Talk:Natalie Gauci: Difference between revisions
Dyinghappy (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 19:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
[[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] ([[User talk:BetacommandBot|talk]]) 19:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Song and album comments == |
|||
In both the [[Here I Am (Natalie Gauci song)]] and [[The Winner's Journey (Natalie Gauci album)]] there is comment about the lack of popularity of the song and album, yet these facts have been censored from the article on [[Natalie Gauci]] here, primary by [[User:Violetion]]. I do not completely understand why this is, as the unpopularity of the song and album, in comparison to prior Idol winners, is relevant, factual, provable, sourced, and important to the topic. Whether people from [[Malta]] might have liked one of Natalie Gauci's performances, or what one newspaper might have said is borderline relevant, but a large factor, such as the fact that both her debut album and debut single are the least popular debut releases by an Idol winner in its 5 year history is quite significant. This omission is especially confusing given that in the articles on both the song and album they lack of popularity is listed. It appears to me that there is a violation of [[WP:OWN]] going on here. [[User:Dyinghappy|Dyinghappy]] ([[User talk:Dyinghappy|talk]]) 20:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:34, 9 February 2008
 | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Australia: Music Start‑class   | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
There is too much vandalism on this page, Jealous fans are posting un-sourced and un-true negative statements on this page. Any unsourced negative comments will be deleted. 144.139.29.18 (talk) 03:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
can we please change the picture. i think an actual photo of natalie would be better and look better than a single cover —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.210.38 (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Can you change the current picture to a better pic, that is not the best picture of natalie.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.138.47.208 (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC) I know the picture has been changed, but this still isnt a good picture. u can hardly see her face. can it be changed. if possible —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.210.38 (talk) 09:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC) WELL SUX 4 U :@ (Violetion (talk) 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC))lol u picked an awesome pic!!!!!!!!
Fair use rationale for Image:88697208692.jpg
Image:88697208692.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
