From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 39:
Line 39:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|- style="background-color:#FAF7EF"
|- style="background-color:#FAF7EF"
! style="width: 110px; font-size:100%; text-align: left"| [[image:Flag of the United States.svg|30px]] [[USA]]
! style="width: 100px ; font-size:100%; text-align: left"| [[image:Flag of the United States.svg|30px]] [[USA]]
! colspan="12" style="width: 1000px; font-size:125%"|1942 Oil and Coal Comparison Table for 1941 Railroad Freight Train Service
! colspan="12" style="width: 1000px; font-size:125%"|1942 Oil and Coal Comparison Table for 1941 Railroad Freight Train Service
Revision as of 17:11, 24 January 2008
This user has made Wikipedia article contributions between May 2006 and January 2008
Ross Rifle bayonet (deleted)
Socialist Party of British Columbia (Chronology chapter, recently changed)
Foothills Medical Centre (Chronology chapter)
encyclopedia editor R. D. Hilton Smith (stub article)
Haradh (production area of S Ghawar oil field) (in progress)
Mandal Commission protests of 1990 (stub)
Hospitalization Benefits Plan (stub)
Mica Dam (History chapter started)
Mackenzie Valley Pipeline, (added to Current Proposal section)
Templates
Template:Canadian coal mines begin
Template:Canadian Window and Door Manufacturer begin
Tables
Maya ceramics (timetables)
1942 Oil and Coal Comparison Table for 1941 Railroad Freight Train Service (fuel efficiency table)
USA
1942 Oil and Coal Comparison Table for 1941 Railroad Freight Train Service
Railroad [ 1] Percent of GTM[ 2] with Oil-burning
Locomotives
Oil Consumption,
Gallons / 1000 GTM
Section One
Two values,
for comparing
oil to coal
Gallons
of Oil
Per Ton
of Coal
Lbs. of Coal
Per Gal. of Oil
Three values,
Coal or equivalent used
per 1000 GTM
Oil Burn-
ing Locos
Coal Burn-
ing Locos
All
Locos
Section Two
Railroad fuel efficiency comparison
Ave. oil-to-coal value used:
140 Gal. / Ton of coal
Pounds of Coal / 1000 GTM
Gallons
Per Ton
Lbs. Per
Gallon
Oil Burn-
ing Locos
Coal Burn-
ing Locos
All
Locos
Group I
(1)
(2)
File:Northern pacific railway logo.PNG Northern Pacific
(BNSF, TX)
2.7
6.65
Great Northern
(BNSF, TX)
47.5
6.47
Milwaukee Road
(Soo Line, MN)
4.6
9.03
File:Burlingtonroute.gif Burlington
(BNSF, TX)
5.3
8.09
File:Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Herald.jpg Santa Fe
(BNSF, TX)
75.3
8.21
File:Union Pacific Logo.svg Union Pacific
19.7
10.85
North Western
(Union Pacific)
7.0
9.67
Missouri Pacific
(Union Pacific)
13.7
7.54
Averages
27.8
8.28
Group II
File:Western Pacific Railroad logo, color.jpg Western Pacific
(Union Pacific)
73.5
7.71
File:Kansas City Southern Herald.png Kansas City Southern
69.0
8.68
MK. & T
(Union Pacific)
99.8
7.09
Frisco
(Union Pacific)
40.8
9.06
File:SP logo.png Cotton Belt
(Union Pacific)
97.9
6.76
IGN, Texas
(Union Pacific)
100.0
9.08
File:Union Pacific Logo.svg T&NO, TX
(Union Pacific)
100.0
7.15
Texas and Pacific
(Missouri Pacific)
100.0
7.10
File:Chicago Rock Island and Pacific Herald.jpg Rock Island
(Union Pacific)
54.3
8.11
File:SP logo.png Southern Pacific
(Union Pacific)
93.3
8.39
Averages
81.4
8.00
Group I and II
Averages
45.9
8.12
^ Editors. Sixth Annual Proceedings of The Railway Fuel and Traveling Engineers' Association, 1942 , published by The Railway Fuel And Traveling Engineers' Association , 327 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois, 1942, pp. 96-106, Report of Committee Records and Statistics. Coal Equivalents of Locomotive Fuels and Power .
^ The percentage of a railroad company's Gross Ton Mileage (weight and distance of freight delivery) hauled using oil burning locomotives,
in the year 1941.
USA
