Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J0HNNY: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m fix |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|J0HNNY}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J0HNNY|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 January 6#{{anchorencode:J0HNNY}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|J0HNNY}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J0HNNY|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 January 6#{{anchorencode:J0HNNY}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Speedy deleted twice but the creator has explicitly asked for an AFD. This does not meet the [[WP:N|general notability]] requirements or those of [[WP:MUSIC]]. It is written like a piece of [[WP:SPAM|spam]] as well. I see no harm in an afd and opening this upto other opinions without being [[WP:BITE|bitey]]. Thanks [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 21:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
Speedy deleted twice but the creator has explicitly asked for an AFD. This does not meet the [[WP:N|general notability]] requirements or those of [[WP:MUSIC]]. It is written like a piece of [[WP:SPAM|spam]] as well. I see no harm in an afd and opening this upto other opinions without being [[WP:BITE|bitey]]. Thanks [[User:Woody|Woody]] ([[User talk:Woody|talk]]) 21:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
<br> |
|||
Agree, this is little informative and written like a fifth grader. It is not encyclopedic for the most part. I vote for delete <font style="color:Blue;">'''[[User:Compwhizii|Comp]]'''whiz '''[[User_Talk:Compwhizii|II]]'''</font> 21:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:24, 6 January 2008
Speedy deleted twice but the creator has explicitly asked for an AFD. This does not meet the general notability requirements or those of WP:MUSIC. It is written like a piece of spam as well. I see no harm in an afd and opening this upto other opinions without being bitey. Thanks Woody (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Agree, this is little informative and written like a fifth grader. It is not encyclopedic for the most part. I vote for delete Compwhiz II 21:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)