Jump to content

Talk:XQuartz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


:Possssssssssssssibly. OTOH, the next version of GTK+ will apparently be Quartz-native, meaning OOo and Gimp won't need X11. (The Quartz code is alpha-to-early-beta at present, meaning apps using it will sometimes actually start before crashing ;-) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 13:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
:Possssssssssssssibly. OTOH, the next version of GTK+ will apparently be Quartz-native, meaning OOo and Gimp won't need X11. (The Quartz code is alpha-to-early-beta at present, meaning apps using it will sometimes actually start before crashing ;-) - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] 13:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

::imo including a list like that is opening a can of worms.. there are lots of X apps.


== Categories ==
== Categories ==

Revision as of 16:14, 13 December 2007

WikiProject iconApple Inc. Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


It would be really great if this page would explain if X Windows system allows for a X application to show up on the Mac desktop just like any other "native" application. Or, is this a septate desktop? What I am getting at is, how does this work from the users perspective? Dfeig 18:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

where do you download x11 for mac os x 10.4.4? they say it's on the CD, but I don't have that cd anymore.. nowhere to download it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conchis (talkcontribs) 22:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


First, sign your posts, Conchis. Second, Wikipedia talk pages are not supposed to be help forums. Third, I will help you anyway, by leaving a message on your talk page. BDWill Talk Contribs 08:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Download it from here: http://cjmart.in/2006/12/01/install-x11-on-tiger-without-the-tiger-install-dvd/ --192.58.221.248 16:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

X11.app required

Certain applications require X11.app (or other X Window compatibility) to run on Mac OS X. Some examples include:

Are there other notable examples? Should a list like this be included in the article? 204.42.24.75 04:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possssssssssssssibly. OTOH, the next version of GTK+ will apparently be Quartz-native, meaning OOo and Gimp won't need X11. (The Quartz code is alpha-to-early-beta at present, meaning apps using it will sometimes actually start before crashing ;-) - David Gerard 13:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
imo including a list like that is opening a can of worms.. there are lots of X apps.

Categories

I took out Category:Compatibility layers - it isn't anything of the sort, it's just an X server with some funky hooks into MacOS X - David Gerard 13:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

X.org?

The general trend for other distros is to move away from XFree86 towards X.org, mostly because that is where all the active extension development is occurring. What are Apple's future plans for X11.app? --IanOsgood 03:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]