Jump to content

Talk:Nottingham Urban Area: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PaievBot (talk | contribs)
Bot adding WikiProject UKGEO template
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPUKgeo|importance=|class=}}
== Map Request ==
== Map Request ==
{{reqmapin|England}}
{{reqmapin|England}}

Revision as of 00:43, 21 December 2007

WikiProject iconUK geography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Map Request

I think it would be useful to have a map showing just how much larger the 'Greater Nottingham' area is than the 'City'. It might clarify things elsewhere with regard to what is and isn't Nottingham. Bevo74 12:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

title

This is a rather tendentious title (especially if one was born in Derby :-)) - isn't it just the ONS 'Travel to work ' area'? The Bristol 'Travel to Work' area, of similar size, was used as a justification for the County of Avon - quite a good one, operationally, but alas not politically! (The result is, in both cases, the city unitary authorities are based on 'old boundaries' and so rather undersized, even to service their core population )Linuxlad 17:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

There is a move to merge Greater Bristol and Bristol - I would have thought that Nottingham and Bristol should be dealt with similary since they're broadly similar-sized cities and hinterlands. Bob aka Linuxlad 16:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]