Jump to content

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 December 12: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fritz Saalfeld (talk | contribs)
m ++header
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude><div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 1px 0 0; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; font-size:10px">
{| width = "100%"
|-
! width="50%" align="left" | <span style="color:gray">&lt;</span> [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 December 11|December 11]]
! width="50%" align="right" | [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 December 13|December 13]] <span style="color:gray">></span>
|}</div></noinclude>
===December 12===
==== [[:Image:Gisele-bundchen.jpg]] ====
==== [[:Image:Gisele-bundchen.jpg]] ====
[[User:Number1spygirl|Number1spygirl]] ([[User talk:Number1spygirl|talk]]) 11:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
[[User:Number1spygirl|Number1spygirl]] ([[User talk:Number1spygirl|talk]]) 11:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:47, 18 December 2007

December 12

Number1spygirl (talk) 11:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio of http://www.espressoplanet.com/detail-equipment.asp?PRODUCT_ID=Equipment:Home+Use:Keurig+Platinum+B70, likely provided to sellers by Keurig Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GFDL not indicated from source site. Jusjih (talk) 02:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader removed PD-self while such a claim may not be convincing. Jusjih (talk) 03:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PD-self removed by IP. Unsure who is right. Jusjih (talk) 03:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The content says all rights reserved while the uploader removed license. Jusjih (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is from Image:Leonardo Rossi.pdf whose content says all rights reserved. Jusjih (talk) 03:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After PD-self is removed, the latest permission statement does not seem to be freely usable with GFDL. Jusjih (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure who the artist of the status is, but the image looks like a derivative work of the status. Jusjih (talk) 03:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged PD-US, which is clearly wrong. (This was for an old version of the photo, which was of Thomas Jefferson. This is a contemporary photo.) – Quadell (talk) (random) 04:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a promo photo probably not taken by uploader. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]