User talk:Insanity Incarnate

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Hello Insanity

Thanks for your message about removing content from a user page. I have reedited it so that the original content remains with my addition.

Mint Chicks Page

The band have asked for their page to be edited to be more surreal to fit in with their current marketing campaign, or for some other reason. I think many of us are adhering to the surrealistic approach they want - admittedly there's nothing funny about the amount of lesbian comments being used, but I think some is rather amusing none the less.

However, I can agree with you're removal of some comments. So my above statement is really devoid of any real arguement :)

"Surrealism" in an article isn't so bad, as long as it is still true (and verifiable). This is an encyclopedia, after all, not a fan site or promotional website. — Insanity Incarnate 07:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free image removed from your user page

Hello, Insanity Incarnate. I've removed Image:Xkcd philosophy.png from your user page, as it is a copyrighted image that is not available under a sufficiently free license and is therefore being used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. Unfortunately, by Wikipedia policies, no non-free images can be used on user pages; please see the ninth item of the Wikipedia non-free content policy and Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images. This image has not been deleted from any articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. —Bkell (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Alpha Mom

I removed the hangon tag, but thank you for checking out the article. I reviewed the speedy deletion tag that was originally placed on the article and found the article to be ineligible for deletion under the criterion mentioned (it was criterion A1 - little or no context). Let me know if you have any questions. Leebo ^T/C 19:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

userboxes...

i know this is really rather random, but I've got some userboxes you might like, so check out my userpage and steal any box you want! ~User: Sophiakorichi

Re.Scam

The Food scam is a real scam. In this, "you" go into a expensive resteraunt, eat a BIG expensivemeal, but you do'nt pay for it. Instead, you secretly place dead roaches, rat turds in the remains of your meal, then you threaten to sue the place. They in turn "settle the complaint" by letting you have your $400.00 meal, etc. to make sure you do NOT sue them, since a lawsuit will destroy the place's reputation. Now can you RESTORE that FACT ? I helped catch a scammer of that sort. 65.173.105.118 (talk) 05:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

User:UTisNUM1

You recently left a tag on the above user's talk page, kindly asking them to stop vandalising the Torrie Wilson article, saying that they would be blocked upon further vandalism. Recently, the user left this vandalism on the TNA Wrestling article. Would it be possible for you to tackle this issue, as I do not know how to deal with it. --SteelersFan UK06 20:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

My userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I appreciate it greatly. RJaguar3 | u | t 22:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Have a barnstar.

		The Original Barnstar
		For having vandalism on your userpage reverted by someone.

Thanks. RJaguar3 | u | t 20:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

AIV report

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Specifically, the IP hadn't gotten a warning since a week ago and since it is a dynamic (portable) IP, we won't block unless it's gotten recent warnings.--Chaser - T 04:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Insanity Incarnate! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 10:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The Counter Vandalism Award

You get this award for all your hard work on reverting vandalism. This award was made for people who are good at vandalism fighting, and you are one of them. Be careful, and have a fun day! BASE101() 19:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! — Insanity Incarnate 20:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: November 2007

It wasn't personal analysis; I added references. --24.235.231.206 (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Even with references, it's still a non-neutral opinion. Wikipedia articles need to follow the Neutral point of view policy. See also: Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms. — Insanity Incarnate 03:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I noticed the message you recently left to 24.235.231.206. Please remember to try not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.231.206 (talk) 09:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

speedy

Do you really think that an article that asserts someone "was awarded a Distinguished Service Medal for services to Africa and later in 1985 he was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II. In 1986, he was given the Raoul Wallenburg Award for Humanity." is making not even an assertion of notability? A mere assertion defeats speedy. See WP:CSD. DGG (talk) 03:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see my mistake. I was looking at this revision, which I now see to be vandalism. Sorry! — Insanity Incarnate 05:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Deerpath Golf Course

Hi. A bit confused. I came to update the Deerpath_Golf_Course subject I started and I saw it was deleted. I thought a golf course was notable and I was looking forward to posting more information as it is a very popular public course in Lake Forest, IL. I don't want to cause a problem though, but I though it wouldn't hurt to ask for it to be restored so I could update it. If not, no worries, I won't take it personally. I don't believe my starter page was about a person and if there was something I did wrong, then please provide detail so I can avoid problems in the future. Thanks! --Golfann —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.240.13 (talk) 04:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

The reason that I nominated that page for deletion was that it didn't give any (or enough) reason why this golf course was notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. (See Wikipedia:Notability for more information.) If you still think that the golf course deserves an article, you can ask a Wikipedia administrator (like User:Tone, the admin who deleted your page) to restore it for you. Be sure to include enough notability information in your request and the article so that your request will not be denied, and so that the page will not be deleted. Good luck — Insanity Incarnate 22:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Insanity, thank you for the prompt reply. The golf course is one of the oldest in the history of the Midwest, as well as the United States. It is referenced on the City Of Lake Forest, IL website. The club was formed in 1926 and has over 20,000 search results for the term "Deerpath Golf Course, Lake Forest, IL" (to avoid unlikely match terms I expanded the search phrase to isolate this golf course in specific). From your response, should I be presenting what I am posting here to User:Tone? The information provided from Deerpath Golf Lake Forest, IL appears to be accurate and notable. The course is mentioned in the local news during the summer at least once per week if not daily. I read the reference you provided Wikipedia:Notability and had intended on updating my article with more information. I guess I am frustrated because I am trying to contribute and was careful to only provide what I believe to be notable information (based on notable sources and was gong to provide more but my article was deleted, lol) about a notable golf course which has been around for over 80 years. Anyway, any help you could offer or assitance would be welcomed and appreciated. I just need help and some guidance. The last thing I want to do is be seen as a user posting junk. So please help me better my work. (not signed in because not at my own PC, IP address should match though. Using computer in cafeteria. Paranoid of key loggers) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.240.13 (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)