Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 January 2: Difference between revisions
Flibirigit (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Keep''' - image is fair use and characters are important to plot [[User:Million Moments|Million_Moments]] ([[User talk:Million Moments|talk]]) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - image is fair use and characters are important to plot [[User:Million Moments|Million_Moments]] ([[User talk:Million Moments|talk]]) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - appearance of the Host is relevant to certain complaints levied against this article by people who resent their appearance as angels. --[[User:Infophile|Infophile]] <sup>[[User_talk:Infophile|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Infophile|(Contribs)]]</sup> 20:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - appearance of the Host is relevant to certain complaints levied against this article by people who resent their appearance as angels. --[[User:Infophile|Infophile]] <sup>[[User_talk:Infophile|(Talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Infophile|(Contribs)]]</sup> 20:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'' - Image is relevant, and useful for the plot. [[User: StuartDD|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Stuart</span>]][[User talk: StuartDD|<span style="background:red;color:white">DD</span>]] <sub>[[Special:Contributions/StuartDD|contributions]]</sub> 11:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Image:TechnoMotion arcade machine (perspective view).jpg]]==== |
====[[:Image:TechnoMotion arcade machine (perspective view).jpg]]==== |
Revision as of 11:46, 8 January 2008
January 2
- Garbled fair use raionale "As a screenshot of a major point of the plot of the specific episode. The screenshot also shows Banakaffalatta and the Heavenly Hosts, two non-human lifeforms which cannot be adequately described.", use "as a screenshot" is an invalid FU criteria, neither of the two lifeforms appearence has significant relevance to the plot, and their appearence is unmentioned in the article, these non humans even if mentioned could not be clearly identified from this image Fasach Nua (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Both Banakaffalatta and the Host are a crucial element of the plot. Also, "as a screenshot" is an invalid FU criteria is a very empty argument in itself. — Edokter • Talk • 16:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - nomination flawed - the Host stalking the party is pretty much the entire premise of the episode. Will (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also, "Bannakaffallatta" is mentioned three times and the Host ten times in the plot summary alone. I don't know if you actually read the article, to be honest. Will (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thankyou for those statistics, I was wondering if you could tell us how many times the appearence of the characters are referred in the article. The images claimed function is to show how these characters appear, while the hosts are essential to the plot, their appearence is largely irrelvant Fasach Nua (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I thought you meant appearance as in "appears in the special", not "what it looks like". Even so, both appearances are mentioned in the article, and the "appearance of the characters" was intended to be additional, not the main reason. Will (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is an absolute joke, so taking your last comment together with the rationale you wrote, the primary reason of this image is to be a screenshot? The critical commentry this FU image is used to aid is that this programme was broadcast for use on screen, what you are doing is getting very close to vandalism Fasach Nua (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- I thought you meant appearance as in "appears in the special", not "what it looks like". Even so, both appearances are mentioned in the article, and the "appearance of the characters" was intended to be additional, not the main reason. Will (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thankyou for those statistics, I was wondering if you could tell us how many times the appearence of the characters are referred in the article. The images claimed function is to show how these characters appear, while the hosts are essential to the plot, their appearence is largely irrelvant Fasach Nua (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also, "Bannakaffallatta" is mentioned three times and the Host ten times in the plot summary alone. I don't know if you actually read the article, to be honest. Will (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - image is fair use and characters are important to plot Million_Moments (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - appearance of the Host is relevant to certain complaints levied against this article by people who resent their appearance as angels. --Infophile (Talk) (Contribs) 20:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'Keep - Image is relevant, and useful for the plot. StuartDD contributions 11:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- This can't be public domain. Also, if we were to tag it as fair-use, it would be SUBST:RFU'd (catch my drift?) ViperSnake151 00:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Jerrylandry (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dennis L. Siluk (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Originalworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- BugBoyAndy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- BugBoyAndy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Darren Gilbert (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Diane Reyes (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Legithrand (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, LQ, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mantra-music (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE, OR. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 03:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Diagram is just plain wrong User A1 (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted per CSD G11 spam --Rifleman 82 (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- DMA (Direct Media Advertising) (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Obvious advertising, user has been blocked per SPAM and SOAP DodgerOfZion (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Portrays a real person, and calls her a 'typical tomboy'. Subjective and not worth having per WP:BLP. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotion that adds little to the article. Additionally, image is overall rather low-quality, and the blurred out faces are very distracting. --Icarus (Hi!) 11:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete this does not represent a good encyclopedic picture of a tomboy. -Nard 17:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Polarbear97 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Although the PD donation is appreciated, this image is of far too low quality to be of any use. It's very blurry and in very low resolution; it does virtually nothing to illustrate the article on Angela Kinsey, because all we can tell is that she's a vaguely blonde woman. Dylan (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, while the image is of low quality, it is the only one of Angela Kinsey available. Unless another one of Angela Kinsey is uploaded, I believe the image should stay. Polarbear97 (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Bad quality, and couldn't we always use the one from the character page?-Mastrchf91- 22:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- No. It is a replaceable non-free image. -- RG2 06:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- keep per polar, its a bad photo, not a terrible one, and it does (just about) fulfill its function. The image from the article is FU, and as such cannot be used in a biographical article to show what a person looks like Fasach Nua (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ladysoseono (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Psmcamille (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Charlieboi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is
notorphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC) - This image has been proposed for deletion because it is technically flawed. As discussed on the talk page, the ray paths shown are not correct. I have orphaned the image.--Srleffler (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mantra-music (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Osumailguy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Version-3-point-1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Polarbear97 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ladysoseono (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Psmcamille (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Charlieboi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Darren Gilbert (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted per CSD I5 unused non-free image; furthermore, it is easily replaceable with a free alternative. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mafia Expert (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. There we go again. As explained in two previous discussions (see here and here), the images Image:Lo Piccolo arrest.jpg and Image:Lo Piccolo photofit.jpg are discussed in the text. In the case of Image:Lo Piccolo arrest.jpg the image was made available by the Italian State police and subsequently distributed by several news agencies (see [1]). Potential copyright holders do not financially depend on the copyright. As per WP:NFC: photos from a press agencies are not permitted unless the photo itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article. In the section Arrest there is the following paragraph: "Officers remarked that Lo Piccolo’s face was entirely different from the identikit photo of him (see images on this page).[18] Lo Piccolo did not say word and just smiled when prosecutors noted that he did not ressemble the photofit released earlier this year.[19] The elder Lo Piccolo was in fact betrayed by his son of whome police did have a recent photograph.[20]" I think the discussion is closed by now and I will remove the tags. Otherwise we redo this debate every other week. - Mafia Expert (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mafia Expert (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong keep See above. - Mafia Expert (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - i can't tell why this has been listed for deletion? Its got a good licence and is in use? Fosnez (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mantra-music (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Slim Khezri (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Osumailguy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Version-3-point-1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suffolkalarms (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dennis L. Siluk (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Polarbear97 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep image is crappy but used and freely licensed. -Nard 12:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is orphaned. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Copyright violation (derivative work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not for copyright reasons but because I discarded it in favour of Image:OC_Horse&JockeyHurling2.038.jpg (below). (Sarah777 (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC))
- Also derived Image:OC_037Horse&JockeyBanner.jpg Fasach Nua (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep derived Image:OC_037Horse&JockeyBanner.jpg; it is from a public monument on a public road; photo of a 3D monument. (Sarah777 (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC))
- delete derived Image:OC_037Horse&JockeyBanner.jpg, I think this is really pushing the definition of a panorama beyond what is reasonable, why not just crop the GAA logo, and start producing branded merchandice? Fasach Nua (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now now Mr Fasach; as I've already indicated my support for deletion up here why the need for an argument stretching a point past breaking? Sarah777 (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry Sarah, it's a little disjointed, it was the derived banner, I was referring to Fasach Nua (talk) 07:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now now Mr Fasach; as I've already indicated my support for deletion up here why the need for an argument stretching a point past breaking? Sarah777 (talk) 07:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Copyright violation (derivative work) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Does this count as a copy of a 2D image, or a picture of a 3D monument? If the latter, I think it is okay Fasach Nua (talk) 16:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of panorama applies. -Nard 17:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a public monument on a public road; it is a photo of a 3D street monument; (I took it myself). The information on it is 100 years old and not protected in any way. (Sarah777 (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC))
- Keep, Ireland has a very generous FoP. See Commons:Commons:Freedom of Panorama for all the detail you could ever want on the subject. – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- But according to the commons page, UK law (on which Ireland is based and which it advises we should use as a baseline) signs do not qualify for FOP.[2] Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whoa! Irish and UK law have been diverging for the past 90 years! (Sarah777 (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC))
- Two-dimensional objects do not, this is true. Commons however has been lenient towards monuments for example with engraved signs with some amount of 2D in them. The section you indicate shows that hand-painted tiles and stained glass are covered under FOP, for instance. This hurling monument should get no less consideration. -Nard 15:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I dont really have an opinion on this, but WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid argument Fasach Nua (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Two-dimensional objects do not, this is true. Commons however has been lenient towards monuments for example with engraved signs with some amount of 2D in them. The section you indicate shows that hand-painted tiles and stained glass are covered under FOP, for instance. This hurling monument should get no less consideration. -Nard 15:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- No opinion? Hmmmm. Maybe in future I'll take my pictures of monuments to Irish Heroes from slightly to the side. Weren't you the chap tried to put Union Jacks beside Irish Players from the Occupied Territories? (Sarah777 (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC))
- I think you might want to look into those edits a bit more closely, I think you might have missed the wp:point of them. I dont really see what the connection is, however you are right, if you had of taken this picture from a further 1/2 metre back, this would be an unambiguious case of freedom of panorama, and a 100% keep. Fasach Nua (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Seraph_6th (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (used only in speedy-deleted page) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ryannairn22 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- A fair use image to illustrate the character is already being used, making this image obselete and no longer fair use Million_Moments (talk) 16:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - As this picture actually has her in the Atlantis uniform, and is of a better quality, this should be used instead of the other one. Fosnez (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment That uniform is actually out of date now, so I don't think keeping it because of the uniform is justified. Million_Moments (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- StargateX1 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- John Sheppard (Stargate) already has an image being used under terms of fair use to illustrate how the character looks, making this image obselete Million_Moments (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep - As this picture actually has him in the Atlantis uniform, and is of a better quality, this should be used instead of the other one. Fosnez (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Stillnotelf (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- No proof of permission, and permission is just to "use" image, not publish under GFDL. -Nard 17:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I still have an email from two years ago, the last time this came up. To whom do I present the necessary permission? The image on the school's website has since changed so it no longer matches what is elsewhere on the internet. -- stillnotelf is invisible 02:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rajeshnaroth (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- looks like a copyrighted screenshot Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per CSD I1 - redundant/duplicate image. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- orphan image. any chemists know what this reaction is? Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- It depicts the oxidation of an alkene with osmium tetroxide. The image appears to be redundant with Image:Oso4mechanism.gif which is used in osmium tetroxide. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- East_99_187killum (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Image is a screen capture from commercial DVD release by copyright holder Zuffa, LLC. Image is now orphaned as no articles link to it. Fair use claim is questionable, but image is unnecessary either way as text of articles for Matt Hughes (fighter) and Royce Gracie adequately present the information. Gromlakh (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- derivative work of copyrighted image Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's freedom of panorama which Singapore has. I've moved the image to Commons. -Nard 00:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dkarrenberg (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily-deleted unused, unencyclopedic. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- derivative work of copyrighted text Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Scorpion_prinz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- was on a page that got deleted. Delete as well. Agathoclea (talk) 13:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- nonfree album cover, i don't know to which QR album. also way too big to be kept if it's nonfree Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rowanmilesashe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rowanmilesashe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rowanmilesashe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rowanmilesashe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Flibirigit (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- WP:NFCC#8 violation. Used in a gallery of old logos. The logo is not discussed in the article and is not needed to understand the subject of the article Rettetast (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Technically, no logo is required to "understand the subject of the article". The logo serves as visual identification of the Moncton Golden Flames, an aspect of the franchise in the article. The logo isn't in an infobox because, per the nature of minor league sports, there have been numerous iterations of the same franchise as affiliations change. Ideally, the logos should be in the body of a history section documenting when and why the franchise shifted names and logos rather than a gallery, but that is a correctable issue with the content of the article, not with the validity of the Fair Use claim of the logo itself. Resolute 22:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Resolute, definately part of understanding the subject. -Djsasso (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Resolute. Article does need to be expanded. All the incarnations were lumped together per consensus for article merger. Unfortunately nobody has had the time to write more historical text, yet. Flibirigit (talk) 00:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per all above. DMighton (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep useful to illustrate article Million_Moments (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. If, as Resolute says, the image is used as "visual identification of the Moncton Golden Flames", then it fails WP:NFCC#3. If not, then it fails WP:NFCC#8 in that the logo isn't mentioned in the article. (This goes for the logo below as well.) – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- How does it fail NFCC#3? One logo does not suffice, as each logo represents a different aspect of the franchise. Each logo, representing each incarnation of the franchise is equally as important as any other logo used as a visual identification of any other subject on Wikipedia. Resolute 05:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- One logo would adequately represent the organization. – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- How does it fail NFCC#3? One logo does not suffice, as each logo represents a different aspect of the franchise. Each logo, representing each incarnation of the franchise is equally as important as any other logo used as a visual identification of any other subject on Wikipedia. Resolute 05:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - copyright violation FU #1, #8 Fasach Nua (talk) 13:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- UPDATE:Logo is now used in an infobox only at Moncton_Golden_Flames. Flibirigit (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Flibirigit (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- WP:NFCC#8 violation. Used in a gallery of old logos. The logo is not discussed in the article and is not needed to understand the subject of the article Rettetast (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Technically, no logo is required to "understand the subject of the article". The logo serves as visual identification of the New Brunswick Hawks, an aspect of the franchise in the article. The logo isn't in an infobox because, per the nature of minor league sports, there have been numerous iterations of the same franchise as affiliations change. Ideally, the logos should be in the body of a history section documenting when and why the franchise shifted names and logos rather than a gallery, but that is a correctable issue with the content of the article, not with the validity of the Fair Use claim of the logo itself. Resolute 22:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Resolute, definately part of understanding the subject. -Djsasso (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Resolute. Article does need to be expanded. All the incarnations were lumped together per consensus for article merger. Unfortunately nobody has had the time to write more historical text, yet. Flibirigit (talk) 00:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per all above. DMighton (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep useful to illustrate article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Million Moments (talk • contribs) 16:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- speedy delete - blatant violation of #8 and #1 Fasach Nua (talk) 13:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- UPDATE:Logo is now used in an infobox only at New Brunswick Hawks. Flibirigit (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)