Talk:FC Metalurh Donetsk: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:04, 24 January 2008

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.

Ukraine Unassessed

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Shouldn't it be spelt Metalurg Donetsk in English, that's the way I've seen it spelt. Yonatanh 13:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move (Jan. 2008)

Per Wikipedia:NC#Sports_teams, the question is whether the official name of the sports team under consideration has "no ambiguity" or "some ambiguity".

I think that the team's name is ambiguous, because it does not have an English-language website/section, nor is it broadly recognizable, and it is easily confused with another team FC Metalurh Zaporizhya.

Therefore per above naming convention, which states and I quote: “ (2) in cases where there is some ambiguity as to the official spelling of a club's name in English, the name most commonly used by the English-language media should be used (as determined using the number of hits at Google News) ”

This name seems to be: FC Metalurh Donetsk

Results:

"fc metalurh donetsk" [1] - 202 with uefa

"fc metalurg donetsk" [2] - 3 with uefa

Without uefa:

"fc metalurh donetsk" -uefa [3] - 13

"fc metalurg donetsk" -uefa [4] - 0

Because of above, the article should be moved to FC Metalurh Donetsk.--Riurik^(discuss) 21:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as nominator per reasoning explained above.--Riurik^(discuss) 21:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per above. --Ceriy (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The results are clear. Ostap 23:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 *'''Support''' - as nominator per reasoning explained above.--[[User:Riurik|Riurik]]<sup>[[User talk:Riurik|(discuss)]]</sup> 21:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' - per above. --[[User:Ceriy|Ceriy]] ([[User talk:Ceriy|talk]]) 21:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Support''' - The results are clear. [[User:Ostap R|Ostap]] 23:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)