Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-polygamy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. [[User:Spatfield|spatfield]] July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC) |
I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. [[User:Spatfield|spatfield]] July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''; I would have said merge with [[polygamy]], except that the article really says nothing at all so there wouldn't be any point. [[User:Dcarrano|Dcarrano]] July 9, 2005 18:02 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''; I would have said merge with [[polygamy]], except that the article really says nothing at all so there wouldn't be any point. [[User:Dcarrano|Dcarrano]] July 9, 2005 18:02 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Concur with [[User:Dcarrano|Dcarrano]]. [[User:Fernando Rizo|Fernando Rizo]] 9 July 2005 18:06 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:06, 9 July 2005
I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. spatfield July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC)
- Delete; I would have said merge with polygamy, except that the article really says nothing at all so there wouldn't be any point. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 18:02 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur with Dcarrano. Fernando Rizo 9 July 2005 18:06 (UTC)