Jump to content

User talk:Spankman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spankman (talk | contribs)
BJBot (talk | contribs)
BJBot, deletion notification.
 
Line 12: Line 12:


:Ok! Delphi was a new language, no need to link to all imitators. [[User:Spankman|Spankman]] 06:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
:Ok! Delphi was a new language, no need to link to all imitators. [[User:Spankman|Spankman]] 06:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
==[[:Single-page application]]==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
Another editor has added the "{{tl|prod}}" template to the article [[Single-page application]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]] and [[Wikipedia:Notability]]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Single-page application|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{tl|prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> [[User:BJBot|BJBot]] ([[User talk:BJBot|talk]]) 04:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:29, 4 January 2008

First day

[edit]

Hello the world!!!

I have started discussion here. Please contribute, I appreciate your input. Jeff schiller 21:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chrome

[edit]

Well, like I said, Delphi is also a commercial compiler and an article by the name Delphi_programming_language, the the latter I don't find any more appealing than the Chrome one; however, no one has deleted the Delphi language article, nor accused it of being spam. Since I can see no difference between the two products (except that Delphi is much more famous, but it wouldn't be fair to treat them differently for that) I am simply suggesting that more people can help to reach the right decision. AfD should be fine for that, so by all means do it. Oh, and I wrote RfD instead of AfD by mistake. :\ Sorry for the confusion! --Arny 02:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Delphi was a new language, no need to link to all imitators. Spankman 06:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Single-page application, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]