Wikipedia:Featured article review/Guqin/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by SeizureDog - "→Guqin: " |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Guqin]]=== |
===[[Guqin]]=== |
||
:''Notified [[User:CharlieHuang]] and [[User:Badagnani]]'' <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:SeizureDog|SeizureDog]] ([[User talk:SeizureDog|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/SeizureDog|contribs]]) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:''Notified [[User:CharlieHuang]] and [[User:Badagnani]]'' |
|||
The article was promoted over a year ago and has [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Guqin&oldid=33408887 since changed drastically]. |
The article was promoted over a year ago and has [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Guqin&oldid=33408887 since changed drastically]. |
||
Revision as of 20:41, 18 January 2008
- Notified User:CharlieHuang and User:Badagnani —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeizureDog (talk • contribs) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The article was promoted over a year ago and has since changed drastically.
Issues at hand:
- I feel that the article may fail criteria 1(a). After going through and correcting many minor errors, I feel uncomfortable that I, a single editor, am finding so much to fix. I believe a thorough copyedit is in order.
- The popular culture section. This was completely absent when promoted. I feel that it should be removed as trivia, but such sections are still a sticky subject with many.
- The "Players" section goes against Wikipedia:Embedded list.
- There are more references given than in-line citations provided. A tad worrisome for a FA article. The number of external links is also rather large.
These are just some of the few issues that I'm seeing. I'm not the best at this, which is why I'm bringing it to the attention of FAR.--SeizureDog (talk) 20:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)