Duklja: Difference between revisions
→History: bits about Mihailo copied from the list of Serbian monarchs |
Harvardian (talk | contribs) Readded image removed by Pannonian |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image: |
[[Image:Serb_lands03.jpg|thumb|300px|Duklja in the 9th century, according to [[De administrando imperio]]]] |
||
[[Image:Kpdai30.gif|thumb|300px|Greek map of the 9th century, according to [[De administrando imperio]]]] |
|||
'''Duklja''' ([[Latin]]: ''Doclea'' or ''Dioclea'', after the town of [[Bar, Serbia and Montenegro|Dioclea]]) was a medieval state located in modern-day [[Montenegro]] and northern [[Albania]] (including the city of [[Shkodër|Skadar]]). Duklja was [[vassal]] of the [[Eastern Roman Empire]] until it won its independence in the mid-[[11th century]], ruled by the [[House of Vojislavljević]]. |
|||
'''Duklja''' ([[Latin]]: ''Doclea'' or ''Dioclea'', after the town of [[Bar, Serbia and Montenegro|Dioclea]]) was a vassal state of Byzantium until it won its independence in [[1042]], ruled by the '''Vojislavljevic Dynasty''', located in Zeta, or modern [[Montenegro]] and northern [[Albania]] including the city of [[Shkodër|Skadar]]. |
|||
==Name== |
|||
"Doclea" the name of the region during the early period of the [[Roman Empire]], was termed for an early [[Illyria]]n tribe. In later centuries, Romans "hyper-corrected" to "Dioclea" wrongly guessing that an "I" had been lost due to vulgar speech patterns. "Duklja" is the later Slavic version of that word. |
"Doclea" the name of the region during the early period of the [[Roman Empire]], was termed for an early [[Illyria]]n tribe. In later centuries, Romans "hyper-corrected" to "Dioclea" wrongly guessing that an "I" had been lost due to vulgar speech patterns. "Duklja" is the later Slavic version of that word. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The relationship between the |
||
==History== |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
One of the famous mentions of Duklja is the [[Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja]] which was written by a priest from Dioclea (Bar) around [[1180]]-[[1196]] and which includes various information about these and related territories. |
One of the famous mentions of Duklja is the [[Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja]] which was written by a priest from Dioclea (Bar) around [[1180]]-[[1196]] and which includes various information about these and related territories. |
||
| Line 16: | Line 12: | ||
Duklja was populated by Christians of the [[Latin Rite]] and was initially usually under the suzerainty of the [[Byzantine Empire]] or of [[Bulgaria]] up to the [[11th century]] when the dukes of Duklja started having noticeable success in their struggle for independence. |
Duklja was populated by Christians of the [[Latin Rite]] and was initially usually under the suzerainty of the [[Byzantine Empire]] or of [[Bulgaria]] up to the [[11th century]] when the dukes of Duklja started having noticeable success in their struggle for independence. |
||
Starting in [[1036]], Dobroslav, also called Stephen Vojislav |
Starting in [[1036]], Dobroslav, also called Stephen Vojislav, who was a descendent of Serbian (from Travunia), liberated Duklja from the Bulgarians for a short period. Later his achievements were repeated by his descendents Mihail[[1050]]-[[1082]] in time od Mihailo Zeta become a kingdom in[[1077]], Bodin[[1082]]-[[1101]] was a son of Mihailo and son in law of Normandian ruler Robert Gvinskar.After dead of Bodin Duklja didn`t have any powerful rulers and fights over crown were more and more often when finally [[Stefan Nemanja]] who later expanded [[Raska|Raška]] to include Duklja and other Catholic territories and became the founder of the [[Nemanjic|Nemanjić Serbian royal dynasty]], the first dynasty to have a member of it recognized by the Pope ([[Stefan Prvovencani|Stefan Prvovenčani]] in [[1217]]). |
||
| ⚫ | Nemanja himself was initially baptized under Roman rite like the other rulers of Duklja, and later rebaptized under [[Byzantine Rite]]. He gave the rule over Duklja to his son Vukan Nemanjić, and due to the difference in religions the two ostensibly united territories were at odds. Eventually though the Serbian influence prevailed. |
||
Another important ruler was Bodin ([[1082]]-[[1101]]), a son of Mihailo and son-in-law of the Normandian ruler [[Robert Guiscard]]. After the death of Bodin, Duklja didn't have any powerful rulers and fights over the crown were became more common. Other Vojislavljević rulers after Bodin included Vukan, Marko, Uroš I, Uroš II. |
|||
| ⚫ | The relationship between the regions of Duklja and [[Zeta (state)|Zeta]] is somewhat unclear. Duklja was mostly referenced as the [[littoral]] area between the [[Bay of Kotor]] and the [[Skadar Lake]], while Zeta refers to the river located inland and is thus the more accurate predecessor of the 19th century [[Montenegro]]. According to another interpretation, Duklja was composed of Zeta and Travunja (Travunja was roughly today's eastern [[Herzegovina]] and [[Konavle]]). In any event, the name "Duklja" went out of use by the end of the Middle Ages. |
||
Finally, in [[1186]] [[Stefan Nemanja]] expanded [[Raska|Raška]] to include Duklja and other Catholic territories. Stefan Nemanja was the founder of the [[Nemanjic|Nemanjić Serbian royal dynasty]], the first dynasty to have a member of it recognized by the Pope ([[Stefan Prvovencani|Stefan Prvovenčani]] in [[1217]]). |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Nemanja himself was initially baptized under Roman rite like the other rulers of Duklja, and later rebaptized under [[Byzantine Rite]]. He gave the rule over Duklja to his son Vukan Nemanjić, and due to the difference in religions the two ostensibly united territories were at odds. Eventually though the |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:Serbian history]] |
[[Category:Serbian history]] |
||
Revision as of 02:38, 14 July 2005
Duklja (Latin: Doclea or Dioclea, after the town of Dioclea) was a vassal state of Byzantium until it won its independence in 1042, ruled by the Vojislavljevic Dynasty, located in Zeta, or modern Montenegro and northern Albania including the city of Skadar.
"Doclea" the name of the region during the early period of the Roman Empire, was termed for an early Illyrian tribe. In later centuries, Romans "hyper-corrected" to "Dioclea" wrongly guessing that an "I" had been lost due to vulgar speech patterns. "Duklja" is the later Slavic version of that word.
It was one of the four southern Dalmatian Slavic duchies, other three being Narenta (Pagania), Zahumlje and Travunia that weren't united under either Croatia to the northwest or Rascia (Serbia) to the northeast.
One of the famous mentions of Duklja is the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja which was written by a priest from Dioclea (Bar) around 1180-1196 and which includes various information about these and related territories.
Duklja was populated by Christians of the Latin Rite and was initially usually under the suzerainty of the Byzantine Empire or of Bulgaria up to the 11th century when the dukes of Duklja started having noticeable success in their struggle for independence.
Starting in 1036, Dobroslav, also called Stephen Vojislav, who was a descendent of Serbian (from Travunia), liberated Duklja from the Bulgarians for a short period. Later his achievements were repeated by his descendents Mihail1050-1082 in time od Mihailo Zeta become a kingdom in1077, Bodin1082-1101 was a son of Mihailo and son in law of Normandian ruler Robert Gvinskar.After dead of Bodin Duklja didn`t have any powerful rulers and fights over crown were more and more often when finally Stefan Nemanja who later expanded Raška to include Duklja and other Catholic territories and became the founder of the Nemanjić Serbian royal dynasty, the first dynasty to have a member of it recognized by the Pope (Stefan Prvovenčani in 1217).
Nemanja himself was initially baptized under Roman rite like the other rulers of Duklja, and later rebaptized under Byzantine Rite. He gave the rule over Duklja to his son Vukan Nemanjić, and due to the difference in religions the two ostensibly united territories were at odds. Eventually though the Serbian influence prevailed.
The relationship between the regions of Duklja and Zeta is somewhat unclear. Duklja was mostly referenced as the littoral area between the Bay of Kotor and the Skadar Lake, while Zeta refers to the river located inland and is thus the more accurate predecessor of the 19th century Montenegro. According to another interpretation, Duklja was composed of Zeta and Travunja (Travunja was roughly today's eastern Herzegovina and Konavle). In any event, the name "Duklja" went out of use by the end of the Middle Ages.