User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 19

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

woolerball

i see you have deleted the article on this sport and you claim it is not notable, well why is any sport notable and how many people have to play it to count as notable. i can tell you that many people do in fact play this sport and it is increasing in popularity throughout the united kingdom. So i suggest that it should be reinstated becuase you have clrearly deleted the article despite being too uniformed to make that decision.

yawpbox

In regards to the deletion of yawpbox, is there any direction that you can suggest that would assist in getting this up? I believe you were primarily deleting for not having notable sources, would this include magazine/newspaper articles about the significance of the site? thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imaginuity Stark (talk • contribs) 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thank you, I will compile those articles for upload

"Attacks"

Spellcast is my friend. I talk to him, it's a joke. God, now I remember why I left Wikipedia. People need to lighten up and take a joke. --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 16:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

King Lear

You may need to protect King Lear some more - the Noche de Reyes vandal is back. This time he's Panelequal2222 (talk · contribs). He's left a billet-doux on your user page. JohnCD (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Daniel J. Torres

I am not sure why the Daniel J. Torres page got deleted. I know as I wrote in the article he is still in high school but he has done major things to influence literally thousands of people. He started Yarmulke Day a day that supports peace and tolerance, it was written about by the Poughkeepsie Journal, and Daily Freeman. He also found out that the major sports chain Olympia Sports was selling school merchandise with out permission and saw to it that they donated the money. This affected an estimated 200 high schools thus meaning thousands of students, this was also documented in New Yorks oldest paper Poughkeepsie Journal. He also was voted the Top Ten Most Influential Under 20 In The Hudson-Valley by the Times Herald Record. I was not able to site that because it will be in Sunday’s paper and has yet to be printed. He is certainly relevant enough to have an article. So I don’t know if you have any suggestions on how I could have made it better so it wont be deleted next time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mantle536 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Mo supreme court

Stop deleting the entry "Better Courts for Missouri." The organization is in the process of developing its Wiki entry and cannot easily do that so long as you delete it every time it comes up. The organization is the subject of substantial news coverage in Missouri and is a 501(c)4 that is actively involved in Missouri politics.

Again, your cooperation would be appreciated as the organization is legitimate and interested in having a functional and helpful entry on this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mo supreme court (talk • contribs) 04:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Orlady (talk) 04:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Advice

Hi there, you declined a speedy deletion nomination of mine for OUTTAKES & MISTAKE - A Dumb Video. I've read the guidelines and seen where I was going wrong. It's strange that some things that don't assert their significance can be nominated but others can't! Anyway, while I'm here could I ask what the policy is for user pages like this? It's written like an article. I guess that's fine, is it? Cheers, MSGJ (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

--lord kass (talk) 05:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect 'Beowulf and Grendel'

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 'Beowulf and Grendel', by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 'Beowulf and Grendel' is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 'Beowulf and Grendel', please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks!

For watching my UP :-) --Piero Montesacro (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

This is Donnieur. Please recreate my New world pirate page as it is relevent to age of empires 3 because it is letting viewers know what clan thy should try to challange to have a fun and challaging game. I beg of you to please restore my page! Please if you also could make the title slots into sections as done on most pages. Please recreate my page. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnieur (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Even though gaming clans are not considered important this clan is and is widly known in age of empires. people have wanted to know more about this clan and have gone to wikipedia to find no article exist. Also what is the harm with adding anothere article that will make wikipedia even more popular? Please put this The New World Pirates article back up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnieur (talk • contribs) 22:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

TripleME

Hi, FYI, it's reappeared. Strangely, this time it was created with the {{hangon}} template already in place. — BillC ^talk 00:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk page deletions

talk pages don't get deleted

• User talk:Bullfights In Tijuana [1]
• User talk:VaughnJess [2]
• User talk:Seaworldpunk [3]
• User talk:Digital Movers LLC [4]
• User talk:BioSd [5]
• User talk:Yordanka [6]
• User talk:Jeggers2 [7]
• User talk:CoDebris [8]

From the last 24 hours, not including author requests, page moves, or IP pages.

--Calton | Talk 07:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chuck fay

A tag has been placed on Chuck fay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Gongs" in silverchair article

The word "gong" is an australian term for award. Since silverchair are an australian group i think its is appopriate to use that expression. Espeically since what you changed it too (songs) makes no sence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.60.38.10 (talk) 16:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Balaraman

Recreated! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC) SO fast!!! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Mesa Riverview

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Mesa_Riverview. Corvus cornix_talk 18:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Moving Mountains

To clarify, I am in no way affiliated with the band. Last year, they recorded and released Pneuma independently, producing arguably one of the finest releases of the year in the post-rock genre. They have quickly risen to popularity, as demonstrated by their 150 000 plays on Last.fm (as a comparison, Justin Hayward has 40 000).

Right now, I can't guarantee that the band fulfills the notability criteria (unless reviews in major webzines qualify as non-trivial works), so I guess the article will have to wait.

That said, I don't see the purpose of deleting my disambiguation page, which also listed the album by The Casket Lottery. I sincerely doubt that more than a few percent of queries for "Moving Mountains" actually relate to the single article now available, so providing a more complete listing of uses should only be beneficial, regardless of whether the other uses qualify for individual pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esc4p1st (talk • contribs) 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Annandale United FC

Hello NawlinWiki. This article, which you recently deleted as an A7, has been recreated by its author. EdJohnston (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Eric J. Seidman wiki Deleted

NawlinWiki, my created article on screenwriter, sabermetrician, and magician Eric J. Seidman was speedily deleted because I did not know we needed to prove notability... I provided over 10 valid web-links as references to prove his notability and would like to get his wiki back up and running. Please help me to learn how to place notability tags or whatever is required in order to get his page back up and running. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejs5015 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Sorry, but we haven't made a thank you template yet (for voting). But thanks, anyway! Cheers, Basketball110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 23:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

There we go! Basketball110 Clinton, Obama, McCain, Huckabee, Romney, or Paul? 00:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Earthbendingmaster/thanks Earthbendingmaster 23:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Question about Speedy Deletion of Ocean Grove Record?

Hi NawlinWiki,

I see that this new article, contributed today by newbie User talk:Bilbobag was immediately nom for SD by you and deleted shortly thereafter. Not having seen the article before it was deleted, I don't know just how lacking it was as far as CSD A3 is concerned. But regarding CSD A7, I believe this is a long-established newspaper in Ocean Grove, New Jersey. If poorly written, shouldn't other editors have been given a chance to improve the article and/or comment at AfD, instead? JGHowes ^talk - 02:22, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Advice about the Kaneh Bosem article?

There is some speculation about the definition but apparently Hebrew University has deemed it to mean cannabis. Do I just have to make the article formatted like a regular definition or was it deleted because it's controversial?

Thanks/ Have a good one,

--TaylorOliphant (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I hope that all good things in life happen to you.--TaylorOliphant (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

ok .........i'm sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sfsfstrefred (talk • contribs) 15:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Indian Liberal Right

This is about the fourth time this guy has created this unsourced odd little "article"/essay/manifesto under various spelling variants. Do you feel it doesn't quality for a speedy as no-context? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of CreateNewPage

Hi, I am a new User, and may not have come to grips with all the controls and terminology. I was trying to write a page called The Silly Point, but I couldn't find how to create the Title. I accidentally clicked the save button instead of the show preview. It got published before it was complete.

You made a speedy deletion on grounds of non-notability.
I would like to mention why this site should be considered as a notable site.
1. This is the only non-BBC site that has been accepted by the BBC Sports TestMatchSpecial page as a Related Site and Link http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/tms/ (on the right sidebar near the bottom).
2. It is also recognised by an independent website, the Indian news portal http://rambhai.com (on the right sidebar) as a Friend of Rambhai. This was due to the quality of articles being posted.
3. This is probably the only cricket board that is truly multinational, as it now has members from every single ICC full-member nations. This is difficult to prove, but is a certainly a very significant and a rare feature.
4. This site has a cricket-only search engine. This probably the only such searchengine for cricket, but is difficult to prove.

I am writing this for your reconsideration, rather than putting up the page again. The other points I would request you to consider are:
1. This is an amateur site, with no commercial interest and has promised to continue as a non-commercial site.
2. Wikipedia has a page to describe Web 2.0, this is a true example of one.
This is a site that aims to unite cricket fans from all cricket playing nations through interactions on the web, through two different platforms, the discussion forum and the blogspages.
Sports is meant to unite and not divide, and that is what this site aims to achieve.
3. Wikipedia has accepted cricketwatchdogs.com's page. That is a commercial site, that wants publicity to increase its revenue. It had started as a site to generate a hate campaign, and then to tap into the commercial market changed its name. The publication of its change of name on news sites is its evidence of notability, not its quality. The Silly Points have gained recognition for being a site of quality.

I request again for this page to be reconsidered.
If any changes are necessary, I am perfectly happy to do so.

Regards Awmyth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awmyth (talk • contribs) 20:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

One Fine Day!

I am curious as to why the site was pulled down again in the middle of an edit. The original reason for the site deletion had been due to "a lack of notability" which had been rectified with the latest update that included 2 new sources from outside the "local" area and it included links to articles that could not be previously verified. The show is not just a "YouTube" or "Local" show as it is broadcast on a network that reaches over 3,500 campuses in the US alone, the Open Student Television Network.

I respectfully request that this article please be reconsidered.

-Fkick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkick (talk • contribs) 03:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for One Fine Day!

An editor has asked for a deletion review of One Fine Day!. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fkick (talk) 03:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Fkick

The Silly Point:

Please refer to my message above. This is in continuation of the instructions on my talk page. I have re-submitted the entry (originally submitted in error as Create new page) This is the final version with entries and references as to its notability. I request you to approve its notability. If you suggest further changes to make it acceptable, I will be happy to comply. Regards Awmyth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awmyth (talk • contribs) 11:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Manimal (band)

I started an article yesterday about Manimal, a French metal band from Toulouse, which was deleted before I had time to finish it. The reason stated was that the article "failed to demonstrate the significance" of the band. This is quite odd, as I had, in this very article, remarked that the band was classified under a sub-genre that was created, named, and pioneered by the band itself, and a few other bands of the area.

This page about Siebenbürgen has even less information than my page on Manimal did, and, rather than being forerunners of a genre of music, Siebenbürgen's music is decisively set in predefined styles - tell me, which is more significant, and which article relays (or rather, relayed) the band's significance more?

Though it is not my place to admonish an admin, I would request that you be a little more thoughtful before you cackhandedly delete articles that hold/could hold some importance. If the band is good enough for fr.wikipedia.org, why is it less so for en.wikipedia.org?

I am now going to recreate the page, and add more than I did last time. Though you may see even the band as insignificant, there are many who would disagree with you. Thedragon5000

Mens Rea Band

Mens Rea Band has been recreated again. Just a head's up. Regards - Jd027^chat 17:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Amit Kumar (doctor) deletion

I was wondering if this article warranted deletion. I wonder about your action because the person, who is wanted in a multi-billion international kidney scandal, has recently been nabbed. Your thoughts? Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 05:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:X1

OK, now I'm confused. Looked like vandalism, but what's that page all about? _GB^T/C 13:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Deaf Pedestrians

Of course, it's fine. Thanks for telling me. You're far more experienced than me than this and I'm sure you know far better :) All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 18:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

should this user be deleted?

Since my own user area was deleted by NawlinWiki, I immediately thought of coming here to ask if the following user should be allowed at Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Seedplanter

Ottawahitech (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of ISG Solutions

trying to figure out all the rules (understand that there are many). regarding the speedy deletion of ISG Solutions. I am trying to use other software company listings that aren't marked as a guide to listing this one. I am unclear about the notabiliy rule. If we are listing in a company directory doesn't it have to be about a company?? Is there something you can steer me to that would explain this further? Any help would be appreciated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmyYaley AmyYaley (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

speedy deletion of ISG Solutions

Understood that Wiki isn't a company directory. However, there is a category with that heading. So I am unclear as to where the line is drawn. Thank you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmyYaley AmyYaley (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

rob and katie

could you please explain to me how i did not show that rob and katie are significant to our community in my last edit? THANKS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robandkatie (talk • contribs) 19:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild

Thanks for moving the article. Gerhard51 (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)