also, in making the comment I got blocked for, I believe I had the right to my opinion considering the amount of disruptive messages I (and others) have received from Betacommandbot. Also, I feel the block serves no purpose. I've written 3 FAs, and contribute to WP:HMM - in blocking me, all this is doing is preventing me from contributing to that Project. After these five days are up, I will still believe my opinion is correct anyway, so what is the actual point of blocking me? In my opinion, all it is is censorship. If I am unblocked, all I will do is continue to contribute to the WP:HMM Project. I have my opinion on Betacommand's actions, and others have theirs. I wish to just leave it at that, and still have the right to my opinion. LuciferMorgan 20:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)|decline=You made some pretty horrible comments re. another editor yet remain recalcitrant about them. [[WP:NPA]] and all that. However, given your past history, I'm reducing the block to two days. But please, understand that attacks of that nature are unacceptable, regardless of your reasons here — [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family: comic sans ms">'''A<font color= "#FF7C0A">l<font color= "#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison|❤]]</sup> 21:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)}}