Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-polygamy: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Mysekurity (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Well said, Dcarrano. --[[User:Idont havaname|Idont Havaname]] 20:26, 9 July 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Well said, Dcarrano. --[[User:Idont havaname|Idont Havaname]] 20:26, 9 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', a redirect to [[polygamy]] probably wouldn't hurt --[[User:Tothebarricades.tk|Tothebarricades]] 23:05, July 9, 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', a redirect to [[polygamy]] probably wouldn't hurt --[[User:Tothebarricades.tk|Tothebarricades]] 23:05, July 9, 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - (im copying Idont Havaname in congratulating Dcarrano on his well-putness) -[[User:Mysekurity|'''my''']][[User_talk:Mysekurity|sekurity]] 05:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:29, 10 July 2005
I find this article to be POV and it's very premise is non-sensical to me, Anti-polygamy does not sound like a good title for a "debate" on polygamy. Furthermore, no other pages currently link to it. spatfield July 9, 2005 16:48 (UTC)
- Delete; I would have said merge with polygamy, except that the article really says nothing at all so there wouldn't be any point. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 18:02 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur with Dcarrano. Fernando Rizo 9 July 2005 18:06 (UTC)
- Delete, concur with above. --Scimitar 9 July 2005 18:07 (UTC)
- Delete. Well said, Dcarrano. --Idont Havaname 20:26, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, a redirect to polygamy probably wouldn't hurt --Tothebarricades 23:05, July 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - (im copying Idont Havaname in congratulating Dcarrano on his well-putness) -mysekurity 05:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)