Talk:Vicious circle: Difference between revisions
→Merger proposal: explain removal of merge tags |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The word you want is "monetize." Fixing the text isn't enough here; the original poster needs to re-do his graphics as well. |
The word you want is "monetize." Fixing the text isn't enough here; the original poster needs to re-do his graphics as well. |
||
[[User:DoctorJS3|DoctorJS3]] 20:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
[[User:DoctorJS3|DoctorJS3]] 20:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Euthyphro Dilemma == |
|||
[[Euthyphro dilemma]] is cited as another example of cycle, but it is not a cycle at all, rather a dilemma about the implications of two hypotheses in theistic moral. The only "cycle" it could imply would be a mutual logical lack, which cannot be properly called a vicious nor virtuous cycle because it does not concern cyclic reinforcement. I suggest that the reference to this dillemma be removed. [[Special:Contributions/24.202.61.223|24.202.61.223]] ([[User talk:24.202.61.223|talk]]) 03:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:40, 21 January 2008
Merger proposal
I oppose merging the Vicious circle article with this one. That article is a dab page, and this one describes economic and organizational theories in detail. Bry9000 (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's been three weeks since the merge tag was added with no other comments, so I removed the merge tag. Bry9000 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Name of article
shouldnt this be viscious cycle?
- Nope. Vicious is right, no S. Christopher Parham (talk) 2005 June 29 06:25 (UTC)
The images don't look right. Some of the ovals have been cropped. Swirlix 01:36, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
History of theory?
I'm helping someone with a thesis, and they want to use "Virtuous Circle" as the theoretical backbone. I'm having trouble finding the person who first developed the theory . . . Can it be attributed to one source? It sounds like it, especially with the "Twentieth Century" part. Can anyone help? Thanks!
CMF —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Engender (talk • contribs) 7 March, 2006.
The comment about austin powers's movie seems a bit misplaced here. I think it should be deleted. Zé - 21/08/2006
Indeed. Fat Bastard's particular example of the vicious cycle seems unnecessary.
Question on Reciprocal Altruism & Virtuous Cycle
How are these 2 different ? --பராசக்தி 16:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
"Monetarize" is not a word =
The word you want is "monetize." Fixing the text isn't enough here; the original poster needs to re-do his graphics as well. DoctorJS3 20:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Euthyphro Dilemma
Euthyphro dilemma is cited as another example of cycle, but it is not a cycle at all, rather a dilemma about the implications of two hypotheses in theistic moral. The only "cycle" it could imply would be a mutual logical lack, which cannot be properly called a vicious nor virtuous cycle because it does not concern cyclic reinforcement. I suggest that the reference to this dillemma be removed. 24.202.61.223 (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)