User talk:Swpb: Difference between revisions
Nastykermit (talk | contribs) |
→fmt?: new section |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Sorry about that. I was not aware of the prosedure. I swear I was not comitting vandalism. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Nastykermit|Nastykermit]] ([[User talk:Nastykermit|talk]]) |
Sorry about that. I was not aware of the prosedure. I swear I was not comitting vandalism. Thanks for letting me know. [[User:Nastykermit|Nastykermit]] ([[User talk:Nastykermit|talk]]) |
||
== fmt? == |
|||
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Mustang&diff=126209177&oldid=123479896 this edit], what does "fmt" mean? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/71.127.0.31|71.127.0.31]] ([[User talk:71.127.0.31|talk]]) 16:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:43, 24 December 2007
dab notices
see reply at User talk:BrownHairedGirl#dab_notices. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)
Pepper
Hi !
I agree with your comment on the pepper-disambiguation.
The problem I ran into when trying to fix it is that it appears to me as if *most* of the pages linking to "pepper" really mean pepper as in the group of spices. Which means that:
Linking to black_pepper is wrong. Linking to the disambiguation is however also not correct, it is clear they mean "pepper (spice)" and not for example, "pepper (music)". I wrote about it on the talk-page for pepper.
What do you think about my idea: Write a new page "pepper (spice)" which talks about the group of spices commonly refered to as pepper (or peppers), and include links to the various types of peppers, such as black_pepper and chili_pepper.
Good ? Bad ? Wanna help ?
Weightlessness
Excuse me,but i didnt edit that page.You might be mistaken with someone else. 82.20.49.200 November the 13th 2007 5:19 (UTC)
Trønder
Sorry about that. I was not aware of the prosedure. I swear I was not comitting vandalism. Thanks for letting me know. Nastykermit (talk)
fmt?
Regarding this edit, what does "fmt" mean? Thanks. 71.127.0.31 (talk) 16:43, 24 December 2007 (UTC)