Talk:Project Chanology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:35, 24 January 2008

This may become one of the most important things to happen on the internet. I wouldn't be so quick to delete it.

This is an on-going event and is expanding rapidly, it should be maintained. LamontCranston 19:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is getting a lot of play over at Digg and other social media sites (here here and here for some examples). One of those links to a Wired article and I'm sure we can find lots of other news articles detailing this. I certainly wouldn't "speedy" delete this. Put it up for deletion the old fashioned way. JHMM13^(Disc) 08:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the fact that the article still doesn't assert the notability, Digg and other social media sites (i.e. any site with user-generated content) don't cut it as reliable sources. Dethme0w (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you need reliable media - Australian Personal Computer magazine has picked it up. They're the largest PC print publication in Australia. Article here. Deletion is wrong at this stage. Give it a few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flow aus (talk • contribs) 09:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should add that to the external links at least. I have removed the tags, but the article needs inline references. Dethme0w (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

This template must be substituted. Although I do think this whole thing is quite funny, 13 year old script kiddies on 4chan aren't significant enough for a Wikipedia article, especially without citations. DDoSes happen thousands of times ever day, not every one deserves an article. Miserlou (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :::If you need reliable media - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APC_%28magazine%29 Australian Personal Computer ] magazine has picked it up. They're the largest PC print publication in Australia. Article [http://www.apcmag.com/7905/anonymous_threatens_to_dismantle_church_of_scientology_via_internet here]. Deletion is wrong at this stage. Give it a few days.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Flow aus|Flow aus]] ([[User talk:Flow aus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Flow aus|contribs]]) 09:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :::: You should add that to the external links at least.  I have removed the tags, but the article needs inline references. [[User:Dethme0w|Dethme0w]] ([[User talk:Dethme0w|talk]]) 09:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
+== Deletion ==
+{{prod|Unencyclopedic}}
+Although I do think this whole thing is quite funny, 13 year old script kiddies on 4chan aren't significant enough for a Wikipedia article, especially without citations. DDoSes happen thousands of times ever day, not every one deserves an article.
+[[User:Miserlou|Miserlou]] ([[User talk:Miserlou|talk]]) 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)