User talk:Canada-kawaii: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 05:58, 8 February 2008

Go ahead, complain about my rampant edits of the Vorarephilia article. Peace deals may be negotiable.

Ok. :3 Bawlix 01:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Canada-kawaii 01:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No XD Bawlix 12:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed 'List of paraphilias'

I appreciate that you don't like the idea of merging Vorarephilia into a larger list, but you should consider that this is probably the best way to prevent the article being deleted. As it stands, we haven't enough information to make Vorarephilia much more than a dictionary definition, which isn't really appropriate for Wikipedia. Although I think that the article (more specifically, the information in the article) does belong somewhere in Wikipedia, it is also a valid opinion that the article as it stands ought to be deleted.

Please realize that merging is not a permanent operation--if and when enough verifiable information is available to expand the article beyond a few sentences, it can be unmerged. Until then, though, merging is not a bad solution.

If you have any suggestions for a better way to handle a merge, then I will be happy to hear them; I hold no illusions as to my article-writing ability. I hope that we can come to a conclusion that is satisfactory for all of us. --Sopoforic 17:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about using IAR in an unusual way? Canada-kawaii 14:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Canada-kawaii/wow!

User:Canada-kawaii/wow!, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Canada-kawaii/wow! and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Canada-kawaii/wow! during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Solumeiras (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is for archive purposes only. Wikipedia should have an archive, and that's what I'm doing. Canada-kawaii (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Human

Good one. Although I'm almost tempted to vandalize it by moving the status of humanity to threatened :) I wonder what it would be like if that were true... hmmm... as if we would be sitting around editing Wikipedia! Keep up the good work. Okiefromokla ^questions? 05:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 [[User:Canada-kawaii/wow!]], a page you created, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Canada-kawaii/wow!]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).  You are free to edit the content of [[User:Canada-kawaii/wow!]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion.  Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> [[User:Solumeiras|Solumeiras]] ([[User talk:Solumeiras|talk]]) 15:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 :It is for archive purposes only. Wikipedia should have an archive, and that's what I'm doing. [[User:Canada-kawaii|Canada-kawaii]] ([[User talk:Canada-kawaii#top|talk]]) 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
+==Your edit to Human==
+Good one. Although I'm almost tempted to vandalize it by moving the status of humanity to threatened :) I wonder what it would be like if that were true... hmmm... as if we would be sitting around editing Wikipedia! Keep up the good work. [[User:Okiefromokla|Okiefromokla]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Okiefromokla|questions?]]</sup></small> 05:58, 8 February 2008 (UTC)