Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:56, 29 December 2007

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Administrators

Hey Tabercil, just an interesting quote i thought you might like from jimbo wales;

"I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.

I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone.

I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing."

CClaudia new official homepage

this is the real new official CClaudia web-site : CClaudia.net the former one - CClaudia.com was made by a Spansh Model Agency (SpainModels) and was no more updated since 8 months because this Agency was given up by the owner Victor Martinez from Madrid. - So pls. allow to post the new real homepage of Ms. Ciesla. - This is not linkspam. --TommyNoe 14:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Tommy Noe[reply]

Is there somewhere other than those two pages that back up what you say, that .net is the current official page and not .com? Tabercil 23:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- please see imprint, webmaster of CClaudia.com: http://www.natalisweb.com/ Director Victor Martinez Diaz. Madrid. He was the former CEO of Spainmodels, Madrid. This Agency was given up by Mr. Martinez.
  Pls see also imprint of: http://www.cclaudia.net/english/impressum.php.
  there are existing 3 or 4 more websites about CClaudia or CClaudia-Model or Claudia Ciesla, but all these are made by several Fan-Groups of Ms. Ciesla and not her official sites.--Kadenpress 12:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Umm. Maybe I misspoke... is there an article or interview online that clearly shows that .net is the current homepage? Tabercil 13:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - the new webpage (.net) looks like an advertising for the "new CClaudia Calendar 2008" Wiki-nightmare 13:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        That's not unexpected if the link is indeed her official site... you would expect the celebrity to be flogging things like their own calendars on their official site. What I'm more interested in resolving is which site is her official site: .com or .net - both seem to lay claim to that status. Tabercil 13:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        I see your point. You're right. Domain whois says: .com .net Owner Contact: Claudia Ciesla for .net Wiki-nightmare 13:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        The Website CClaudia.com was not updated since about 1 year. Following mail was received by Mr. Martinez (former COE of SpainModels) from Madrid saying: "Siento si te ha molestado todo este tema de tu website CClaudia.com, pero ya no puedo ocuparme de tu website. Me hubiera gustado seguir adelante pero tengo mucho trabajo y ya no puedo. El dominio www.cclaudia.com finaliza en diciembre. Siento mucho el tema de la website y quiero que sepas que siempre te he querido ayudar en todo lo posible y que tienes un amigo en Madrid para lo que necesites." Means, that Mr. Martinez appologizes not beeing able to work on this website because of lots of other work and website will be given up. - Original mail can be received by Mr. Tommy Noe, Admin (and Moderator of her Yahoo Fan Base and US MySpace Group) for Ms. Ciesla in USA. --Kadenpress 13:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Hmm... looks like .net is the current "official" site. Tabercil 17:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears' contact information

Hello Tabercil,

No need to get hot under the collar so quickly. If you would have noticed, I posted on Britney's talk page a request for opinion soon after I published the link.

Additionally, I'm one of the initiators of "nofollow" links to reduce spam and inappropriate conducts.

A little respect to my straightforward practices will do.

Midas touch 06:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You added the link to the main page, then added the comment to the Talk page afterwards. When I go through my Watchlist, I always go in chronological order i.e., check the oldest edit first, then the next oldest. As well, your posting of the comment to the Talk page happened after my removal of the link, judging by the revision histories. As for the link itself, I'll put my thoughts on it on the Talk page. Tabercil 12:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb

since when is IMDb.com user-edited? I think they started - probably inspired by Wikipedia - something like that where ordinary users can review movies (but with an obligatory registration and even some sort of further authentication).
I don't intend to go on further on this nor rechange your edit - I just stopped by because I'm curios. HTurtle 00:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the section at Wikiproject Pornography regarding the real names of performers, you'll see the logic behind why IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source for a name. And as a side note: I know that Jimbo holds similar views regarding IMDB. Tabercil 01:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a bit late, but thank you very much for this helpful and comprehensive answer! HTurtle 14:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Wagner jpg for her page

Tabercil,

I've followed what seems t be common practice in other actor pages by susing a low resolution photo captured from TV to use for Jill Wagner's page. Is there a way to do this without copyright infringement or do I have to get jill's permission. Thanks. MBCF 02:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture in question:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Jillwagneractress.jpg which will be deleted Nov 19.

I'm afraid we can't use copyrighted images to show what living people look like, per WP:NFCC#1. The ideal outcome in this situation is to obtain a photo under free license; I've written a tutorial on doing this at User:Videmus Omnia/Requesting free content. Good luck! Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Videmus, I'll try out one of your suggestions. I had already tried contacting Jill or her publicist through her myspace page but obviously not the best path. MBCF 16:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Regarding our recent Simpson-chat, you have mail. The Rambling Man 08:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doily dyke

That's not a reference I recommend holding onto dearly. I'll leave it for others to decide but recommend a more reliable source backs it up. I've not heard of dolly dyke or doily dyke but they certainly could have currency and both could be true. I suggest finding sources for whichever ones are true. As a bonus a good source can be used in any article. Benjiboi 07:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was the best reference I could find quickly through Google... hopefully it'll last long enough for a better one to be located. I also found a few hits on some urban dictionaries for the term, but I felt they were of even lower quality than the one I used. Tabercil (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, try this and this. Benjiboi 22:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came across that first link but didn't use it as it only used the term in such a fashion as not to be glean its meaning. As for the second, I think that one would be useful in the lipstick lesbian article as a secondary link to back up the first one.. .which is how I'm going to add it as. :) Tabercil (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Baby

For you this link http://www.pornstarsspain.com/soniababy/ is more imoprtant than this? Noproblem. delete this http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:200.3.222.13&redirect=no Write in Source Sonia Baby. You delete the link? You choice what can read the people in all wikipedia? You are the owner of wikipedia? I only make colaboration, you disturb. For me delete all the article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.3.222.13 (talk) 01:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mika Tan

Surprised when looking at this edit that you removed her birth name as being unsourced when the link to her IMDB bio followed immediately after. My understanding is that IMDB bios are a reputable source. Thanks for any clarification you can provide - Chewyrunt (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the section at Wikiproject Pornography regarding the real names of performers, you'll see the logic behind why IMDB is not considered to be a reliable source for a name. And as a side note: I know that Jimbo holds similar views regarding IMDB. Tabercil (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Aha, you are correct! Good to know - Chewyrunt (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peaches (porn star)

i was just reverting back links that were and have been there for awile.....i did not add any i just put them back. i did go thru the links and double check them, i have since deleted some and a few were duplicates. just like other living people pages they do have links ffor them, and this is what i have left. i have not done any wrong now. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford1206 (talk • contribs) 10:25, November 21, 2007

spammer

Yeah, it's a one-shot spammer. I'm collecting evidences first on my user page. When he resists, I'll report it and asks for blacklist if necessary. Thanks for the message. Dekisugi (talk) 00:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check it

Check on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Brandy_Ledford.jpg, follow the source and see with your own eyes! Then, tell me if it can't be upload to wikipedia. You can see the same on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Mercedez Sdrtirs (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WWF

Yeah, that was a mistake. I was doing some cleanup with AWB and made about 6 or so changes before I realized the mistake. It doesn't affect the link itself, so I didn't feel an urgency to fix it right away. TJ Spyke 00:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 50	10 December 2007	About the Signpost

Wikipedia dragged into German politics over Nazi images	Wales comments on citing Wikipedia produce BBC correction
WikiWorld comic: "Kilroy was here"	News and notes: Elections, Wikimania 2009, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Greater Manchester
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winnie Leuszler and "used with permission"

Note that a claim of "used with permission" from another website needs to be backed up by a letter from an email address assoicated with the website - see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for details.

Getting this done before someone lists the page on the "copyright violations" page is a Good Idea.

Good luck! --Alvestrand (talk) 07:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should have the email with the permission somewhere... just need to dig it up and forward it along to OTRS. Thanks for pointing that out! Tabercil (talk) 12:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Jeanna Fine pictures. . .

I think my two pictures with the awards are "better" because the they are sharp, clear scans from my original photos. The photo from "dirtybob" is off poor quality -- fuzzy and hard to look at.

I'm not trying to make trouble or keep redoing my pics -- I just appreciate pictures that are professional looking and clear to display. If he had a better picture to start, I would not have bothered to upload mine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbane700 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's your call, but my feelings largely echo that of AnonEMouse on this topic... Tabercil (talk) 22:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you take a look?

An image used in the article on the first Bangladeshi pornstar Jazmin, Image:WorshipThisBitch3.jpg, the cover of the DVD that made her the selling point, a first for a Bangladeshi, is up for deletion here. You may be interested to take a look. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 21:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 51	17 December 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: ArbCom elections, holiday publication
Former Wikimedia employee's criminal history detailed	Möller resigns from board, joins foundation as employee
Google announces foray into user-generated knowledge	WikiWorld comic: "Tractor beam"
News and notes: Elections, Wikimania 2009, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: Plants	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JR Rotem

	Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Your pic for JR Rotem is not right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.172.12.36 (talk) 19:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's how the photo was identified on lukeford.net. On digging further (by checking with other sources), I agree with you in that he was misidentified; the photo is actually of Edgar Ramirez. Tabercil (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 52	26 December 2007	About the Signpost

Wales appoints six arbitrators	Board approves expansion, up to 11 trustees possible
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses"	News and notes: Stewards, Senate testimony, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	WikiProject Report: Plants
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7