User talk:RickinBaltimore: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:05, 11 February 2008

Woolerball

I dont understand why this article keeps being deleted is it being vandalised. if so could you help me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Out of interest why are you deemed to be able to decide if an article is notable or not.

Furhter you are wrong about it just being made up one day but because you have deleted the article it leaves no chance for its improvement and ultimately proving you to have made an error in your decsion to delete.

example of better report

You filed a SSP on Moral Victor. I also saw it on ANI. May I suggest that you write a short description rather than simply state that they are socks? The next SSP may be an example where it describes why the two people are socks. It says

Jsb394 is a representative of One Economy Corporation. They confirmed that they were 208.118.160.122, which is registered to One Economy Corporation. They created Rey Ramsey and Alec Ross (Social Entrepreneur). Several days after they their COI came to light, they stopped editing. Later the same day the new editor Mosquito0016 started editing the One Economy Corporation related articles. Almost all of the Mosquito0016 edits have been to these articles.

It's not too complicated but is very helpful. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody else helped you! It's now a very detailed report, much more detailed than I was expecting! Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feloni DRV

You recently participated in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feloni (2nd nomination). As you may or may not know, the deletion discussion recently went to Deletion Review, (discussion,) and the result of the review was to relist the AfD for a third, and hopefully final time. I invite you to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feloni (3rd nomination), so that we can finally come to consensus. -- RoninBK _{T C} 16:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blind man`s bluff

G4? -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

just in case it reappears: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind mans bluff ( movie ). But since it got speedied G4 is not valid ;). -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 I dont understand why this article keeps being deleted is it being vandalised. if so could you help me?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:S0456769|S0456769]] ([[User talk:S0456769|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/S0456769|contribs]]) 20:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+Out of interest why are you deemed to be able to decide if an article is notable or not.
+Furhter you are wrong about it just being made up one day but because you have deleted the article it leaves no chance for its improvement and ultimately proving you to have made an error in your decsion to delete.
 == example of better report ==