Talk:Celestial (comics)

Agenda

Since the Celestials conduct there experiments on behalf of the Abstracts, does that make the Watchers the enemies of the Abstracts? For some reason I dont imagine the Abstracts having enemies.

Wasn't there a Celestial inside the Earth in Earth X? Was he realted to vibranium?

• There was a Celestial embryo inside the Earth, and vibranium made up the placenta. --InShaneee 04:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I remember a Celestial being inside Earth X. And I remember they traveled to alternate Earths to warn them of Celestials inside of them. But does that mean there's a Celestial inside Earth 616? --AlGorup 14:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

There was an early issue of X-factor where the team is on a planet about to be judged by Arishem. The planet is teeming with mutants , Jean Grey channels the combined power of the inhabitants to destroy Arishems Hand as he judges them unworthy. The celestials then leave as the locals have proved themselves.

Also there was a Thor story dealing with Ego the living planet which was shown to be the developing stage of a new celestial. Hercules was consumed during the process. Cryonic101 14:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

i think this was the black galaxy saga--Princekilderkin (talk) 23:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Page Organization

I wonder if this article should be organized according to the comics history of the Celestials, i.e. with Kirby's work first, then the later additions of other writers and artists. As it is now, the article might be confusing to a newcomer. I think it would be worthwhile doing this for all Eternals articles. Biff Loman 14:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

how in the hell did sue storm crack a celestials armor...when even thor couldn't?

It was due to the nature of Sue Storm's powers. She draws the energy to create her forcefields from one of the higher planes of hyperspace and the since the Celestials also draw their power from hyperspace she was able to interefere with that connection and thus shatter Exitar. Makes me wonder what Hyperstorm, a being who had total mastery over hyperspace, could do to a Celestial. TheBalance 00:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

FYI

A great deal of text was removed from this article recently, as seen here: [1]

That's Asgardian again, executing his "cut and diminish" agenda. CovenantD 21:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

You don't even know if it is Asgardian. Or do you? Brian Boru is awesome 06:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm about as sure as one can be without resorting to checkuser. Just look at the edits. Same articles, same style, often the same edits. CovenantD 14:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

You know you're just accusing said user without proof. I don't know if the same style means same person. Request checkuser and then you see if same person. That's my take on things. Brian Boru is awesome 17:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I've been spotting socks long enough to see similarities in style for what they are and not don't make such statements lightly. I've been correct every single time an editor has been checked. Checkuser is a last resort process and isn't for fishing expeditions; it should only be requested when there is a violation of Wikipedia policies, which I don't see here. CovenantD 17:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I can't see a reason why not reverting these changes directly! When someone trashes the work of others, without login, without further explanation or notice, without asking how others think about it, for me this is pure vandalism! What do you think? - Weapon X (de) 13:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I made a small edit to the beginning of the 'character biography' section stating that thusfar no Celestial has ever been seen without it's armour off and that it's possible they may be being of pure enery who are their armour. It doesn't really add anything to the article as such, but I thought it sort of added to the enigmatic feel of the section as a whole. HalfShadow 05:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I decided to take a bulk of the cut material and make a new page out of it, since it's really too much for this article: List of Celestials members - I'll try to get some editing going on to improve it a bit. BOZ (talk • contribs) 00:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC).

• The article in it's old form was unfortunately far too long and not very written. It read like a fan page. But, the entry is now looking fairly sharp. I've tidied up the look of the page as the Cosmic Marvel list destroyed it. The only place that it seems to be able to sit without disrupting the text is at the very bottom of the page. I think it may need to be reduced to just a logo as opposed to listing ALL the relevant characters. I also pulled the Tiamut picture as you can hardly see him and it also disrupts the text. Hope it helps.

Asgardian 07:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Scathan2.png

Image:Scathan2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Exitar2.png

Image:Exitar2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DreamingCelestial.png

Image:DreamingCelestial.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AshematheListener.jpg

Image:AshematheListener.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:OneAboveAll.png

Image:OneAboveAll.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)