Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Heuschrecke 10/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:30, 24 December 2007

Heuschrecke 10

Prior nomination here.

I believe that this is ready for an A-Class marking. I have changed it since my last comment at 13 December 2007. I have added a reference, and have completed it I believe. Dreamafter ^Talk 19:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:
- Why is "Geschützwagen IV" in parenthasis in the opening paragraph? There doesn't seem to be a reason for it, although I do not know that for a fact. Done
- Can you provide a standard measurement for you metrically challenged audience? I know that 155 mm is roughly six inches, but I do not know what 105 mm equates to in inches. Done
- Would it be at all possible to put the armour information in the infobox? I grant you that would be a lot of work, but it has been done on our battleship artilces. Doing...
- It seems suprisingly short, although I will not object on the basis of length I do feel that there could be some unmentioned information. For example, where was the vehical to be produced (town would be good, factory would be better), how much would it have costed (projected cost would be ok), was it cancelled in favored of another vehical or some other reason, etc. Doing...
Otherwise, it looks ok. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 I believe that this is ready for an A-Class marking. I have changed it since my last comment at <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Peer_review/Heuschrecke_10&oldid=177593183 13 December 2007]</span>. I have added a reference, and have completed it I believe. [[User:Dreamafter|<font color="crimson">Dreamafter</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Dreamafter|<font color="purple">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 *Comments:
-**Why is "Geschützwagen IV" in parenthasis in the opening paragraph? There doesn't seem to be a reason for it, although I do not know that for a fact.
+**Why is "Geschützwagen IV" in parenthasis in the opening paragraph? There doesn't seem to be a reason for it, although I do not know that for a fact. {{done}}
-**Can you provide a standard measurement for you metrically challenged audience? I know that 155 mm is roughly six inches, but I do not know what 105 mm equates to in inches.
+**Can you provide a standard measurement for you metrically challenged audience? I know that 155 mm is roughly six inches, but I do not know what 105 mm equates to in inches. {{done}}
-**Would it be at all possible to put the armour information in the infobox? I grant you that would be a lot of work, but it has been done on our battleship artilces.
+**Would it be at all possible to put the armour information in the infobox? I grant you that would be a lot of work, but it has been done on our battleship artilces. {{doing}}
-**It seems suprisingly short, although I will not object on the basis of length I do feel that there could be some unmentioned information. For example, where was the vehical to be produced (town would be good, factory would be better), how much would it have costed (projected cost would be ok), was it cancelled in favored of another vehical or some other reason, etc.
+**It seems suprisingly short, although I will not object on the basis of length I do feel that there could be some unmentioned information. For example, where was the vehical to be produced (town would be good, factory would be better), how much would it have costed (projected cost would be ok), was it cancelled in favored of another vehical or some other reason, etc. {{doing}}
 *Otherwise, it looks ok. [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 21:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)