Talk:Sexuality of Adolf Hitler

THIS IS ALREADY COVERED IN THE MAIN ARTICLE!!!!--In ur base, killing ur dorfs 00:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

shouldn't this be covered in the main article instead of having its own page?? Betina 20:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

The report that this article mostly refers to was written by the Allies in 1943, during the height of World War II. I believe it to be highly biased, and more propaganda than a valid source.

The main article is too long, so it is appropriate for this topic to have its own article. --ukexpat 19:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

WTF? Propoganda? Dude, are you DEFENDING the man or something? This isn't propoganda, by now these are well-known facts. 81.145.240.233 13:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Aha. So because the man in question is evil, every accusation made towards him are automatically true. Great reasoning. The OSS is a propaganda piece, this was even stated by the authors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.152.109.41 (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I want to add something to the masochism part of this article citing Hitler: The Pathology of Evil. How do I go about doing that? Addie777 06:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

dis is da best on da wikipedia aout da most ecil man —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.179.110 (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

da best i about madonna and da leder jacket da bdsm and still game —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.179.110 (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Merge in Adolf Hitler

The article should be clearly merged on Adolf Hitler Article as it is already mentioned. And all the statements there are facts and it is why it does have a NPOV. The Sentences that may not be Neutral i remarked them as facts and they are quotes and not opinions.