Talk:Resistance (Terminator): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==original research== |
==original research== |
||
Where is it that the T-X is more advanced? It seems much less advanced than the T-1000, and they occur in different timelines... (there is no way a T-X could destroy a T-1000, or for that matter, Arnie's terminator couldn't destroy it either). [[Special:Contributions/132.205.44.5|132.205.44.5]] ([[User talk:132.205.44.5|talk]]) 23:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
Where is it that the T-X is more advanced? It seems much less advanced than the T-1000, and they occur in different timelines... (there is no way a T-X could destroy a T-1000, or for that matter, Arnie's terminator couldn't destroy it either). [[Special:Contributions/132.205.44.5|132.205.44.5]] ([[User talk:132.205.44.5|talk]]) 23:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
The T-X was designed specifically to terminate other terminators, hence why it is armed with a Nano-Disrupter (.222), which allows it to destroy nano-based terminators like the T-1000 with ease. It's actually a hybrid of the traditional endoskeleton model, and the nano-based models, so it incorporates the best aspects of each. Perhaps not more advanced per se, but definitely more innovative. Its onboard weapons make it worlds better than the T-1000. |
|||
Revision as of 20:30, 16 January 2008
Aside from an ambiguous reference to the "Terminator franchise" there was no indication that this was an article about a fictional organization. Added the word 'fictional' to the first sentence and a cleanup message. --Yatta 03:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Tech-Com is a Branch
Tech-Com is a branch of the resistance, not the name of the resistance itself. Please revert this article.
A lot of this seems to be based on anticiliary material
such as video games and comic books. It would help if the reader knew that much of the material in this page is not canonical. Serendipodous 15:35, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
original research
Where is it that the T-X is more advanced? It seems much less advanced than the T-1000, and they occur in different timelines... (there is no way a T-X could destroy a T-1000, or for that matter, Arnie's terminator couldn't destroy it either). 132.205.44.5 (talk) 23:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
The T-X was designed specifically to terminate other terminators, hence why it is armed with a Nano-Disrupter (.222), which allows it to destroy nano-based terminators like the T-1000 with ease. It's actually a hybrid of the traditional endoskeleton model, and the nano-based models, so it incorporates the best aspects of each. Perhaps not more advanced per se, but definitely more innovative. Its onboard weapons make it worlds better than the T-1000.