User talk:194.109.22.147

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Moe ε 22:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

Your edit to List of laser types

Your recent edit to List of laser types was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 07:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Proxy

This IP address belongs to a proxy of XS4ALL, along with 194.109.22.148 and 194.109.22.149. Look here [1] for more info. 194.109.22.147 23:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Old Dutch, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 08:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to "Julie-Su"

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Madjohnflint 08:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to World Youth Day

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to World Youth Day, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 01:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during January 1 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If you believe this message to be in error, please leave a message at my talk page. -- Tlim7882 09:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Once again: it's a proxy, block unregistered users or accept occasional vandalism

If you wish not to be vandalized and miss out on some valuable edits, just block the address. Most of the people posting things through this proxy won't read this talk-page. This means that your "warnings" are useless most of the time, since almost nobody reads them. 194.109.22.147 09:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, I, for one, read them, because I think they're incredibly funny. ;-) As always I'm amazed by the naïve sillyness of the average wikipedia moderator/admin. 194.109.22.148 21:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm

Please don't remove AfD notices if the discussion is still ongoing. Thanks!-DESU 12:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism, block avoidance. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 03:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Gwernol 03:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want to appeal this block, edit this page and place {{unblock|reason}} at the bottom of the page (or on your other IP adddress' talk page). Remember to write a clear, calm explanation of why you should be unblocked instead of the word "reason". As a word of advice, if you continue to rant and insult people it will significantly reduce your chances of being unblocked. Gwernol 03:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

194.109.22.147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You've been lazy, you did not read why I purposely placed the exact same insults BACK to the person insulting me that way on my talk-page, and now you're trying to turn your stupid behavior around by blaming others and erasing my comments about it on your talkpage? How obvious. And you expect me to NOT insult you now? Give us a break! You've blocked my home-IP for 6 months, without even giving a clear reasoning behind it. Now you're calling it 'harrassment' from my end. One comment by me is now considered that, only because it suits YOUR censorship. Telling me to calm down. Get a clue. Calm down yourself! You also seem to have missed that I was already blocked from editing my talk-page, so I could and can not "appeal the block" in any way. I find such laziness and such blatant dictatorial fascism of your type VERY insulting. You can kiss my ass with your bullshit attempts at 'reason' or the Mr Nice guy attempts you're trying to mask your censorship by. I rest my case: You insult me, I will insult you back. You 'admins' started it, long ago. I will not forget. 194.109.22.147 (talk) 05:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (on behalf of 195.64.95.116, of which appealing the editing-block for the talk-page has never been an option, you DUMB Administrator you!)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You've been lazy, you did not read why I purposely placed the exact same insults BACK to the person insulting me that way on my talk-page, and now you're trying to turn your stupid behavior around by blaming others and erasing my comments about it on your talkpage? How obvious. And you expect me to NOT insult you now? Give us a break! You've blocked my home-IP for 6 months, without even giving a clear reasoning behind it. Now you're calling it 'harrassment' from my end. One comment by me is now considered that, only because it suits YOUR censorship. Telling me to calm down. Get a clue. Calm down yourself! You also seem to have missed that I was already blocked from editing my talk-page, so I could and can not "appeal the block" in any way. I find such laziness and such blatant dictatorial fascism of your type VERY insulting. You can kiss my ass with your bullshit attempts at 'reason' or the Mr Nice guy attempts you're trying to mask your censorship by. I rest my case: You insult me, I will insult you back. You 'admins' started it, long ago. I will not forget. [[Special:Contributions/194.109.22.147|194.109.22.147]] ([[User talk:194.109.22.147#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (on behalf of 195.64.95.116, of which appealing the editing-block for the talk-page has never been an option, you DUMB Administrator you!) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You've been lazy, you did not read why I purposely placed the exact same insults BACK to the person insulting me that way on my talk-page, and now you're trying to turn your stupid behavior around by blaming others and erasing my comments about it on your talkpage? How obvious. And you expect me to NOT insult you now? Give us a break! You've blocked my home-IP for 6 months, without even giving a clear reasoning behind it. Now you're calling it 'harrassment' from my end. One comment by me is now considered that, only because it suits YOUR censorship. Telling me to calm down. Get a clue. Calm down yourself! You also seem to have missed that I was already blocked from editing my talk-page, so I could and can not "appeal the block" in any way. I find such laziness and such blatant dictatorial fascism of your type VERY insulting. You can kiss my ass with your bullshit attempts at 'reason' or the Mr Nice guy attempts you're trying to mask your censorship by. I rest my case: You insult me, I will insult you back. You 'admins' started it, long ago. I will not forget. [[Special:Contributions/194.109.22.147|194.109.22.147]] ([[User talk:194.109.22.147#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (on behalf of 195.64.95.116, of which appealing the editing-block for the talk-page has never been an option, you DUMB Administrator you!) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You've been lazy, you did not read why I purposely placed the exact same insults BACK to the person insulting me that way on my talk-page, and now you're trying to turn your stupid behavior around by blaming others and erasing my comments about it on your talkpage? How obvious. And you expect me to NOT insult you now? Give us a break! You've blocked my home-IP for 6 months, without even giving a clear reasoning behind it. Now you're calling it 'harrassment' from my end. One comment by me is now considered that, only because it suits YOUR censorship. Telling me to calm down. Get a clue. Calm down yourself! You also seem to have missed that I was already blocked from editing my talk-page, so I could and can not "appeal the block" in any way. I find such laziness and such blatant dictatorial fascism of your type VERY insulting. You can kiss my ass with your bullshit attempts at 'reason' or the Mr Nice guy attempts you're trying to mask your censorship by. I rest my case: You insult me, I will insult you back. You 'admins' started it, long ago. I will not forget. [[Special:Contributions/194.109.22.147|194.109.22.147]] ([[User talk:194.109.22.147#top|talk]]) 05:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (on behalf of 195.64.95.116, of which appealing the editing-block for the talk-page has never been an option, you DUMB Administrator you!) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}