Super Tuesday, 2008: Difference between revisions
Remove rubbish names; not seriously called that by anyone |
spelling! |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Image:Image-Super Duper Tuesday 2008.svg|thumb|320px|Twenty-four states held caucuses or primary elections on Super Tuesday, 2008. <font color="Blue">'''Blue'''</font> denotes Democratic-only caucuses (3), <font color="Red">'''Red'''</font> denotes Republican-only contests (2), and <font color="Purple">'''Purple'''</font> represents states holding elections for both parties (19). Note: [[American Samoa]] (not shown) is Democratic only.]] |
[[Image:Image-Super Duper Tuesday 2008.svg|thumb|320px|Twenty-four states held caucuses or primary elections on Super Tuesday, 2008. <font color="Blue">'''Blue'''</font> denotes Democratic-only caucuses (3), <font color="Red">'''Red'''</font> denotes Republican-only contests (2), and <font color="Purple">'''Purple'''</font> represents states holding elections for both parties (19). Note: [[American Samoa]] (not shown) is Democratic only.]] |
||
'''Super Tuesday''' is the name for 5 February 2008, the day on which the largest simultaneous number of state [[U.S. presidential primary|U.S. presidential primary elections]] |
'''Super Tuesday''' is the name for 5 February 2008, the day on which the largest simultaneous number of state [[U.S. presidential primary|U.S. presidential primary elections]] and caucuses in the history of U.S. primaries were held.<ref name="SJFPPbbc"> |
||
{{cite web |
{{cite web |
||
| last = Greene |
| last = Greene |
Revision as of 02:15, 7 February 2008
Template:Future election in the United States
Super Tuesday is the name for 5 February 2008, the day on which the largest simultaneous number of state U.S. presidential primary elections and caucuses in the history of U.S. primaries were held.[1] Twenty-four states and American Samoa¤ held either caucuses or primary elections for one or both parties on this date.[2] Additionally the week-long Democrats Abroad Global Primary began on this day.
The large number of states that held elections on February 5 could have shortened the period between the first caucus in Iowa, on January 3 2008, and the de facto selection of a party's nominee to just a few weeks.[3] Super Tuesday 2008 saw 52% of the Democratic and 41% of the Republican delegates awarded by early February 2008. By comparison, only about 1% of nominating convention delegates had been selected by that point in the 2000 election cycle.[4][5]
Names and prior election cycles
The name Super Duper Tuesday is a reference to earlier Super Tuesdays, which have always been the date on which the largest number of primaries were held. The term Super Duper Tuesday has been repeatedly re-coined to refer to even more states holding their primaries on this date, with the first recorded usage so far found dating back to 1985.[6] In 2004, Super Tuesday was on March 2.[3] In 2004, the equivalent cohort of primaries, on February 3 2004, was called Mini-Tuesday—only seven states held their primaries on that date.
On June 3 2007, the name Tsunami Tuesday—conveying the potential of the large number of simultaneous primaries to completely change the political landscape—was mentioned on Meet the Press during a round-table discussion with presidential campaign strategists James Carville, Bob Shrum, Mary Matalin, and Mike Murphy.
Coincidentally, Super Tuesday fell on Mardi Gras and the New York Giants victory parade in 2008. Furthermore, voting was hampered in several states by a major tornado outbreak that killed over 50.[7]
Scheduling
As of February 2007, eight states held primary or caucus elections on Super Tuesday, February 5, 2008: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Missouri, New Mexico Democrats, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah, and West Virginia Republicans‡.[3][8] However to increase their importance in the candidate selection process, several states moved up their contests, which some pundits criticized as being "pure self-interest."[1]
The following states changed their elections to February 5: Alaska,[9] Arizona,[10][11] California,[8] Colorado,[10] Connecticut,[12] Georgia,[9] Idaho Democrats,[13] Illinois,[14] Kansas Democrats†,[15] Massachusetts,[16] Minnesota,[17] Montana Republicans§,[18] New Jersey,[19] New York,[20] and Tennessee.[21]
In an attempt to keep states from moving their primary or caucus elections even earlier, the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee established penalties for states holding elections earlier than 5 February 2008.[4] As a result, the Democratic National Committee controversially stripped the states of Michigan and Florida of all convention delegates.[22] The Republican National Committee has reduced by half the number of convention delegates from five states: Wyoming, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida, and Michigan.[23]
Response
Advocates for earlier elections point out that voters could have fewer candidates to select from with a later contest, because candidates who do not fare well in the early primaries and caucuses often drop out. Likewise, presidential campaigns spend "big bucks" on advertising, hotel rooms, and campaign staff, which can be an economic boon to states holding earlier elections.[10]
Critics of the earlier polling date claim it will compress the primary campaign cycle down to a three week national campaign where only financially well-off candidates can compete. CNN political pundit Bill Schneider states:
Those states may move up on the calendar because they want a cut of the action. They want less attention paid to small states like Iowa and New Hampshire and more attention paid to big, diverse states like Florida and California. To run in those big states, you need big money and national name recognition. Obscure contenders need not apply.[3]
Others indicate it will ultimately leave voters out of the process. In a BBC News interview, William F. Galvin, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth said:
The people who are being left out of this are the voters, especially those who aren't active in party affairs ... There won't be enough time for voters to focus on these candidates.[1]
Regardless of the number of states moving their election dates earlier and earlier, New Hampshire vigorously maintains its 'first in the nation' primary status. By New Hampshire state law, the secretary of state has sole discretion to set the date of the primary. Bill Gardner, the Secretary of State of New Hampshire for the past 31 years, did not rule out any dates for the primary election, and even intimated that "it could be this year 2007."[1] Ultimately, however, the New Hampshire primary was held on January 8 2008.
Delegate allocation
Democratic
Under Democratic Party rules, all delegates are awarded via proportional representation, with a minimum 15% threshold required to receive delegates. A total of 1,688 delegates were pledged by the results of the February 5th votes.
Republican
The Republican Party does not mandate a proportional representation system for delegate selection, but instead allows each state to determine its selection process. A total of 1,069 delegates will be pledged by the results of the February 5th votes.
Results
State | Democratic Winner | % of Popular Vote | # Delegates Won [24] | Republican Winner | % of Popular Vote | # Delegates Won | Show/Place Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | Barack Obama | 56% | 20 | Mike Huckabee | 41% | ||
Alaska (C) | Barack Obama | 75% | 9 | Mitt Romney | |||
American Samoa¤ (C) | Hillary Clinton | 57% | 2 | - | - | - | |
Arizona | Hillary Clinton | 51% | 26 | John McCain | 48% | 50 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Arkansas | Hillary Clinton | 73% | 23 | Mike Huckabee | 62% | ||
California | Hillary Clinton | 53% | 42 | John McCain | 44% | ||
Colorado (C) | Barack Obama | 67% | 13 | Mitt Romney | 57% | ||
Connecticut | Barack Obama | 51% | 26 | John McCain | 52% | 27 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Delaware | Barack Obama | 53% | 9 | John McCain | 45% | 18 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Georgia | Barack Obama | 67% | 27 | Mike Huckabee | 34% | 69 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Idaho (C) | Barack Obama | 79% | 15 | - | - | - | |
Illinois | Barack Obama | 65% | 62 | John McCain | 47% | ||
Kansas† (C) | Barack Obama | 74% | 23 | - | - | - | |
Massachusetts | Hillary Clinton | 56% | 54 | Mitt Romney | 51% | ||
Minnesota (C) | Barack Obama | 67% | 48 | Mitt Romney | 42% | ||
Missouri | Barack Obama | 49% | 30 | John McCain | 33% | 58 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Montana§ (C) | - | - | - | Mitt Romney | 38% | 25 | |
New Jersey | Hillary Clinton | 54% | 51 | John McCain | 55% | 52 | (WTA for Rep.) |
New Mexico (C) | - | - | - | ||||
New York | Hillary Clinton | 57% | 127 | John McCain | 51% | 101 | (WTA for Rep.) |
North Dakota (C) | Barack Obama | 61% | 8 | Mitt Romney | 36% | 8 | |
Oklahoma | Hillary Clinton | 55% | 24 | John McCain | 37% | 32 | |
Tennessee | Hillary Clinton | 54% | 34 | Mike Huckabee | 34% | 21 | |
Utah | Barack Obama | 57% | 14 | Mitt Romney | 88% | 36 | (WTA for Rep.) |
West Virginia‡ | - | - | - | Mike Huckabee | 52% | 18 | (WTA for Rep.) |
Notes
- † The Kansas state legislature voted to neither fund nor hold a primary in 2008.[15]
- ‡ West Virginia Republicans will select 18 of their 30 delegates on February 5, with the final 12 chosen on May 13.[15]
- § Montana Republicans chose to select delegates using a "closed caucus" comprising approximately 3,000 Republican elected officials and state party officials, such as precinct captains.[18]
- ¤ American Samoa is an unincorporated territory of the United States with three delegates to the Democratic National Convention, but no vote in the Presidential election.
- (C) denotes states and territories holding caucuses.
- (WTA) means Winner Takes All.
Popular Vote Percentages reflect the percentage within each party, not state overall total votes cast.
Summary
===Democratics===
Hillary Clinton | Barack Obama | |
---|---|---|
Number of states won | 9 | 14 |
Number of delegates won | 575 | 589 |
Republicans
John McCain | Mitt Romney | Mike Huckabee | Ron Paul | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of states won | 9 | 7 | 5 | 0 |
Number of delegates won | 306 | 60 | 52 | 24[25] |
References
- ^ a b c d Greene, Richard Allen (2007-05-30). "States jostle for primary power". BBC News. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ "Presidential primary and caucus dates" (PDF). Stateline.org. Pew Research Center. 2007-08-30. p. 1. Retrieved 2007-08-31.
- ^ a b c d Schneider, Bill (2007-02-07). "It could all be over after 'Super Duper Tuesday'". CNN. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ a b Mooney, Brian C. (2007-08-21), "Michigan set to send slate of primaries into revision", The Boston Globe, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^ Balz, Dan (2008-01-15), "Feb. 5 Primaries to Pose A Super Test of Strategy", The Washington Post, pp. A01, retrieved 2008-01-22
- ^ Barrett, Grant (2007-03-29). "Double-Tongued Dictionary entry for Super-Duper Tuesday". Retrieved 2008-01-28.
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/weather/02/05/tornado.bad.weather/index.html
- ^ a b
"California primary move creates Super-duper Tuesday". CNN. 2007-03-15. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b
Kapochunas, Rachel (2007-05-30), "Georgia, Alaska Join [[5 February]] Front-Loading Frenzy", The New York Times, retrieved 2007-06-03
{{citation}}
: More than one of|work=
and|newspaper=
specified (help); URL–wikilink conflict (help) - ^ a b c "Earlier primary boosts Arizona in several ways", Arizona Daily Star, Tucson, Arizona, 2007-08-23, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^
Wilson, Reid (2007-08-30). "A Calendar In Chaos". RealClearPolitics. Fox News Channel. Retrieved 2008-01-12.
The event, dubbed "Super Duper Tuesday," got more crowded this week when Arizona became the twenty-first state to announce plans to hold their primary that day.
- ^ "Our view: Candidates deserve our attention now", Norwich Bulletin, Norwich, Connecticut, 2007-08-18, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^
"Democrats re-elect chairman Stallings, change caucus date" (Press release). Idaho Democratic Party. 2007-03-05. Retrieved 2007-08-06.
the state central committee selected 5 February 2008, as the party's new presidential caucus date
- ^ Rick, Pearson (2007-06-21), "Illinois joins crush on Super Duper Tuesday", Chicago Tribune, retrieved 2007-06-21
- ^ a b c "State-by-state primary and caucus schedule". Campaign 2008. The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^ Maguire, Ken (2007-11-20), "Presidential Primary Appears Moving To February", The Boston Globe, vol. 122, no. 155, Boston, Massachusetts, retrieved 2007-08-31
- ^ von Sternberg, Bob (2007-07-11), "GOP moves its caucuses to Super Tuesday 2008 to gain national clout", Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Minnesota, retrieved 2007-08-06
- ^ a b Johnson, Charles (2007-12-27), "GOP Officials Outline How New Caucus Will Work", Missoulian, Missoula, Montana, retrieved 2008-01-02
- ^ Smothers, Ronald (2007-02-27), "New Jersey Moves to Join Early Presidential Primaries", The New York Times, retrieved 2007-06-03
- ^ "New York legislature votes to move up primary". Political Ticker. CNN. 2007-03-21. Retrieved 2007-06-03.
- ^
Dries, Bill (2007-08-17), "Repubs and Dems Fix On [[5 February]] as State Primary Date", The Daily News, vol. 122, no. 155, Memphis, Tennessee, retrieved 2007-08-31
{{citation}}
: URL–wikilink conflict (help) - ^ Martelle, Scott (2008-01-15). "Rancor runs deep among Michigan Democrats". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Gruver, Mead (2008-01-13). "Republicans stripped of delegates want them back". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/states/
- ^ Ron Paul 2008 PCC, http://ronpaul2008.typepad.com/ron_paul_2008/2008/02/ron-paul-nation.html
See also
External links
- State-by-state primary and caucus schedule by The Boston Globe
- 2008 Democratic Calendar by The New York Times
- 2008 Republican Calendar by The New York Times
- Select2008 - Comparisons and live polling on presidential candidates' positions and program
- Election Center 2008: Primary Results by date - Elections & Politics news from CNN.com