User talk:Cordeyn

Don't be skank ho bitch

Thank you.

I guess since you were nigger lover and all you forgot "nappy headed ho". Cordeyn (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 04:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries like this are definitely unnecessary. Wikipedia has a strict biographies of living persons policy. That applies to all of Wikipedia, including edit summaries. You may also want to see WP:DENY. This could be considered a legal threat, which is forbidden on Wikipedia. I would strongly suggest you walk away from this little dispute. Mr.Z-man 04:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

It's a justifiable legal threat. Would you let me get away with calling every admin on this site a pedo for no reason? Cordeyn (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I've already blocked him for the comment and blanked the thread, making threats only serves to escalate the situation. In the future, please report such comments to WP:ANI. Mr.Z-man 04:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I think the anon should be unblocked because he's fun to revert, but the librarian guy should be kept blocked infinitely. Cordeyn (talk) 04:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree entirely. But fortunately, rumor has it that some anons are simply unblockable...