Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arches National Park Night: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
oppose |
Vanderdecken (talk | contribs) →Arches National Park by Night: strong oppose |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* '''Oppose''' Quality is bad. The stars are very blurred, the whole sky looks fake, and it's very noisy. Doesn't really illustrate anything either. Sorry, it's pretty as a thumbnail, but not an FP. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 20:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' Quality is bad. The stars are very blurred, the whole sky looks fake, and it's very noisy. Doesn't really illustrate anything either. Sorry, it's pretty as a thumbnail, but not an FP. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 20:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
* '''Strong Oppose''' Looks somewhat like a background out of Star Trek, sorry, just not up to quality standards. [[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 06:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
* '''Strong Oppose''' Looks somewhat like a background out of Star Trek, sorry, just not up to quality standards. [[User:Dengero|Dengero]] ([[User talk:Dengero|talk]]) 06:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong Oppose''' - horrific noise, blurry, lighting is bad, not to mention the heavy JPG artifacting. Sorry, not a chance. Try [[WP:PPR]] before FPC next time. —[[User:Vanderdecken|Vanderdecken]]∴ '''[[User talk:Vanderdecken|∫]][[Special:Emailuser/Vanderdecken|ξ]][[Special:Contributions/Vanderdecken|φ]]''' 11:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 11:25, 10 February 2008
- Reason
- A vast majority of pictures are taken during the day. Few are taken at night.
- Articles this image appears in
- Arches National Park
- Creator
- Alwynloh
- Support as nominator Alwynloh (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is bad. The stars are very blurred, the whole sky looks fake, and it's very noisy. Doesn't really illustrate anything either. Sorry, it's pretty as a thumbnail, but not an FP. Clegs (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose Looks somewhat like a background out of Star Trek, sorry, just not up to quality standards. Dengero (talk) 06:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - horrific noise, blurry, lighting is bad, not to mention the heavy JPG artifacting. Sorry, not a chance. Try WP:PPR before FPC next time. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)