User talk:142.167.87.205: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 192.45.72.26 - "→Keep an eye on...: " |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
What is wrong with you two? Having such a bad day? That is completely uncivil how you write here. My opinion is that it should be noted which members are the most famous and are most often ''referred'' to as the original band. There are many references out there, calling articles out there as being written by "dumbass writer(s)" is just crude. It is not "fancruft", it makes a clarification for readers of these articles. Man... |
What is wrong with you two? Having such a bad day? That is completely uncivil how you write here. My opinion is that it should be noted which members are the most famous and are most often ''referred'' to as the original band. There are many references out there, calling articles out there as being written by "dumbass writer(s)" is just crude. It is not "fancruft", it makes a clarification for readers of these articles. Man... |
||
Both of you could help out this project a lot more by assuming good faith in your fellow editors and trying to be civil. Instead you seem to attack people on here. I guess it is both cold in the middle of the UK and up in Canada. |
Both of you could help out this project a lot more by assuming good faith in your fellow editors and trying to be civil. Instead you seem to attack people on here. I guess it is both cold in the middle of the UK and up in Canada. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.45.72.26|192.45.72.26]] ([[User talk:192.45.72.26|talk]]) 01:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 01:04, 27 January 2008
Keep an eye on...
192.45.72.26 (talk · contribs)... He's trying add fancruft like "The original line-up most known by fans was Axl, Duff, Izzy, Slash, and Steven." to the GN'R article. They weren't in the original band, well Duff McKagan, Slash and Steven Adler weren't... I'm hesitant to revert again 'cause of the 3RR. Funeral 23:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers, I'll help you with 72.201. Funeral 23:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- [1] - He's using an article written by some dumbass writer who obviously doesn't know much about Guns N' Roses to back up his cruft now. Funeral 00:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'll write a reply soon, I'm busy with the 3RR thing, at the moment. Funeral 00:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
What is wrong with you two? Having such a bad day? That is completely uncivil how you write here. My opinion is that it should be noted which members are the most famous and are most often referred to as the original band. There are many references out there, calling articles out there as being written by "dumbass writer(s)" is just crude. It is not "fancruft", it makes a clarification for readers of these articles. Man...
Both of you could help out this project a lot more by assuming good faith in your fellow editors and trying to be civil. Instead you seem to attack people on here. I guess it is both cold in the middle of the UK and up in Canada. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.45.72.26 (talk) 01:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)